Skip to main content

Investigating Customers’ Perceived Sensitivity of Information Shared with a Robot Bartender

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Social Robotics (ICSR 2021)

Abstract

Personalised experiences with service robots positively affect people’s perception of the robot and, consequently, foster the success of the interaction. This implies that people need to share their personal information with the robot, which could let people feel uneasy when such interactions happen in public spaces or in the presence of strangers. Therefore, it is difficult for a service robot to personalise a human-robot interaction (HRI) when this can lead to a breach of privacy. As a first step, the current study investigated people’s perception of the sensitivity of various categories of potentially private personal information that are likely to be used by a service robot in a public business, such as a bar. We conducted a questionnaire-based study, where participants rated 15 personal information that they could share with either a human or robot bartender. The potentially private information was rated by participants according to their level of sensitivity. We analysed responses from 76 participants. We clearly identified information that are perceived as highly sensitive, such as those related to a person’s identity (e.g. sexual orientation, political beliefs), and as low in sensitivity, such as those related to personal interests (e.g. sports, TV shows). Our findings also showed that older people consider sharing their preference of drinks more sensitive than younger people, especially when the bartender is a robot. We did not find significant differences in users’ ratings due to their gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that we did not ask participants to give us their personal information. We simply asked them to rate the sensitivity level of such information.

References

  1. Basharat, I., Azam, F., Muzaffar, A.W.: Database security and encryption: a survey study. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 47, 28–34 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berezina, K., Ciftci, O., Cobanoglu, C.: Robots, Artificial Intelligence, and Service Automation in Restaurants. Ivanov, S., Webster, C. (Ed.), pp. 185–219 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bissonette, R.: The mental health gatekeeper role: a paradigm for conceptual pretest. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 23(1), 31–34 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake, L.: Last Call: The New Orleans Bartender as Conversational Healing Tonic. University of Louisiana at Monroe (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatzimichali, A., Harrison, R., Chrysostomou, D.: Toward privacy-sensitive human-robot interaction: privacy terms and human-data interaction in the personal robot era. Paladyn J. Behav. Robot. 12(1), 160–174 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dautenhahn, K.: Robots we like to live with?! - a developmental perspective on a personalized, life-long robot companion. In: RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759), pp. 17–22 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2004.1374720

  7. Fung, B.C.M., Wang, K., Chen, R., Yu, P.S.: Privacy-preserving data publishing: a survey of recent developments. ACM Comput. Surv. 42(4), 1–53 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gosling, S.D., Rentfrow, P.J., Swann, W.B.: A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. J. Res. Personal. 37(6), 504–528 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hegel, F., Gieselmann, S., Peters, A., Holthaus, P., Wrede, P.: Towards a typology of meaningful signals and cues in social robotics. In: 2011 RO-MAN, pp. 72–78 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/ROMAN.2011.6005246

  10. Hidayanti, I., Herman, L.E., Farida, N.: Engaging customers through social media to improve industrial product development: the role of customer co-creation value. J. Relat. Market. 17(1), 17–28 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhn, S., Mostert, P.: Relationship intention and relationship quality as predictors of clothing retail customers’ loyalty. Int. Rev. Retail Distrib. Consumer Res. 28(2), 206–230 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lutz, C., Tamò, A.: Robocode-ethicists: privacy-friendly robots, an ethical responsibility of engineers? In: Proceedings of the ACM Web Science Conference. WebSci ’15, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Masuda, T., Misaki, D.: Development of japanese green tea serving robot “t-bartender". In: IEEE International Conference Mechatronics and Automation, 2005, vol. 2, pp. 1069–1074 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rios-Martinez, J., Spalanzani, A., Laugier, C.: From proxemics theory to socially-aware navigation: a survey. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 7(2), 137–153 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Room, R.: Smoking and drinking as complementary behaviours. Biomed. Pharmacotherapy 58(2), 111–115 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L.: How the timing and magnitude of robot errors influence peoples’ trust of robots in an emergency scenario. In: Kheddar, A., Yoshida, E., Ge, S.S., Suzuki, K., Cabibihan, J.J., Eyssel, F., He, H. (eds.) Social Robotics, pp. 42–52. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L.: Human perceptions of the severity of domestic robot errors. In: Kheddar, A., Yoshida, E., Ge, S.S., Suzuki, K., Cabibihan, J.J., Eyssel, F., He, H. (eds.) Social Robotics, pp. 647–656. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70022-9_64

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Rossi, A., Dautenhahn, K., Koay, K.L., Walters, M.L., Holthaus, P.: Evaluating people’s perceptions of trust in a robot in a repeated interactions study. In: Wagner, A.R., Feil-Seifer, D., Haring, K.S., Rossi, S., Williams, T., He, H., Sam Ge, S. (eds.) Social Robotics, pp. 453–465. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62056-1_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossi, A., Giura, V., Leva, C.D., Rossi, S.: I know what you would like to drink: Benefits and detriments of sharing personal info with a bartender robot (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rossi, A., Staffa, M., Origlia, A., di Maro, M., Rossi, S.: Brillo: A robotic architecture for personalised long-lasting interactions in a bartending domain. In: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 426–429. HRI ’21 Companion, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rueben, M., et al.: Themes and research directions in privacy-sensitive robotics. In: 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO), pp. 77–84 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sannon, S., Stoll, B., DiFranzo, D., Jung, M.F., Bazarova, N.N.: “i just shared your responses”: extending communication privacy management theory to interactions with conversational agents. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, 1–18 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schulz, T., Herstad, J.: Walking away from the robot: negotiating privacy with a robot. In: Proceedings of the 31st British Computer Society Human Computer Interaction Conference. HCI ’17, BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stubbs, A.G.P.: Learning to pour: An exploration into the socialization of the male night shift bartender (2001). https://scholar.uwindsor.ca/etd/2591

  25. Syrdal, D.S., Walters, M., Otero, N., Koay, K., Dautenhahn, K.: “he knows when you are sleeping" - privacy and the personal robot companion. In: In Proceedings of Workshop on Human Implications of Human-Robot Interaction. AAAI, pp. 28–33 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Warta, S.F., Newton, O.B., Song, J., Best, A., Fiore, S.M.: Effects of social cues on social signals in human-robot interaction during a hallway navigation task. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 62(1), 1128–1132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931218621258

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by Italian PON I&C 2014-2020 within the BRILLO research project “Bartending Robot for Interactive Long-Lasting Operations”, no. F/190066/01-02/X44.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rossi, A., Perugia, G., Rossi, S. (2021). Investigating Customers’ Perceived Sensitivity of Information Shared with a Robot Bartender. In: Li, H., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13086. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90524-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90525-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics