Skip to main content

Cruising Drivers’ Response to Changes in Parking Prices in a Serious Game

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Social Simulation

Abstract

Scarcity of on-street parking in cities centers is a known factor motivating drivers to drive slowly (“to cruise”) while searching for an available parking place and is associated with negative externalities e.g., congestion, accidents, fuel waste and air pollution. Finding the correct prices is suggested to bring cruising to a sustainable level. However, current research methods based on surveys and simulations fail to provide a full understanding of drivers’ cruising preference and their behavioral response to price changes. We used the PARKGAME serious game, which provides a real-world abstraction of the dynamic cruising experience. Eighty-three players participated in an experiment under two pricing scenarios. Pricing was spatially designed as “price rings”, decreasing when receding from the desired destination point. Based on the data, we analyzed search time, parking distance, parking location choice and spatial searching patterns. We show that such a pricing policy may substantially reduce the cruising problem, motivating drivers to park earlier—further away from the destination or in the lot, especially when occupancy levels are extremely high. We further discuss the policy implications of these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Inci, E.: A review of the economics of parking. Econ. Transp. 4(1–2), 50–63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecotra.2014.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shoup, D.C.: Cruising for parking. Transp. Policy 13(6), 479–486 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2006.05.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooke, S., Ison, S., Quddus, M.: On-street parking search: review and future research direction. Transp. Res. Rec. 2469(2469), 65–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3141/2469-08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehner, S., Peer, S.: The price elasticity of parking: A meta-analysis. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 121, 177–191 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.01.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Inci, E., Lindsey, R.: Garage and curbside parking competition with search congestion. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 54, 49–59 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2015.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yan, X., Levine, J., Marans, R.: The effectiveness of parking policies to reduce parking demand pressure and car use. Transp Policy 73, 41–50 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.10.009

  7. Inci, E., van Ommeren, J., Kobus, M.: The external cruising costs of parking. J. Econ. Geogr. 17(6), 1301–1323 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbx004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Millard-ball, A., Weinberger, R.R., Hampshire, R.C.: Is the curb 80 % full or 20 % empty? Assessing the impacts of San Francisco’s parking pricing experiment. Transp. Res. Part A 63, 76–92 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alemi, F., Rodier, C., Drake, C.: Cruising and on-street parking pricing: a difference-in-difference analysis of measured parking search time and distance in San Francisco. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 111, 187–198 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Polak, J., Axhausen, K.W.: Parking search behaviour: a review of current research and future prospects. Transport Studies Units, Working Paper, 540 (1990)‏

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hampshire, R.C., Jordon, D., Akinbola, O., Richardson, K., Weinberger, R., Millard-Ball, A., Karlin-Resnik, J.: Analysis of parking search behavior with video from naturalistic driving. Transp. Res. Rec. 2543, 152–158 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3141/2543-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benenson, I., Martens, K., Birfir, S.: PARKAGENT: an agent-based model of parking in the city. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 32(6), 431–439 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2008.09.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy, N., Martens, K., Benenson, I.: Exploring cruising using agent-based and analytical models of parking. Transp. A Transport Sci. 9(9), 773–797 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/18128602.2012.664575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brownstone, D., Small, K.A.: Valuing time and reliability: assessing the evidence from road pricing demonstrations. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 39(4), 279–293 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hertwig, R., Erev, I.: The description—experience gap in risky choice. Trends Cogn. Sci. 13(12), 517–523 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mol, J.M.: Goggles in the lab: economic experiments in immersive virtual environments. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 79, 155–164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fox, J., Bailenson, J.N.: Virtual self-modeling: the effects of vicarious reinforcement and identification on exercise behaviors. Media Psychol. 12(1), 1–25 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260802669474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chaniotakis, E., Pel, A.J.: Drivers’ parking location choice under uncertain parking availability and search times: a stated preference experiment. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 82, 228–239 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Golias, J., Yannis, G., Harvatis, M.: Off-street parking choice sensitivity. Transp. Plan. Technol. 25(4), 333–348 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/0308106022000019620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simi, J., Vukanovi, S., Milosavljevi, N.: The effect of parking charges and time limit to car usage and parking behaviour. Transp. Policy 30, 125–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ma, X., Sun, X., He, Y., Chen, Y.: Parking choice behavior investigation: a case study at Beijing Lama Temple. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 96, 2635–2642 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Klein, I., Ben-elia, E.: Emergence of cooperation in congested road networks using ICT and future and emerging technologies : a game-based review. Transp. Res. Part C 72, 10–28 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Salen, K., Tekinbaş, K.S., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of play: Game Design Fundamentals. MIT Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mitchell, A.: The ESRI Guide to GIS Analysis (Volume 2). CA, Esri Press, Redlands (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Erev, I., Ert, E., Roth, A.E.: A choice prediction competition for market entry games: an introduction. Games 1(2), 117–136 (2010)‏. https://doi.org/10.3390/g1020117

  26. Rapoport, A., Kugler, T., Dugar, S.: Choice of routes in congested traffic networks: experimental tests of the Braess Paradox. Games Econom. Behav. 65(2), 538–571 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2008.02.007

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Miller, H.J.: Beyond sharing : cultivating cooperative transportation systems through geographic information science. J. Transp. Geogr. 31, 296–308 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.04.007

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Card, S.K., Mackilay, J.D., Shneiderman, B.: Reading in information visualization using vision to think. Morgan Kaufmann (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. Computer 38(9), 25–32 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zichermann, G., Cunningham, C.: Gamification by Design. O’Reilly Media, Inc. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peters, V., Vissers, G., Heijne, G.: The validity of games. Simul. Gaming 29(1), 20–30 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878198291003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fulman, N., Benenson, I., Ben Elia, E.: Modeling parking search behavior in the city center: a game-based approach. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 120(September),(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102800

  33. Carrese, S., Negrenti, E., Belles, B.B.: Simulation of the parking phase for urban traffic emission models. In: TRISTAN V-Triennial Symposium on Transportation Analysis, Guadeloupe (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Greiner, B.: Subject pool recruitment procedures: organizing experiments with ORSEE. J. Econ. Sci. Assoc. 1(1), 114–125 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-015-0004-4

  35. Millard-Ball, A., Hampshire, R.C., Weinberger, R.: Parking behaviour: the curious lack of cruising for parking in San Francisco. Land Use Policy 91,(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.031

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eran Ben-Elia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Geva, S., Ben-Elia, E. (2022). Cruising Drivers’ Response to Changes in Parking Prices in a Serious Game. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics