Skip to main content

Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13069))

Abstract

Legal Judgment Prediction, which aims at predicting the judgment result based on case materials, is an essential task in Legal Intelligence. Most existing studies have analyzed and modeled criminal cases as a whole, while a small part of the research focuses on civil cases which are also significant in the legal system. In these studies, most model on a certain type of civil causes and make the judgment prediction based on the ascertained fact from the perspective of the court. However, in real-world scenarios, there are different civil cases on various causes, and every case is judged from multiple perspectives (i.e., plaintiff, defendant, and the court). It is difficult to make judgment predictions on various civil causes. To address the above challenges, in this paper, we propose a novel Civil Case Judgment (CCJudge) prediction method by simulating the logic of judges. Following this logic, we construct an external knowledge base that contains the explanations and applications of every cause, it helps make the judgment on various causes. Furthermore, a special encoder layer and interaction layer are designed for learning linguistic semantics from multiple perspectives. We conduct extensive experiments on a real-world dataset. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.court.gov.cn/fabu-xiangqing-282031.html.

  2. 2.

    https://www.elastic.co/.

  3. 3.

    https://wenshu.court.gov.cn.

References

  1. An, Y., et al.: LawyerPAN: a proficiency assessment network for trial lawyers. In: Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chalkidis, I., Fergadiotis, M., Malakasiotis, P., Androutsopoulos, I.: Large-scale multi-label text classification on EU legislation. In: ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, H., Cai, D., Dai, W., Dai, Z., Ding, Y.: Charge-based prison term prediction with deep gating network. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., Bengio, Y.: Empirical evaluation of gated recurrent neural networks on sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.3555 (2014)

  5. Cui, Y., et al.: Pre-training with whole word masking for Chinese BERT. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08101 (2019)

  6. Duan, X., et al.: CJRC: a reliable human-annotated benchmark DataSet for Chinese judicial reading comprehension. In: Sun, M., Huang, X., Ji, H., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. (eds.) CCL 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11856, pp. 439–451. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_36

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu, Z., Li, X., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Few-shot charge prediction with discriminative legal attributes. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 487–498 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kim, Y.: Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, 7–9 May 2015, Conference Track Proceedings (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, S., Zhang, H., Ye, L., et al.: Mann: a multichannel attentive neural network for legal judgment prediction. IEEE Access 7, 151144–151155 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Long, S., Tu, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Automatic judgment prediction via legal reading comprehension. In: Sun, M., Huang, X., Ji, H., Liu, Z., Liu, Y. (eds.) CCL 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11856, pp. 558–572. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32381-3_45

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Luo, B., Feng, Y., Xu, J., Zhang, X., Zhao, D.: Learning to predict charges for criminal cases with legal basis. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP. Association for Computational Linguistics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 26: 27th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Press, P.C.: Guidelines on the Applicable Rules of Civil Cases and the Right of Claim of the Supreme People’s Court. People’s Court Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., et al.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Suykens, J.A., Vandewalle, J.: Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process. Lett. 9, 293–300 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, H., et al.: MCNE: an end-to-end framework for learning multiple conditional network representations of social network. In: Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 1064–1072 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, Y., et al.: Equality before the law: legal judgment consistency analysis for fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.13868 (2021)

  20. Wu, Y., et al.: De-biased court’s view generation with causality. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiao, C., et al.: Cail 2018: a large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02478 (2018)

  22. Xiong, C., Zhong, V., Socher, R.: Dynamic coattention networks for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01604 (2016)

  23. Xu, Z., Li, X., Li, Y., Wang, Z., Fanxu, Y., Lai, X.: Multi-task legal judgement prediction combining a subtask of the seriousness of charges. In: Sun, M., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., He, S., Rao, G. (eds.) CCL 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12522, pp. 415–429. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63031-7_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, W., Jia, W., Zhou, X., Luo, Y.: Legal judgment prediction via multi-perspective bi-feedback network. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yue, L., et al.: NeurJudge: a circumstance-aware neural framework for legal judgment prediction. In: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yue, L., et al.: Circumstances enhanced criminal court view generation. In: Proceedings of the 44th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong, H., Guo, Z., Tu, C., Xiao, C., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: Legal judgment prediction via topological learning. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhong, H., Xiao, C., Tu, C., Zhang, T., Liu, Z., Sun, M.: How does NLP benefit legal system: a summary of legal artificial intelligence. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2020, Online, 5–10 July 2020 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Sun, C., Si, L.: Legal intelligence for e-commerce: multi-task learning by leveraging multiview dispute representation. In: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zou, B.: The Nine Steps of Trial of Essential Items. Law Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2018YFC0832101), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61922073).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qi Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, L. et al. (2021). Legal Judgment Prediction with Multiple Perspectives on Civil Cases. In: Fang, L., Chen, Y., Zhai, G., Wang, J., Wang, R., Dong, W. (eds) Artificial Intelligence. CICAI 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13069. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93046-2_60

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-93045-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-93046-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics