Skip to main content

Inter-task Similarity Measure for Heterogeneous Tasks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13132))

Abstract

A long term goal in robotics is lifelong learning, in which a robot learns to perform new tasks without human intervention. For this a promising alternative is reinforcement learning (RL), in which an agent learns how to solve sequential decision-making problems by interacting with its environment. Despite the effectiveness of RL, learning in a trial-and-error way can be infeasible in robotics applications, in which long training periods can significantly deteriorate hardware. For robots that face long sequences of tasks, transfer learning represents an alternative to reduce training time, by transferring knowledge from previously learned tasks. However, in domains such as service robotics, identifying reusable pieces of knowledge and transferring them across tasks can be challenging, due to the mismatch between the state-action spaces (heterogeneous tasks). Thus, in this article we present an inter-task similarity measure and a transfer learning method for heterogeneous tasks. Through experimental evaluations, we show that the proposed measure is able to rank tasks in a way that prioritizes those that cause a larger increment of the learning performance in a target task. Additionally, results show that for some tasks the similarity measure can be computed with few data, enabling significant speedups in the learning process by transferring knowledge at an early stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ammar, H.B., et al.: An automated measure of MDP similarity for transfer in reinforcement learning. In: Workshops at the Twenty-Eighth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bellman, R.E.: Dynamic programming (1957)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brockman, G., et al.: Openai gym (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carroll, J.L., Seppi, K.: Task similarity measures for transfer in reinforcement learning task libraries. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 2, pp. 803–808. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferns, N., Panangaden, P., Precup, D.: Metrics for finite Markov decision processes. In: UAI, vol. 4, pp. 162–169 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferns, N., Panangaden, P., Precup, D.: Metrics for Markov decision processes with infinite state spaces. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.1386 (2012)

  7. Henrikson, J.: Completeness and total boundedness of the Hausdorff metric. MIT Undergraduate J. Math. 1, 69–80 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kober, J., Bagnell, J.A., Peters, J.: Reinforcement learning in robotics: a survey. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32(11), 1238–1274 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin, K., Wang, S., Zhou, J.: Collaborative deep reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05796 (2017)

  10. Puterman, M.L.: Markov Decision Processes: Discrete Stochastic Dynamic Programming. Wiley, Hoboken (2014)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Song, J., Gao, Y., Wang, H., An, B.: Measuring the distance between finite Markov decision processes. In: Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, pp. 468–476 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sorg, J., Singh, S.: Transfer via soft homomorphisms. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 741–748 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor, M.E., Kuhlmann, G., Stone, P.: Autonomous transfer for reinforcement learning. In: AAMAS (1), pp. 283–290. Citeseer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Taylor, M.E., Stone, P.: Representation transfer for reinforcement learning. In: AAAI Fall Symposium: Computational Approaches to Representation Change during Learning and Development, pp. 78–85 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor, M.E., Stone, P.: Transfer learning for reinforcement learning domains: a survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10(Jul), 1633–1685 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Wan, M., Gangwani, T., Peng, J.: Mutual information based knowledge transfer under state-action dimension mismatch. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.07041 (2020)

  17. Watkins, C.J., Dayan, P.: Q-learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 279–292 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio A. Serrano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Serrano, S.A., Martinez-Carranza, J., Sucar, L.E. (2022). Inter-task Similarity Measure for Heterogeneous Tasks. In: Alami, R., Biswas, J., Cakmak, M., Obst, O. (eds) RoboCup 2021: Robot World Cup XXIV. RoboCup 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13132. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98682-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98682-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98681-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98682-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics