Skip to main content

User-Based Evaluation of the Slovenian Version of Information Literacy Online – A Multilingual MOOC for Information Literacy: Methodology and Preliminary Results

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era (ECIL 2021)

Abstract

We present a qualitative evaluation of Information Literacy Online (ILO) – a multilingual MOOC for Information Literacy (IL). We evaluated the Slovene version using diary and interview methods. Evaluation was aimed at the user perceptions and user-perceived usefulness of content. The convenience sample consisted of 12 experienced LIS masters students. who completed all modules in 6 weeks in November/December, 2019. Students kepta diary, following the pre-defined evaluation framework, marking each element as present/absent and commenting on its realization from the point of view of user perceptions and usefulness of content. After completing each module they answered three open-ended questions on perceived success and emotions during the course, perceived usefulness of acquired knowledge, and positive and negative experiences. The results indicate some positive impressions and some areas to be improved. Findings are valuable guidelines for further ILO development and a boost to its use to promote IL within formal education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bozkurt, A., Akgün-Özbek, E., Zawacki-Richter, O.: Trends and patterns in massive open online courses: review and content analysis of research on MOOCs (2008–2015). Int. Rev. Res. Open Distr. Learn. 18(5), 118–147 (2017). http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/3080/4284

  2. Ballester, S.: MOOC as a tool for teacher training. In: Elearning Comunication Open-Data, 14 December 2016. http://project.ecolearning.eu/mooc-tool-teachertraining/

  3. Bates, A.W.: Teaching in a Digital Age (2015). https://opentextbc.ca/teachinginadigitalage/

  4. Rush, L.: Examining student perceptions of their knowledge, roles and power in the information cycle: findings from a ‘fake news’ event. J. Inf. Lit. 12(2), 121–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.11645/12.2.2484

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Wittkower, L.R., Wittkower, D.E.: Short circuits in the ınformation cycle: addressing ınformation breakdowns using the ınformation literacy framework. J. Sociotech. Critique 1(1), 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.25779/adg9-pp62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Libbrecht, P., Dreisiebner, S., Buchal, B., Polzer, A.: Creating multilingual MOOC content for ınformation literacy: a workflow. In: Conference on Learning Information Literacy across the Globe, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, 10 May 2019. https://informationliteracy.eu/conference/assets/papers/LILG-2019_Libbrecht-et-al_Creating_ILO_MOOC.pdf

  7. Dreisiebner, S., Žumer, M., Vilar, P., Mandl, T.: Evaluation of a MOOC to promote ınformation literacy: first evaluation results. In: Bago, K., et al. (eds.) The Future of Information Sciences: 7th International Conference INFuture2019: Knowledge in the Digital Age, Zagreb, 21–22 November 2019, pp. 106–112. (2019). https://infoz.ffzg.hr/infuture/images/papers/INFuture%202019%20Proceedings.pdf, https://doi.org/10.17234/INFUTURE.2019.13

  8. Dreisiebner, S., et al.: Facilitation of Information Literacy Through a Multilingual MOOC Considering Cultural Aspects. Jdoc, ahead-of-print (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0099

  9. Nowrin, S., Robinson, L., Bawden, D.: Multi-Lingual and multi-cultural information literacy: perspectives, models and good practice. Glob. Knowl. Memory Comm. 68(3), 207–222 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gil-Jaurena, I., Callejo-Gallego, J., Agudo, Y.: Evaluation of the UNED MOOCs implementation: demographics, learners’ opinions and completion rates. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distr. Learn. 18, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i7.3155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rawlings, D., Miller-Lewis, L., Collien, D., Tieman, J., Parker, D., Sanderson, C.: Lessons learned from the Dying2Learn MOOC: pedagogy, platforms and partnerships. Edu. Scs. 7(3), 67 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7030067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Young, G., McLaren, L., Maden, M.: Delivering a MOOC for literature searching in health libraries: evaluation of a pilot project. Health Inf. Libr. J. 34(4), 312–318 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rasheed, R.A., Kamsin, A., Abdullah, N.A., Zakari, A., Haruna, K.: A systematic mapping study of the empirical MOOC literature. IEEE Access 7, 124809–124827 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z., et al.: MOOC learner behaviors by country and culture; an exploratory analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Eductional Data Mining, pp. 127–134 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson, L., Bawden, D.: Identifying good practices in information literacy education; creating a multi-lingual, multi-cultural MOOC. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Boustany, J., Špiranec, S., Grassian, E., Mizrachi, D., Roy, L. (eds.) ECIL 2017. CCIS, vol. 810, pp. 715–727. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74334-9_73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Arnes. Izhodišča In Metodologija Izvajanja Množičnih Tečajev (in Slovenian). https://www.arnes.si/files/2018/12/Izhodi%C5%A1%C4%8Da-in-metodologija-izvajanja-mno%C5%BEi%C4%8Dnih-te%C4%8Dajev-SIO2020.pdf

  17. Johansson, S., Frolov, I.: An Adaptable Usability Checklist For Moocs: a Usability Evaluation Instrument for Massive Open Online Courses (2014). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-90330

  18. Nishchyk, A., Sanderson, N.C., Chen, W.: How Elderly People Experience Videos in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, Building Community, Design Education for a Sustainable Future, E, pp. 686–691 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: an Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Los Angeles etc. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Polona Vilar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vilar, P., Žumer, M. (2022). User-Based Evaluation of the Slovenian Version of Information Literacy Online – A Multilingual MOOC for Information Literacy: Methodology and Preliminary Results. In: Kurbanoğlu, S., Špiranec, S., Ünal, Y., Boustany, J., Kos, D. (eds) Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era. ECIL 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1533. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_42

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99884-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99885-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics