Skip to main content

Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for the Experimental Classification and Clustering of Higher Education Institutions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Information Systems (EMCIS 2021)

Abstract

Higher education institutions have a big impact on the future of skills supplied on the labour market. It means that depending on the changes in labour market, higher education institutions are making changes to fields of study or adding new ones to fulfil the demand on labour market. The significant changes on labour market caused by digital transformation, resulted in new jobs and new skills. Because of the necessity of computer skills, general universities started to offer various courses on IT, including computer science that was originally offered by technical universities. It is also possible to have selected medical studies not only at medical universities but also in private colleges, e.g., nursing studies. As a result, the current classification of higher education institutions used in official statistics can be revised. The paper shows the experimental work on the use of machine learning methods to classify and cluster higher education institutions in Poland. Different attributes were used to classify the type of institution, including fields of studies, programme orientation and others. The aim of the paper was also to evaluate various machine learning methods in the process of classifying or clustering and validating the associated types of higher education institutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Woźnicki, J.: Deregulacja w systemie szkolnictwa wyższego. Program rozwoju szkolnictwa wyższego do 2020 r. Część V, FRP, KRASP, Warszawa (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. POL-on. Higher education institutions (2021). https://polon.nauka.gov.pl/opi/aa/rejestry/szkolnictwo?execution=e7s1. Accessed 20 Oct 2021

  3. Antonowicz, D.: Stopniowe różnicowanie systemu szkolnictwa wyższego i jego konsekwencje. Seria Raportów Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM. Poznań (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Act of July 20, 2018, Law on Higher Education and Science (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Higher education schools and their finances, Statistics Poland (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jalote, P., Jain, B.N., Sopory, S.: Classification for research universities in India. High. Educ. 79(2), 225–241 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00406-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin, J.C.: Classifying higher education institutions in Korea: a performance-based approach. High. Educ. 57, 247–266 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9150-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hermanowicz, J.C.: Classifying universities and their departments: a social world perspective. J. High. Educ. 76(1), 26–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2005.0005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Vught, F.A., Kaiser, F., File, J.M., Gaethgens, C., Westerheijden, D.F.: U-map: the European classification of higher education institutions. Center for Higher Education Policy Studies – CHEPS, Enschede (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ziegele, F.: Classification of higher education institutions: the European case. Pensamiento educativo. Rev. Invest. Educ. Latinoamericana 50(1), 76–95 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/PEL.50.1.2013.7

  11. Szadkowski, K.: Globalne rankingi uniwersytetów a długoterminowa strategia wzmacniania pozycji polskich uczelni. Seria Raportów Centrum Studiów nad Polityką Publiczną UAM, Poznań (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar, R., Pattnaik, P.K.: Graph Theory. Laxmi Publications Pvt Ltd. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Razmjooy, N., Estrela, V., Loschi, H.: A study of metaheuristic-based neural networks for image segmentation purposes. In: Memon, Q., Khoja, S. (eds.) Data Science. Theory, Analysis, and Applications. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alloghani, M., Al-Jumeily, D., Mustafina, J., Hussain, A., Aljaaf, A.J.: A Systematic review of supervised and unsupervised machine learning algorithms for data science. In: Berry, M.W., Mohamed, A., Wah Yap B. (eds.) Supervised and Unsupervised Learning for Data Science. Unsupervised and Semi-supervised Learning, pp. 3–21. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22475-2_1

  15. Albalate, A., Minker, W.: Semi-Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning: Novel Strategies, pp. 1–320. Wiley (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu, W., Singh, R.R.P., Scalettar, R.T.: Discovering phases, phase transitions, and crossovers through unsupervised machine learning: a critical examination. Phys. Rev. E. 95(6), 14 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.062122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nahili, W., Rezeg, K., Kazar, O.: A new corpus-based convolutional neural network for big data text analytics. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business 9(2), 59–71 (2019). https://doi.org/10.37380/jisib.v9i2.469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ramesh, V.P., Baskaran, P., Krishnamoorthy, A., Damodaran, D., Sadasivam, P.: Back propagation neural network based big data analytics for a stock market challenge. Commun. Stat.: Theory Methods 48(14), 3622–3642 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1478103

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Chong, A.Y.L., Ch’ng, E., Liu, M.J., Li, B.: Predicting consumer product demands via big data: the roles of online promotional marketing and online reviews. Int. J. Prod. Res. 55(17), 5142–5156 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1066519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Paliouras, G., Papatheodorou, C., Karkaletsis, V., Spyropoulos, C.D.: Discovering user communities on the Internet using unsupervised machine learning techniques. Interact. Comput. 14(6), 761–791 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(02)00015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maślankowski, J.: Towards de-duplication framework in big data analysis: a case study. In: Wrycza, S. (ed.) SIGSAND/PLAIS 2016. LNBIP, vol. 264, pp. 104–113. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46642-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacek Maślankowski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Maślankowski, J., Brzezicki, Ł. (2022). Evaluation of Machine Learning Methods for the Experimental Classification and Clustering of Higher Education Institutions. In: Themistocleous, M., Papadaki, M. (eds) Information Systems. EMCIS 2021. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95947-0_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-95946-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-95947-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics