Skip to main content

Assessing the Ethical, Social and Environmental Performance of Conferences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2022)

Abstract

There is a rising demand for assessing the performance of organisations on ethical, social and environmental (ESE) topics. Ethical, social and environmental accounting (ESEA) is common practice in many types of organisations and initiatives. Currently, scientific conferences are not in the spotlight nor feeling pressure to disclose their ESE accounts. However, proactively adopting these practices is an opportunity to lead the way and show commitment and responsibility. Since no existing ESEA method fits the domain of conferences well, this paper presents preliminary results on engineering such a method. We discuss material ESE topics for conferences, key performance indicators, measurement and data collection methods, and ICT infrastructure. We illustrate the method concepts by applying it to the RCIS conference series. We are confident that conference organisers and scientific communities will start assessing the performance of their conferences under many organisational sustainability dimensions and, what is more important, initiate reflection processes to improve such performance over the years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://globalreporting.org/standards.

  2. 2.

    https://www.rcis-conf.com.

  3. 3.

    https://esea4rcis.sites.uu.nl.

  4. 4.

    https://www.bcorporation.net, https://www.ecogood.org.

  5. 5.

    https://developer.ieee.org and https://dev.springernature.com.

  6. 6.

    https://namsor.app python SDK (we acknowledge that gender is a social and personal construct, that we have artificially restricted it to a binary classification, and that the only way to determine it accurately is by asking the persons themselves).

References

  1. Arnold, V., Lampe, J.C., Sutton, S.G.: Understanding the factors underlying ethical organizations: Enabling continuous ethical improvement. J. Appl. Bus. Res. 15(3), 1ā€“20 (1999)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. BiĆørn-Hansen, A., Pargman, D., Eriksson, E., Romero, M., Laaksolahti, J., RobĆ©rt, M.: Exploring the problem space of CO2 emission reductions from academic flying. Sustainability 13(21), 12206 (2021)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Cash, P., Å kec, S., Å torga, M.: A bibliometric analysis of the DESIGN 2012 conference. In: ICED 2013. The Design Society (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Coroama, V.C., Hilty, L.M., Birtel, M.: Effects of internet-based multiple-site conferences on greenhouse gas emissions. Telemat. Inform. 29(4) (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  5. EspaƱa, S., Bik, N., Overbeek, S.: Model-driven engineering support for social and environmental accounting. In: RCIS 2019, pp. 1ā€“12. IEEE (2019)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Gao, S.S., Zhang, J.J.: Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Bus. Process Manag. J. (2006)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Gray, R., Owen, D., Maunders, K.: Corporate Social Reporting: Accounting and Accountability. Prentice-Hall (1987)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Hoejmose, S.U., Adrien-Kirby, A.J.: Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: a literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st century. J. Purch. Supply Manag. 18(4), 232ā€“242 (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. Madsen, H., UlhĆøi, J.P.: Integrating environmental and stakeholder management. Special Issue: Netw. Environ. Manag. Sustain. Develop. 10(2), 77ā€“88 (2001)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Mankaa, R.N., Bolz, M., Palumbo, E., Neugebauer, S., Traverso, M.: Walk-the-talk: sustainable events management as common practice for sustainability conferences. In: 12th Italian LCA Network Conference, pp. 11ā€“12 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Mann, S., Bates, O., Maher, R.: Shifting the maturity needle of ICT for sustainability. In: ICT4S 2018, pp. 209ā€“226. EasyChair (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. McCleary-Gaddy, A.: Be explicit: defining the difference between the office of diversity & inclusion and the office of diversity & equity. Med. Teach. 41(12), 1443ā€“1444 (2019)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Neugebauer, S., Bolz, M., Mankaa, R., Traverso, M.: How sustainable are sustainability conferences?-Comprehensive life cycle assessment of an international conference series in Europe. J. Clean. Prod. 242, 118516 (2020)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Pretty, J.N.: Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev. 23(8), 1247ā€“1263 (1995)

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  15. Spinellis, D., Louridas, P.: The carbon footprint of conference papers. PloS One 8(6) (2013)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. Stolowy, H., Paugam, L.: The expansion of non-financial reporting: an exploratory study. Acc. Bus. Res. 48(5), 525ā€“548 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. Stroud, J.T., Feeley, K.J.: Responsible academia: optimizing conference locations to minimize greenhouse gas emissions. Ecography 38(4) (2015)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. Vicente-Saez, R., Martinez-Fuentes, C.: Open science now: a systematic literature review for an integrated definition. J. Bus. Res. 88, 428ā€“436 (2018)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. Voinov, A., Bousquet, F.: Modelling with stakeholders. Environ. Model. Softw. 25(11), 1268ā€“1281 (2010)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S.: Meta-modeling for situational analysis and design methods. In: Handbook of Research on Modern Systems Analysis and Design Technologies and Applications, pp. 35ā€“54. IGI Global (2009)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. Whitehead, J.: Prioritizing sustainability indicators: using materiality analysis to guide sustainability assessment and strategy. Bus. Strat. Env. 26(3), 399ā€“412 (2017)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio EspaƱa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

EspaƱa, S., Ramautar, V., Le, Q.T. (2022). Assessing the Ethical, Social and Environmental Performance of Conferences. In: Guizzardi, R., RalytƩ, J., Franch, X. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05759-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05760-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics