Abstract
Systems dynamics models of social processes generally have a formal core of quantitative equations. The temporal dynamics of their output may however be categorized according to qualitative typologies: depending on the model parameters, output variables may fluctuate, steadily increase or decrease, etc. Hence the present paper suggests to explore by computer simulation the relation between parameter values and the associated type of model dynamics. The result may be mapped in a multi-dimensional parameter space. Such maps of model dynamics are useful tools for systematic empirical tests, which are often more rigorous and complete than the usual checks with particular data sets. Like in theoretical sampling in the tradition of qualitative social studies, they guide the investigator to empirical observations, which are of special interest for model validation. Thus, if the mentioned observations and the related qualitative model predictions systematically coincide, the tested model has a high degree of empirical validity. The use of quantitative computer models as pilots through the space of qualitative social dynamics is illustrated by a simulation model of the mobilization for political protest. Depending on the contagiousness of the conflict and the levels of frustration and repression, the model has three possible qualitative outcomes regarding the dynamics of protest mobilization: extinction, stable positive equilibria, and regular/irregular oscillations. The analysis of the model by computer simulation allows to construct samples of particular parameter configurations, which lead to the mentioned mobilization dynamics and thus may serve for empirical model validation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
If according to Eq. (1) the next following share of mobilized people \(\Delta\)M + M is negative, \(\Delta\)M is adjusted such that \(\Delta\)M = −M.
- 4.
For illustrative purposes the author uses simulation for exploring the behavior of the model, although in the present case analytical solutions are available.
- 5.
If there are doubts about the validity of the interpolated model behavior, it may be recalculated for the observed real case.
References
Lorscheid, I., et al.: Opening the “black box” of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory 18, 22–62 (2012)
Law, A.M.: Simulation Modeling and Analysis, chap. 12, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2007)
Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, chap. 3. Aldine Publishing, Chicago (1975)
Strauss, A., Corbin, J.: Basics of Qualitative Research, chap. 13, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Neumann, M.: Grounded simulation. JASSS 18(1), 9 (2015)
Arnold, E.: Validation of computer simulations from a Kuhnian perspective. In: Beisbart, C., Saam, N.J. (Eds.) Computer Simulation Validation, chap. 8. Springer, Cham (2019)
Troitzsch, K.: Using empirical data for designing, calibrating and validating simulation models. In: Jager, W., et al. (Eds.) Advances in Social Simulation 2015, pp. 413–427. Springer, Cham (2017)
Waldherr, A., Wijermans, N.: Communicating social simulation models to sceptical minds. JASSS 16(4), 13 (2013)
Everitt, B.S.: The Cambridge Dictionary of Statistics, 3rd edn, pp. 119–120. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Robinson, A.P.: Testing simulation models using frequentist statistics. In: Beisbart, C., Saam, N.J. (Eds.) Computer Simulation Validation, chap. 19. Springer, Cham (2019)
Murray-Smith, D.J.: Verification and validation principles from a systems perspective. In: Beisbart, C., Saam, N.J. (Eds.) Computer Simulation Validation, chap. 4. Springer, Cham (2019)
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, pp. 270, 309, 4th edn. Sage, Los Angeles (2015)
Mueller, G.P.: Getting order out of chaos: a mathematical model of political conflict. Russ. Sociol. Rev. 16(4), 37–52 (2017)
Dixon, R.: The logistic family of discrete dynamic models. In: Creedy, J., Vance, M. (Eds.) Chaos and Non-linear Models in Economics, chap. 4. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1994)
Creedy, J., Martin, V.: The strange attraction of chaos in economics. In: Creedy, J., Vance, M. (Eds.) Chaos and Non-linear Models in Economics, chap. 2. Edward Elgar, Aldershot (1994)
Taylor, Ch., Jodice, D.: World Handbook of Political and Social Indicators, vol. 2, tab. 2.1, 3rd edn. Yale University Press, New Haven (1983)
Freedom House: Freedom in the World. Washington DC (2020). https://freedomhouse.org/reports
OECD: Better Life Index, edition 2017. Paris, OECD Publications (2017). https://stats.oecd.org/index.Aspx?DataSetCode=BLI2017 (col.“life satisfacttion”)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mueller, G.P. (2022). Theoretical Sampling and Qualitative Empirical Model Validation. In: Czupryna, M., Kamiński, B. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92843-8_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-92842-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-92843-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)