Skip to main content

Human Computer Interaction - Gender in User Experience

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1580))

Abstract

The absence of women in IT has tangible social and technical consequences. Whoever designs the interfaces, defines the functionalities, and writes the algorithms behind them also infuses them with their rational, way of thinking, and modus operandi. If women are typically only users, and not developers, of IT, the female perspective, or more broadly diversity, will be missing from the process of design, creation, and development. This consideration is even more crucial in Human Computer Interaction when looking at the design of usable, useful, and used systems. But how can we measure the impact of neglecting diversity, including diversity of gender, in User Experience (UX)? In this poster, we propose to elaborate on which UX dimensions and factors are contributing to usability to better convey the importance of diversity, as well as addressing whether there is a need to introduce new criteria and measures to account for gender related differences. We expect to deliver an enriched evaluation framework for assessing the performance of technology and the kind of experience it offers to different users while keeping the discussion open in the HCI community and beyond.

This project was partially supported by COST Action CA19122 – European Network for Gender Balance in Informatics (EUGAIN).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The authors used UEQ and VISAWI-S questionnaires, neither of which is geared specifically towards capturing gender issues.

References

  1. Borrett, A.: Why big tech stocks boomed in the pandemic. Tech Monitor (2020). https://techmonitor.ai/techonology/cloud/why-big-tech-stocks-boomed-covid-19

  2. Poletti, T., Owens, J.C.: Opinion: Big tech’s trillion-dollar pandemic year may be just the beginning. Market Watch (2021). https://www.marketwatch.com/story/big-techs-trillion-dollar-pandemic-year-may-be-just-the-beginning-11619813888

  3. European Commission: A comparison of shortage and surplus occupations based on analyses of data from the European Public Employment Services and Labour Force Surveys - Labour shortages and surpluses (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Labour Organization: Skills shortages and labour migration in the field of information and communication technology in India, Indonesia and Thailand. www.ilo.org. Accessed 08 Mar 2022

  5. Eurostat: ICT specialists in employment. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=ICT_specialists_in_employment. Accessed 08 Mar 2022

  6. Joó, M.: Sztereotípiák, bináris oppozíciók, előítéletek – és a Nő. In: Barát, E., Sándor, K. (eds.) A nő és női(es)ség sztereotípiái. “Nyelv, ideológia, Média 2”, pp. 9–22. SZTE Könyvtártudományi Tanszék, Szeged (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Meissner, H.: A nem társadalmi konstrukciója. Megismerési nézőpontok és társadalomelméleti kérdések. In: Juhász, V., Kegyesné Szekeres, E. (eds.) Társadalmi nyelv és nyelvhasználat. Válogatott szemelvények az angol és a német szakirodalomból, pp. 45–73. Szegedi Egyetemi Kiadó, Szeged (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, J.: Gender Trouble. Routledge, Milton Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Crenshaw, K.: Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 1989, Article 8 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  10. West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Doing gender. Gend. Soc. 1(2), 125–151 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. American Dialect Society: 2019 Word of the Year is “(My) Pronouns,” Word of the Decade is Singular “They”. https://www.americandialect.org/2019-word-of-the-year-is-my-pronouns-word-of-the-decade-is-singular-they. Accessed 09 Mar 2022

  12. de Beauvoir, S.: The second sex. Alfred A. Knopf. (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kovács, M. (ed.): Társadalmi nemek. Elméleti megközelítések és kutatási eredmények (Gender: Theoretical approaches and research results). Eötvös kiadó (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sperling, G.B., Winthrop, R.: What Works in Girls’ Education: Evidence for the World's Best Investment. Brooking Institution (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Frehill, L.M., Cohoon, J.M.: Gender and computing. In: Pearson, W., Frehill, L.M., McNeely, C.L. (eds.) Advancing women in science, pp. 237–272. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08629-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mansour, N., Wegerif, R.: Science Education for Diversity: Theory and Practice. Springer, Devon (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4563-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. UNICEF: Girls’education. https://www.unicef.org/education/girls-education. Accessed 09 Mar 2022

  18. Kirkup, G.: ICT as a tool for enhancing women’s education opportunities, and new educational and professional opportunities for women in new technologies. United Nations Division for the Advancement of Women (UNDAW) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. OECD: Women in politics. https://data.oecd.org/inequality/women-in-politics.htm. Accessed 08 Mar 2022

  20. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA): Violence against women: An EU-wide survey. https://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report. Accessed 08 Mar 2022

  21. Szlávi, A.: The Construction of Gender in Hungarian Discourses. Doctoral dissertation. Eötvös Loránd University (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chiam, Z., Duffy, S., Gonzáles Gil, M., Goodwin, L., Mpemba Patel, N.T.: Trans legal mapping report – Recognition before the law 2019. ILGA World. https://ilga.org/trans-legal-mapping-report. Accessed 09 Mar 2022

  23. Crutzen, C.: Questioning gender in e-learning and its relation to computer science. Space for design, working, and learning. In: Braidotti, R., van Baren, A. (eds.) The Making of European Women’s Studies, vol. VI. University of Utrecht, pp. 40–59 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Moustakiss, V.S., Hermann, J.: Where do machine learning and human-computer interaction meet. Appl. Artif. Intell. 11(7), 595–609 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Buolamwini, J., Gebru, T.: Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In: Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 81, pp. 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aufderhaar, K., Schrepp, M., Thomaschewski, J.: Do women and men perceive user experience differently? Int. J. Interact. Multimedia Artif. Intell. 63–67 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Knoll, B., Inhof, C., Posch, P.: Gender Screening – Männer an Maschinen und Frauen im Labormantel [Report (short version): Gender Screening - Men on Machines and Women in Laboratory Coats]. Studie zur Repräsentation von Frauen und Männern in ausgewählten Online- und Printmedien von technischingenieurwissenschaftlichen Universitäten, Fachhochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen in Österreich (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Marsden, N.: Doing UX: Doing gender. User Experience Magazine. https://uxpamagazine.org/doing-ux/. Accessed 09 Mar 2022

  29. Robert, K.: Women on top: inappropriate dropdowns. UX Booth. https://www.uxbooth.com/articles/women-on-top-inappropriate-dropdowns/. Accessed 09 Mar 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Szlávi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Szlávi, A., Landoni, M. (2022). Human Computer Interaction - Gender in User Experience. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06416-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06417-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics