Skip to main content

Two-Tier Trust Structure Model for Dynamic Supply Chain Formulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 451))

Abstract

With the ongoing development of DX, the linkage between physical and cyber environments is expanding and is increasingly being applied to business aspects such as supply chains. At the same time, cyber-attacks are becoming more diversified, and information security is becoming more and more important. The Information Security White Paper 2019 reported that one of the most pressing issues in the supply chain is that the scope of responsibility between the contractor and subcontractor is unclear. In this paper, we propose a two-tier trust structure model featuring inter-organizational security policy matching for dynamic supply chains that recombines subcontractors for each contract. The proposed structure consists of a trust model at the contractor side and a zero-trust model between the contractor and the subcontractor. The results of qualitative evaluation show that this two-tier model can help clarify the scope of responsibility in dynamic supply chains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. IPA: 10 Major Threats to Information Security 2021 (2021). (in Japanese), https://www.ipa.go.jp/security/vuln/10threats2021.html

  2. Kubo, T., et al.: Study of information security in the supply chain. IPSJ, DPS 161(3), 1–8 (2014). (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IPA: Information Security White Paper 2019 (2019). https://www.ipa.go.jp/security/publications/hakusyo/2019.html

  4. Tanimizu, Y., et al.: A study on development of adaptive strategies in dynamic supply chains (proposal of a framework and two-layered models). Trans. JSME 75(756), 2351–2358 (2009). (in Japanese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. METI: The 2021 edition of the White Paper on Trade and Commerce, p. 91 (2021). (in Japanese), https://www.meti.go.jp/report/tsuhaku2021/pdf/02-01-02.pdf

  6. Sato, K., et al.: Study of dynamic supply chain model for improvement of efficiency in inter-business trading. In: Proceedings of the School of Information and Telecommunication Engineering, Tokai University, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 36–44 (2017). (in Japanese), https://www.ipa.go.jp/security/publications/hakusyo/2019.html

  7. IPA: Research Report on Security Incidents and Management in Outsourced IT Supply Chain Operations (2018). https://www.ipa.go.jp/security/fy29/reports/scrm/index.html

  8. Corbett, C.J., et al.: Designing supply contracts: contract type and information asymmetry. Manag. Sci. 50(4), 550–559 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manuj, I., et al.: Global supply chain risk management. J. Bossiness Logist. 29(1), 133–155 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang, H., et al.: Security and trust issues on digital supply chain. In: CyberSciTech 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Williams, Z., et al.: Supply chain security: an overview and research agenda. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 19(2), 254–281 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Juttner, U., et al.: Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 6(4), 197–210 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aslam, H., et al.: Determining the antecedents of dynamic supply chain capabilities. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 25(4), 427–442 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, M., et al.: Agent-based negotiation and decision making for dynamic supply chain formation. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22(7), 1046–1055 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Palmo, Y., et al.: IoT reliability improvement method for secure supply chain management. In: GCCE2021, pp. 390–391 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  16. CSA: Software Defined Perimeter Working Group, SDP Specification 1.0 (2014). https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/artifacts/sdp-specification-v1-0/

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 19H04098.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shigeaki Tanimoto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tanimoto, S., Watanabe, Y., Sato, H., Kanai, A. (2022). Two-Tier Trust Structure Model for Dynamic Supply Chain Formulation. In: Barolli, L., Hussain, F., Enokido, T. (eds) Advanced Information Networking and Applications. AINA 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 451. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99619-2_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics