Abstract
A simple model accounting for entailments between sentential predicates with propositional attitude verbs is proposed. In this model no reference to propositions is made. Sentential predicates denote specific sets of sentences (of a given natural language). This approach avoids the problem of intensionality of propositional attitude operators and permits to use many tools from the generalised quantifier theory.
Thanks to at least one referee for useful comments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Keenan, E.L., Faltz, L.M.: Boolean Semantics for Natural Language. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1985)
Partee, B.H.: Belief-sentences and the limits of semantics. In: Peters, S., Saarinen, E. (eds.) Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, pp. 87–106. D. Reidel Publishing Company (1982)
Westerståhl, D.: Midpoints. In: Graf, T., et al. (eds.) Theories of Everything, pp. 427–439. UCLA (2012)
Zuber, R.: Factives and intensionality. In: Onada, T., Bekki, D., McCready, E. (eds.) JSAI-isAI 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6797, pp. 104–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25655-4_9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zuber, R. (2021). Entailments with Sentential Predicates. In: Baroni, P., Benzmüller, C., Wáng, Y.N. (eds) Logic and Argumentation. CLAR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13040. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-89390-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-89391-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)