Abstract
This short paper explores the tensions inherent in intellectual property law and freedom of expression from a UK perspective. It considers the barriers IP law puts in place to creative ideas and free expression, and the impact of the changes in UK law in 2014 that enhanced exceptions for key areas such as criticism, and parody and pastiche. It considers some key case law that tested the boundaries of the law in relation to free expression, and considers whether the 2014 exceptions favor a broader approach to freedom of expression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Gowers, A.: Gowers review of intellectual property. The Stationery Office (2006). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228849/0118404830.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2021
Hargreaves, I.: Digital opportunity: a review of intellectual property and growth: an independent report. (2011). https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32563/ipreview-finalreport.pdf. Accessed 30 Apr 2021
Wheeldon, J.: Patrons, Curators, Inventors and Thieves. Palgrave, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230306677
Craig, C.J.: Copyright, Communication and Culture. Edward Elgar MUA, Cheltenham (2012)
Torremans, P.: Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law, 7th edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013)
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988
Bainbridge, D.I.: Intellectual Property, 9th edn. Pearson, London (2012)
Cameron, A.: Copyright exceptions for the digital age: new rights of private copying, parody and quotation. J. Intellect. Prop. Law Pract. 9, 1002 (2014)
Copyright and Rights in Performances (Quotation and Parody) Regulations 2014
Johan Deckmyn and Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others C-201/13, EU:C:2014:2132
The Copyright and Rights in Performances (Research, Education, Libraries and Archives) Regulations 2014 No. 1372
Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1985] QB 526
Initial Services v Putterill [1968] 1 QB 396
Ashdown v Telegraph Group Ltd [2001] RPC 34
Attorney General v Guardian Newspapers [1988] 3 All ER 567
Duchess of Sussex v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 273 (Ch)
Hawkes & Sons (London) Ltd v Paramount Film Service [1934] Ch 593
Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 W.L.R. 273
England and Wales Cricket Board Ltd –v Tixdaq Ltd [2016] EWHC 575 (Ch)
Hubbard v Vosper [1972] 2 QB 84
Baigent v Random House [2007] EWCA Civ 247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
McMenemy, D. (2022). Tensions Between Intellectual Property Law and Freedom of Expression: A UK Perspective. In: Smits, M. (eds) Information for a Better World: Shaping the Global Future. iConference 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13192. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96957-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-96956-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-96957-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)