Skip to main content

An Adjustable Diversity Metric for Multimodal Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA 2022)

Abstract

The performance of multimodal multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MMEAs) is determined by not only the convergence to the Pareto front in the objective space, but also the distribution spread to the Pareto set in the decision space. Comparing with the performance matrix applied in the objective space, the performance assessment in the decision space should pay more attention to the distribution spread of solutions. This paper presents a novel diversity metric (PSCR) to reveal the distribution spread of a solution set to the pareto set in the decision space. In addition, in order to avoid the influence of boundary individuals, the grid-partition method is adopted. Through adjusting the scale of the grid, the proposed PSCR could evaluate the MMEAs on both coarse-grained and fine-grained way. The test is carried out on 6 test functions and the reasonable range of parameters is discussed. Moreover, the results of 21 experiments were measured with metrics, and PSCR was compared with other metrics. It was proved that PSCR could not only accurately measure the performance of the algorithm, but also had a higher degree of differentiation than the other metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trivedi, A., Srinivasan, D., Sanyal, K., et al.: A survey of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 21(3), 440–462 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liang, J., Yue, C., Qu, B.: Multimodal multi-objective optimization: a preliminary study. In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 2454–2461 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Van Veldhuizen, D.A., Lamont, G.B.: On measuring multiobjective evolutionary algorithm performance. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC00 (Cat. No. 00TH8512), pp. 1: 204–211(2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, J., Azarm, S.: Metrics for quality assessment of a multiobjective design optimization solution set. J. Mech. Des. 123(1), 18–25 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schott, J.R.: Fault Tolerant Design Using Single and Multicriteria Genetic Algorithm Optimization. cellular immunology (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, A., Jin, Y., Zhang, Q., et al.: Combining model-based and genetics-based offspring generation for multi-objective optimization using a convergence criterion. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, pp. 892–899(2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. While, L., Hingston, P., Barone, L., et al.: A faster algorithm for calculating hypervolume. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(1), 29–38 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tan, K., Lee, T., Khor, E.: Evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization: performance assessments and comparisons. Artif. Intell. Rev. 17(4), 251–290 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L.: Comparison of multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: empirical results. Evol. Comput. 8(2), 173–195 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, H., Jin, Y., Yao, X.: Diversity assessment in many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 47(6), 1510–1522 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yue, C., Qu, B., Yu, K., et al.: A novel scalable test problem suite for multimodal multiobjective optimization. Swarm Evolut. Comput. 48, 62–71 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yue, C., Liang, J., Qu, B., et al.: Multimodal multiobjective optimization in feature selection. In: 2019 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 302–309 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, A., Zhang, Q., Jin, Y.: Approximating the set of Pareto-optimal solutions in both the decision and objective spaces by an estimation of distribution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13(5), 1167–1189 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., et al.: Diversity assessment of multi-objective evolutionary algorithms: performance metric and benchmark problems. IEEE Comput. Intell. Mag. 14(3), 61–74 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yue, C., Qu, B., Liang, J.: A multiobjective particle swarm optimizer using ring topology for solving multimodal multiobjective problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 22(5), 805–817 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Q., Zhou, A., Jin, Y.: RM-MEDA: a regularity model-based multiobjective estimation of distribution algorithm. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 12(1), 41–63 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, Y., Yen, G., Gong, D.: A multimodal multiobjective evolutionary algorithm using two-archive and recombination strategies. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 23(4), 660–674 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schütze, O., Mostaghim, S., Dellnitz, M., et al.: Covering Pareto sets by multilevel evolutionary subdivision techniques. In: International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization, pp. 118–132 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gong, M., Jiao, L., Du, H., et al.: Multiobjective immune algorithm with nondominated neighbor-based selection. Evolut. Comput. 16(2), 225–255 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qu, B., Li, C., Liang, J., et al.: A self-organized speciation based multi-objective particle swarm optimizer for multimodal multi-objective problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 86, 105886 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The paper is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51905494, 61501405), Funding program for key scientific research projects of universities in Henan province (No. 20A520004), science and technology key project of Henan province (No. 212102210154), Training plan of young backbone teachers in Colleges and universities of Henan Province (No. 2019GGJS138).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhang, W., Fan, Y., Zhang, N., Zhang, W. (2022). An Adjustable Diversity Metric for Multimodal Multi-objective Evolutionary Algorithms. In: Li, B., et al. Advanced Data Mining and Applications. ADMA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13087. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95405-5_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95405-5_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95404-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95405-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics