Skip to main content

Analysis of Accuracy and Timing in Decision-Making Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Bioengineering and Biomedical Signal and Image Processing (BIOMESIP 2021)

Abstract

The present study investigates the separation abilities by age and gender based on raw data of two-alternative force choice decision-making task in visuo-motor experiment. The applied methodology is based on machine learning procedure for finding, assessing, and interpreting existing dependencies in interested data spaces. The procedure applies fuzzy cluster analysis to discrimate the biosignal data of the visual task where the location of the pattern center is determined by form cues, motion cues, or by their combination. The obtained grouping results are assessed according to the participants’ age and gender. Further, these results are compared against the results obtained of statistical parameters data of a hierarchical drift-diffusion model (HDDM) processed by the same machine learning methodology. Differences in the subjects’ capabilities to perform the visuo-motor task are summarized. It was found that age groups could be recognized with similar success by both raw and HDDM data clustering analyses. Between factors analysis strongly underlines the informativity of the reaction time. Dynamic conditions are better performed for age distinction in both cases. However, the gender is better recognizable in HDDM data space. The group of young people is characterized by low reaction time and middle value of accuracy in their responce, whereas the reverse is valid for the middle-aged participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bocheva, N., Genova, B., Stefanova, M.: Drift diffusion modeling of response time in heading estimation based on motion and form cues. Int. J. Biol. Biomed. Eng. 12, 75–83 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goodale, M.A., Milner, A.D.: Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 15, 20–25 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bezdek, J.C.: Pattern Recognition with Fuzzy Objective Function Algorithms. Plenum Press, NY (1981)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Ratcliff, R., Smith, P., Brown, S., MacKoon, G.: Diffusion decision model: current issues and history. Trends Cogn. Sci. 20(4), 260–281 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratcliff, R., Smith, P.: Perceptual discrimination in static and dynamic noise: the temporal relation between perceptual encoding and decision-making. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 139(1), 70–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ratcliff, R., MacKoon, G.: The diffusion decision model: theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Comput. 20(4), 873–922 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Viswanathan, M., Whangbo, T.K., Yang, Y.K.: Data mining in ubiquitous healthcare. In: Funatsu, K. (ed.) New Fundamental Technologies in Data Mining. InTech (2011). ISBN: 978-953-307-547-1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Di, W., Zhu, D.: Study on brainfag based on EEG signal analysis. In: Proc. of ETP International Conference on Future Computer and Communication, pp. 134–137. June (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wiecki, T.V., Sofer, I., Frank, M.J.: HDDM: hierarchical bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in python. Front. Neuroinform. 7, 1–10 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Georgieva, O., Bocheva, N., Genova, B., Stefanova, M.: Eye movement data analysis. In: Iliadis, L., Angelov, P.P., Jayne, C., Pimenidis, E. (eds.) EANN 2020. PINNS, vol. 2, pp. 460–470. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48791-1_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Glass, L.: Moire effect from random dots. Nature 223, 578–580 (1969)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kraleva, R., Kralev, V., Sinyagina, N., Koprinkova-Hristova, P., Bocheva, N.: Design and analysis of a relational database for behavioral experiments data processing. Int. J. Online Eng. 14(2), 117–132 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chousiadas, D., Menychtas, A., Tsanakas, P., Maglogiannis, I.: Advancing quantified-self applications utilizing visual data analytics and the internet of things. In: Iliadis, L., Maglogiannis, I., Plagianakos, V. (eds.) AIAI 2018. IAICT, vol. 520, pp. 263–274. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92016-0_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Poddar, M.G., Birajdar, A.C., Virmani, J., Kriti: Automated classification of hypertension and coronary artery disease patients by PNN, KNN, and SVM classifiers using HRV analysis. In: Dey, N., Borra, S., Ashour, A.S., Shi, F. (eds.) Machine Learning in Bio-Signal Analysis and Diagnostic Imaging, pp. 99–125. Academic Press (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Sevakula, R.K., Au‐Yeung, W.T.M., Singh, J.P., Heist, E.K., Isselbacher, E.M., Armoundas, A.A.: State‐of‐the‐art machine learning techniques aiming to improve patient outcomes pertaining to the cardiovascular system. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 9(4) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Swan, M.: The quantified self: fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data 1(2), 85–99 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research work has been supported by GATE project, funded by the Horizon 2020 WIDESPREAD-2018-2020 TEAMING Phase 2 programme under grant agreement No. 857155 and and Operational Programme Science and Education for Smart Growth under Grant Agreement No. BG05M2OP001-1.003-0002-C01 as well as by the Science Fund of Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski”, Bulgaria under grant FNI-SU-80-10-152/05.04.2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olga Georgieva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Georgieva, O., Bocheva, N., Stefanova, M., Genova, B. (2021). Analysis of Accuracy and Timing in Decision-Making Tasks. In: Rojas, I., Castillo-Secilla, D., Herrera, L.J., Pomares, H. (eds) Bioengineering and Biomedical Signal and Image Processing. BIOMESIP 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12940. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88163-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88163-4_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-88162-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-88163-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics