Skip to main content

On the Systematic Analysis of Process Landscape Method Implementation Using Grounded Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 436))

Abstract

Process Landscapes are critical elements towards the systematic management of a process portfolio, representing its process architecture from a high-level perspective. Consequently, a wide range of methods to generate Process Landscapes is available in the literature, whose effectiveness has been extensively validated, mostly through case studies. However, little is known or reported about the implementation of landscape methods with the human team, e.g. facilitators, common pitfalls, or lessons learned. To fill this research gap, this article proposes the Landscape Method Implementation Grounded Theory based evaluation (LanMI-GT) procedure for the systematic analysis of a landscape method implementation through Grounded Theory. This was generated using a Design Science Research approach. The contribution of this work is twofold. First, the proposed procedure would enable practitioners to systematically analyze the implementation with a human team of a specific landscape method. Second, the procedure is demonstrated by analyzing a well-known Process Landscape Method in a real context, and the findings thereof are discussed in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining - Data Science in Action. Springer, Heidelberg (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49851-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Abbad Andaloussi, A., Davis, C.J., Burattin, A., López, H.A., Slaats, T., Weber, B.: Understanding quality in declarative process modeling through the mental models of experts. In: Fahland, D., Ghidini, C., Becker, J., Dumas, M. (eds.) BPM 2020. LNCS, vol. 12168, pp. 417–434. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58666-9_24

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bider, I., Perjons, E., Elias, M., Johannesson, P.: A fractal enterprise model and its application for business development. Softw. Syst. Model. 16(3), 663–689 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton, H.O., Pennotti, M.C.: The enterprise map: a system for implementing strategy and achieving operational excellence. Eng. Manag. J. 15(3), 15–20 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory. Introducing Qualitative Methods Series. SAGE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dijkman, R., Vanderfeesten, I., Reijers, H.A.: Business process architectures: overview, comparison and framework. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 12(2), 129–158 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumas, M., La Rosa, M., Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A.: Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dumont, T., Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Towards multi-dimensional clustering of business process models using latent Dirichlet allocation. In: MKWI 2016, pp. 69–80 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glaser, B., Strauss, A.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Publishing Company (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gonzalez-Lopez, F., Bustos, G.: Business process architecture design methodologies - a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 25(6), 1317–1334 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gonzalez-Lopez, F., Bustos, G.: Evaluating methodologies for business process architecture design - a pilot study. In: ZEUS 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Lopez, F., Munoz-Gama, J., Fabia, P., Jara, A.: Technical report: on the systematic analysis of process landscape method implementation using grounded theory (2021). trlanmigt.haplab.org

  13. Green, S., Ould, M.: A framework for classifying and evaluating process architecture methods. SPIP 10(4), 415–425 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Green, S., Ould, M.A.: The primacy of process architecture. In: CAiSE Workshops, pp. 154–159 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gruhn, V., Köhler, A.: Modelling, analysis and improvement of mobile business processes with the MPL method. In: ICEIS 2009, pp. 89–94 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harmon, P., García, J.: The state of business process management 2020 - a BPTrends report (2020). https://www.bptrends.com

  17. Harmon, P.: Business Process Change: A Business Process Management Guide for Managers and Process Professionals. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kudryavtsev, D., Grigoriev, L.: Systemic approach towards enterprise functional decomposition. In: CEC 2011, pp. 310–317 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malinova, M., Leopold, H., Mendling, J.: An empirical investigation on the design of process architectures. In: Alt, R., Franczyk, B. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 2, pp. 1197–1211 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moody, D., Sindre, G., Brasethvik, T., Solvberg, A.: Evaluating the quality of information models: empirical testing of a conceptual model quality framework. In: ICSE 2003, pp. 295–305 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pesantes, M., Mitre, H.A., Lemus, C.: Evaluation of process architecture design methods. In: Murgante, B., et al. (eds.) ICCSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7973, pp. 144–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39646-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Poels, G., García, F., Ruiz, F., Piattini, M.: Architecting business process maps. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 17(1), 117–139 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Recker, J.: Scientific Research in Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30048-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Sage (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U.: Method engineering in information systems analysis and design. Softw. Syst. Model. 18, 1833–1857 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. The Open Group: ArchiMate 3.0.1 Specification (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Nuffel, D., De Backer, M.: Multi-abstraction layered business process modeling. Comput. Ind. 63(2), 131–147 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by ANID FONDECYT project 3210147.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fernanda Gonzalez-Lopez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gonzalez-Lopez, F., Munoz-Gama, J., Fabia, P., Jara, A. (2022). On the Systematic Analysis of Process Landscape Method Implementation Using Grounded Theory. In: Marrella, A., Weber, B. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 436. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94343-1_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94342-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94343-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics