Skip to main content

Chowlk: from UML-Based Ontology Conceptualizations to OWL

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover The Semantic Web (ESWC 2022)

Abstract

Ontology conceptualization is an ontology development task that consists in generating a preliminary model based on the requirements that the ontology should represent. This activity is often carried out by generating the models as diagrams in a blackboard, paper or digital tools. The generated models drive the ontology implementation activity, where the model is formalized and completed using an implementation language. Normally, the ontology conceptualization output serves as guidance for the ontology implementation; however, ontology implementation is usually done from scratch using ontology editors. The goal of this work is to consider ontology conceptualizations as first-order artifacts in ontology development in order to boost the ontology implementation activity. For doing so we present Chowlk, a framework to transform digital machine-processable ontology conceptualization diagrams into OWL. Domain experts and ontologists benefit from this approach in several ways: 1) reduce time generating the first versions of the OWL file that can be invested on 2) focusing on the conceptualization diagrams that can be used both for 3) improving communication between ontology users and developers and 4) be reused during the ontology documentation stage.

This work has been supported by the BIMERR funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 820621.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://chowlk.linkeddata.es/notation.html.

  2. 2.

    http://bimerr.iot.linkeddata.es/def/building#.

  3. 3.

    https://chowlk.linkeddata.es.

  4. 4.

    https://chowlk.linkeddata.es/api.

  5. 5.

    https://github.com/oeg-upm/Chowlk.

  6. 6.

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4312930.

  7. 7.

    https://zenodo.org/record/4312930#.X9yNt9hKiUk.

  8. 8.

    https://bimerr.iot.linkeddata.es/.

  9. 9.

    https://cogito.iot.linkeddata.es/.

  10. 10.

    https://digitalconstruction.github.io/v/0.5/index.html.

  11. 11.

    https://coswot.gitlab.io/.

  12. 12.

    http://www.elzeard.co/ontologies/c3po/plant#.

  13. 13.

    https://github.com/mnavasloro/ft3/blob/04c65c2b2ed2bd57f9ac6cfb32b7f4ebfda1f4c4/ft3.owl.

  14. 14.

    https://krnlet.github.io/#.

  15. 15.

    https://github.com/Mat-O-Lab/MSEO.

  16. 16.

    https://www.w3.org/.

  17. 17.

    https://github.com/w3c/wot-discovery/blob/24b2141e8e0cb74abd24cead0b4bbffb672e24c6/context/discovery-ontology.ttl.

  18. 18.

    https://gitlab.com/kupferdigital/ontoflow.

  19. 19.

    https://github.com/oeg-upm/Chowlk/tree/webservice/tests/inputs.

  20. 20.

    https://essepuntato.it/graffoo/.

  21. 21.

    https://essepuntato.it/ditto/.

References

  1. Alobaid, A., Garijo, D., Poveda-Villalón, M., Santana-Perez, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, A., Corcho, O.: Automating ontology engineering support activities with OnToology. J. Web Semant. 57, 100472 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barzdins, A., Barzdins, G., Cerans, K., Liepins, R., Sprogis, A.: UML style graphical notation and editor for OWL 2. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds.) BIR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 64, pp. 102–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Corcho, O., et al.: A high-level ontology network for ICT infrastructures. In: Hotho, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12922, pp. 446–462. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Dean, M., et al.: Owl web ontology language reference. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  5. Dudás, M., Lohmann, S., Svátek, V., Pavlov, D.: Ontology visualization methods and tools: a survey of the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 33 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Garijo, D., Poveda-Villalón, M.: Best Practices for Implementing FAIR Vocabularies and Ontologies on the Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW200034

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Haase, P., Brockmans, S., Palma, R., Euzenat, J., d’Aquin, M.: D1.1.2 updated version of the networked ontology model. Technical report, Universität Karlsruhe (2009). NeOn Project. http://neon-project.org/

  8. Hayes, P., Eskridge, T., Saavedra, R., Reichherzer, T., Mehrotra, M., Bobrovnikoff, D.: Collaborative knowledge capture in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Krivov, S., Williams, R., Villa, F.: Ontotrack: a semantic approach for ontology authoring. A tool for visualization and editing of OWL ontologies, GrOWL (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liebig, T., Noppens, O.: Ontotrack: a semantic approach for ontology authoring. Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Web Semantics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Musen, M.A.: The protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1(4), 4–12 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Novak, J., Cañas, A.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical report (2006). Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Poveda-Villalón, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: Oops! (ontology pitfall scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 10(2), 7–34 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ruckhaus, E., Anton-Bravo, A., Scrocca, M., Corcho, O.: Applying the lot methodology to a public bus transport ontology aligned with transmodel: challenges and results (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-210451. https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw210451

  15. Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B.: Using triples for implementation: the triple20 ontology-manipulation tool. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 773–785. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiens, V., Lohmann, S., Auer, S.: Webvowl editor: device-independent visual ontology modeling. In: International Semantic Web Conference (2018)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Serge Chávez-Feria .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chávez-Feria, S., García-Castro, R., Poveda-Villalón, M. (2022). Chowlk: from UML-Based Ontology Conceptualizations to OWL. In: Groth, P., et al. The Semantic Web. ESWC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06981-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06981-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06980-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06981-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics