Skip to main content

Bridging Upper Ontology and Modular Ontology Modeling: a Tool and Evaluation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web (KGSWC 2021)

Abstract

Ontologies are increasingly used as schema for knowledge graphs in many application areas. As such, there are a variety of different approaches for their development. In this paper, we describe and evaluate UAO (for Upper Ontology Alignment Tool), which is an extension to CoModIDE, a graphical Protégé plugin for modular ontology modeling. UAO enables ontology engineers to combine modular ontology modeling with a more traditional ontology modeling approach based on upper ontologies. We posit – and our evaluation supports this claim – that the tool does indeed makes it easier to combine both approaches. Thus, UAO enables a best-of-both-worlds approach. The evaluation consists of a user study, and the results show that performing typical manual alignment modeling tasks is relatively easier with UAO than doing it with Protégé alone, in terms of the time required to complete the task and improving the correctness of the output. Additionally, our test subjects provided significantly higher ratings on the System Utilization Scale for UOA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html.

  3. 3.

    https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html.

References

  1. Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies With Basic Formal Ontology, MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Basili, V.R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H.D.: Experience factory. Encycl. Softw. Eng. (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blomqvist, E., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Experiments on pattern-based ontology design. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pp. 41–48 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blomqvist, E., Hammar, K., Presutti, V.: Engineering ontologies with patterns-the extreme design methodology. Ontol. Eng. Ontol. Des. Patt. 25, 23–50 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blomqvist, E., Presutti, V., Daga, E., Gangemi, A.: Experimenting with eXtreme design. In: Cimiano, P., Pinto, H.S. (eds.) EKAW 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6317, pp. 120–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Blomqvist, E., Sandkuhl, K.: Patterns in ontology engineering: classification of ontology patterns. In: ICEIS, vol. 3, pp. 413–416 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burnard, P.: A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research. Nurse Educ. Today 11(6), 461–466 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dalal, A., Shimizu, C., Hitzler, P.: Modular ontology modeling meets upper ontologies: the upper ontology alignment tool. In: The 19th International Semantic Web Conference, vol. 2721, pp. 119–124, October 2020

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gangemi, A.: Ontology design patterns for semantic web content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45810-7_18

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutiérrez, C., Sequeda, J.F.: Knowledge graphs. Commun. ACM 64(3), 96–104 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hammar, K.: Ontology design patterns in use: lessons learnt from an ontology engineering case. In: Workshop on Ontology Patterns in Conjunction with the 11th International Semantic Web Conference 2012 (ISWC 2012) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Herre, H.: General formal ontology (GFO): a foundational ontology for conceptual modelling. In: Poli, R., Healy, M., Kameas, A. (eds.) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications, pp. 297–345. Springer, Dordrecht (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8847-5_14

  14. Hitzler, P.: A review of the semantic web field. Commun. ACM 64(2), 76–83 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A., Presutti, V. (eds): Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns - Foundations and Applications, Volume 25 of Studies on the Semantic Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hitzler, P., Gangemi, A., Janowicz, K., Krisnadhi, A.A., Presutti, V.: Towards a simple but useful ontology design pattern representation language. In: Blomqvist, E., Corcho, Ó.. Horridge, M., Carral, D., Hoekstra, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Ontology Design and Patterns (WOP 2017) Co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017), Vienna, Austria, 21 October 2017, volume 2043 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lanzenberger, M., Sampson, J.: Alviz - a tool for visual ontology alignment. In: Tenth International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV 2006), pp. 430–440. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Niles, I., Pease. A.: Towards a standard upper ontology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, FOIS 2001, Ogunquit, Maine, USA, 17–19 October 2001, pp. 2–9. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Hum-Comput. Stud. 59(6), 983–1024 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A., et al.: Promptdiff: a fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 744–750 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oberle, D., et al.: DOLCE ergo SUMO: on foundational and domain models in the SmartWeb Integrated Ontology (SWIntO). J. Web Semant. 5(3), 156–174 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Osumi-Sutherland, D., Courtot, M., Balhoff, J.P., Mungall, C.J.: Dead simple OWL design patterns. J. Biomed. Seman. 8(1), 18:1–18:7 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perrin, D.S.J.: Prompt-viz: ontology version comparison visualizations with treemaps (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Presutti, V., Daga, E., Gangemi, A., Blomqvist, E.: eXtreme design with content ontology design patterns. In: Blomqvist, E., Sandkuhl, K., Scharffe, F., Svátek, V. (eds.) Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Patterns (WOP 2009), Collocated with the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-2009), Washington D.C., USA, 25 October, 2009, Volume 516 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Presutti, V., et al.: NeOn deliverable D2.5.1. a library of ontology design patterns: reusable solutions for collaborative design of networked ontologies. NeOn Project (2008). http://www.neon-project.org

  26. Shimizu, C., Hammar, K.: Comodide - the comprehensive modular ontology engineering IDE. In: ISWC 2019 Satellite Tracks (Posters & Demonstrations, Industry, and Outrageous Ideas) co-located with 18th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2019) Auckland, New Zealand, 26–30 October 2019, vol. 2456, pp. 249–252. CEUR-WS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shimizu, C., Hammar, K., Hitzler, P., et al.: Modular graphical ontology engineering evaluated. In: Harth, A., et al. (ed.) ESWC 2020. LNCS, vol. 12123, pp. 20–35. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49461-2_2

  28. Shneiderman, B.: Tree visualization with tree-maps: 2-D space-filling approach. ACM Trans. Graph. 11(1), 92–99 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shore et al., J. : The Art of Agile Development: Pragmatic Guide to Agile Software Development. O’Reilly Media Inc (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Skjæveland, M.G., Lupp, D.P., Karlsen, L.H., Forssell, H.: Practical ontology pattern instantiation, discovery, and maintenance with reasonable ontology templates. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11136, pp. 477–494. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith, B.: Classifying processes: an essay in applied ontology. Ratio 25(4), 463–488 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vita, R., Overton, J.A., Mungall, C.J., Sette, A., Peters. B.: FAIR principles and the IEDB: short-term improvements and a long-term vision of OBO-Foundry mediated machine-actionable interoperability. Database 2018:bax105 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wilkinson, M.D., et al.: The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology, under award number 70NANB19H094.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhilekha Dalal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dalal, A., Shimizu, C., Hitzler, P. (2021). Bridging Upper Ontology and Modular Ontology Modeling: a Tool and Evaluation. In: Villazón-Terrazas, B., Ortiz-Rodríguez, F., Tiwari, S., Goyal, A., Jabbar, M. (eds) Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Web. KGSWC 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1459. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91305-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91304-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91305-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics