Skip to main content

A Study on Metrics for Concept Drift Detection Based on Predictions and Parameters of Ensemble Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services (MobiQuitous 2021)

Abstract

The performance of machine learning models deteriorates when the distribution of test data changes, which is called concept drift. One way to deal with concept drift is to continuously rebuild the model. If we want to minimize the frequency of rebuilding due to some constraints, however, it is important to detect concept drift as the timing when rebuilding is truly necessary. Taking advantage of ensemble models for concept drift detection may improve the detection accuracy. However, the behavior of ensemble model’s predictions and parameters in the presence of concept drift has not been fully investigated. In this study, we investigated how the ensemble models constructed by two different methods behave in the presence of concept drift. In the experiments, we monitored some metrics including the metrics that can be calculated only by the ensemble model and the metrics based on the model parameters. As a result, we found that the metrics show some behaviors that seem to be influenced by concept drift, suggesting that the detection accuracy of concept drift may be improved by using these metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A series of processes including preprocessing, model training, data and model validation, and inference using the model.

References

  1. MLOps: Continuous delivery and automation pipelines in machine learning, https://cloud.google.com/architecture/mlops-continuous-delivery-and-automation-pipelines-in-machine-learning. Accessed 29 July 2021

  2. Korycki, Ł., Krawczyk, B.: Class-incremental experience replay for continual learning under concept drift. In: CVPR Workshops (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lindstrom, P., Mac Namee, B., Delany, S.J.: Drift detection using uncertainty distribution divergence. In: ICDM Workshops (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao, Y., et al.: SUOD: accelerating large-scale unsupervised heterogeneous outlier detection. In: MLSys (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fort, S., Hu, H., Lakshminarayanan, B.: Deep ensembles: a loss landscape perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.02757v2 (2020)

  6. Lu, J., Liu, A., Dong, F., Gu, F., Gama, J., Zhang, G.: Learning under concept drift: a review. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 31(12), 2346–2363 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lu, N., Zhang, G., Lu, J.: Concept drift detection via competence models. Artif. Intell. 209, 11–28 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ditzler, G., Polikar, R.: Hellinger distance based drift detection for nonstationary environments. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Qahtan, A., Wang, S.: A pca-based change detection framework for multidimensional data streams categories and subject descriptors. In: KDD (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gama, J., Medas, P., Castillo, G., Rodrigues, P.: Learning with drift detection. In: Bazzan, A.L.C., Labidi, S. (eds.) SBIA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3171, pp. 286–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-28645-5_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sethi, T.S., Kantardzic, M.: On the reliable detection of concept drift from streaming unlabeled data. Expert Syst. Appl. 82, 77–99 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smutz, C., Stavrou, A.: When a tree falls: using diversity in ensemble classifiers to identify evasion in malware detectors. In: Proceedings 2016 Network and Distributed System Security (NDSS) Symposium, pp. 21–24. Internet Society, Reston (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haug, J., Kasneci, G.: Learning parameter distributions to detect concept drift in data streams. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tran, L., et al.: Hydra: preserving ensemble diversity for model distillation. In: ICML 2020 Workshop on Uncertainty and Robustness in Deep Learning (UDL) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A., Blundel, C.: Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. In: NeurIPS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml. Accessed 29 July 2021

  17. Maas, A.L., Hannun, A.Y., Ng, A.Y.: Rectifier nonlinearities improve neural network acoustic models. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stewart, G.W.: The efficient generation of random orthogonal matrices with an application to condition estimators. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17, 403–409 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baier, L., Schlör, T., Schöffer, J., Kühl, N.: Detecting concept drift with neural network model uncertainty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.01873 (2021)

  21. Montiel, J., Read, J., Bifet, A., Abdessalem, T.: Scikit-multiflow: a multi-output streaming framework. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 19(72), 1–5 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., Lee, H., Hinton, G.: Similarity of neural network representations revisited. In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cortes, C., Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A.: Algorithms for learning kernels based on centered alignment. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13, 795–828 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Ovadia, Y., et al.: Can you trust your model’s uncertainty? evaluating predictive uncertainty under dataset shift. In: NeurIPS (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is partially supported by JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR21F2.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Yonekawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Yonekawa, K., Haruta, S., Konishi, T., Saito, K., Asoh, H., Kurokawa, M. (2022). A Study on Metrics for Concept Drift Detection Based on Predictions and Parameters of Ensemble Model. In: Hara, T., Yamaguchi, H. (eds) Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. MobiQuitous 2021. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 419. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94822-1_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94822-1_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94821-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94822-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics