Skip to main content

Joint Personalized Search and Recommendation with Hypergraph Convolutional Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13185))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Traditionally, the search and recommendation tasks are performed separately, by distinct models. Having a unique model for the two tasks is however particularly appealing for platforms that offer search and recommendation services to a shared user base over common items. In this paper, we study this unification scenario denoted as Joint Personalized Search and Recommendation (JPSR). To tackle this problem, we introduce HyperSaR, an hypergraph convolutional approach for search and recommendation. From the interaction data, we first build an hypergraph composed of user, item and query keyword nodes in which recommendation instances form user-item edges and search instances define user-item-query hyperedges. We then propagate user, item and query keyword embeddings using hypergraph convolution, and train HyperSaR with the combination of two complementary losses. The first one amounts to assessing the probability of an interaction, while the second one aims at predicting the query of a search interaction given a (user, item) pair. The proposed method is evaluated on the JPSR task using three datasets: a real-world, industrial dataset, and the public MovieLens and Lastfm datasets, which have been adapted to the task. Our experiments demonstrate the superior effectiveness of HyperSaR over competing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/naver/hypersar.

  2. 2.

    In practice, query keywords are obtained by retaining frequent query terms and discarding stop words (see Sect. 5.3). One could alternatively extract intents using query intent understanding techniques (e.g.,  [29]) but this is beyond the scope of this work.

  3. 3.

    Some previous works [1,2,3, 11, 27, 28] used Amazon datasets for product search. However the common practice [19] is to define synthetic queries from product categories, which do not result from a user-specific expression. Therefore, we advocate that such datasets are not suitable for personalized search and, a fortiori, for JPSR.

  4. 4.

    https://www.naver.com/.

  5. 5.

    https://grouplens.org/datasets/movielens/25m/.

  6. 6.

    https://grouplens.org/datasets/hetrec-2011/.

  7. 7.

    For these approaches, the search instances are simply considered as user-item pairs by ignoring queries. The same interaction set is then used as for other methods.

  8. 8.

    Originally, JSR is based on text descriptions attached to items; we adapt the approach to the JPSR task by using the queries in replacement of item descriptions and by linking each query to its interaction instead of its item.

  9. 9.

    https://fasttext.cc/.

  10. 10.

    In our setting, items are not associated with text documents, preventing the usage of standard retrieval methods. To apply BM25, we form documents by concatenating training queries pertaining to the same item, and use them for retrieval on test queries.

  11. 11.

    https://github.com/naver/hypersar.

References

  1. Ai, Q., Vishwanathan, S.V., Hill, D.N., Bruce Croft, W.: A zero attention model for personalized product search. In: CIKM, pp. 379–388 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ai, Q., Zhang, Y., Bi, K., Bruce Croft, W.: Explainable product search with a dynamic relation embedding model. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 38(1) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ai, Q., Zhang, Y., Bi, K., Chen, X., Bruce Croft, W.: Learning a hierarchical embedding model for personalized product search. In: SIGIR, pp. 645–654 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bai, S., Zhang, F., Torr, P.H.: Hypergraph convolution and hypergraph attention. Pattern Recognit. 110, 1–30 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, L., Wu, L., Hong, R., Zhang, K., Wang, M.: Revisiting graph based collaborative filtering: a linear residual graph convolutional network approach. In: AAAI, pp. 27–34 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dong, Y., Sawin, W., Bengio, Y.: HNHN: hypergraph networks with hyperedge neurons. arXiv:2006.12278 (2020)

  7. Feng, Y., You, H., Zhang, Z., Ji, R., Gao, Y.: Hypergraph neural networks. In: AAAI, pp. 3558–3565 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, H., Tang, R., Ye, Y., Li, Z., He, X.: DeepFM: a factorization-machine based neural network for CTR prediction. In: IJCAI, pp. 1725–1731 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, X., Deng, K., Wang, X., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, M.: LightGCN: simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. In: SIGIR, pp. 639–648 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koren, Y., Bell, R.M., Volinsky, C.: Matrix factorization techniques for recommender systems. Computer 42(8), 30–37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, S., Gu, W., Cong, G., Zhang, F.: Structural relationship representation learning with graph embedding for personalized product search. In: CIKM, pp. 915–924 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Park, E.L., Cho, S.: KoNLPy: Korean natural language processing in Python. In: HCLT (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rendle, S.: Factorization machines. In: ICDM, pp. 995–1000 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rendle, S., Freudenthaler, C., Gantner, Z., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. In: UAI, pp. 452–461 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rendle, S., Krichene, W., Zhang, L., Anderson, J.: Neural collaborative filtering vs. matrix factorization revisited. arXiv:2005.09683 (2020)

  16. Rong, Y., Huang, W., Xu, T., Huang, J.: DropEdge: towards deep graph convolutional networks on node classification. In: ICLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sparck Jones, K., Walker, S., Robertson, S.E.: A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments - Part 2. Inf. Process. Manage. 36(6), 809–840 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Srivastava, N., Hinton, G., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R.: Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15(1), 1929–1958 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Gysel, C., de Rijke, M., Kanoulas, E.: Learning latent vector spaces for product search. In: CIKM, pp. 165–174 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wang, J., Ding, K., Hong, L., Liu, H., Caverlee, J.: Next-item recommendation with sequential hypergraphs. In: SIGIR, pp. 1101–1110 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, J., Ding, K., Zhu, Z., Caverlee, J.: Session-based recommendation with hypergraph attention networks. In: SDM, pp. 82–90 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, X., He, X., Wang, M., Feng, F., Chua, T.S.: Neural graph collaborative filtering. In: SIGIR, pp. 165–174 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wu, F., Zhang, T., de Souza, A.H., Fifty, C., Yu, T., Weinberger, K.Q.: Simplifying graph convolutional networks. In: ICML, pp. 11884–11894 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wu, S., Zhang, W., Sun, F., Cui, B.: Graph neural networks in recommender systems: a survey. arXiv:2011.02260 (2020)

  25. Wu, T., et al.: Zero-shot heterogeneous transfer learning from recommender systems to cold-start search retrieval. In: CIKM, pp. 2821–2828 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ying, R., He, R., Chen, K., Eksombatchai, P., Hamilton, W.L., Leskovec, J.: Graph convolutional neural networks for web-scale recommender systems. In: KDD, pp. 974–983 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zamani, H., Croft, W.B.: Joint modeling and optimization of search and recommendation. In: DESIRES, pp. 36–41 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zamani, H., Croft, W.B.: Learning a joint search and recommendation model from user-item interactions. In: WSDM, pp. 717–725 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, R., Guo, J., Fan, Y., Lan, Y., Cheng, X.: Query understanding via intent description generation. In: CIKM, pp. 1823–1832 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, Y., Chen, X., Ai, Q., Yang, L., Croft, W.B.: Towards conversational search and recommendation: system ask, user respond. In: CIKM, pp. 177–186 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thibaut Thonet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Thonet, T., Renders, JM., Choi, M., Kim, J. (2022). Joint Personalized Search and Recommendation with Hypergraph Convolutional Networks. In: Hagen, M., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99735-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99736-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics