Abstract
Ontology conceptualization is an ontology development task that consists in generating a preliminary model based on the requirements that the ontology should represent. This activity is often carried out by generating the models as diagrams in a blackboard, paper or digital tools. The generated models drive the ontology implementation activity, where the model is formalized and completed using an implementation language. Normally, the ontology conceptualization output serves as guidance for the ontology implementation; however, ontology implementation is usually done from scratch using ontology editors. The goal of this work is to consider ontology conceptualizations as first-order artifacts in ontology development in order to boost the ontology implementation activity. For doing so we present Chowlk, a framework to transform digital machine-processable ontology conceptualization diagrams into OWL. Domain experts and ontologists benefit from this approach in several ways: 1) reduce time generating the first versions of the OWL file that can be invested on 2) focusing on the conceptualization diagrams that can be used both for 3) improving communication between ontology users and developers and 4) be reused during the ontology documentation stage.
This work has been supported by the BIMERR funded from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 820621.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
References
Alobaid, A., Garijo, D., Poveda-Villalón, M., Santana-Perez, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, A., Corcho, O.: Automating ontology engineering support activities with OnToology. J. Web Semant. 57, 100472 (2018)
Barzdins, A., Barzdins, G., Cerans, K., Liepins, R., Sprogis, A.: UML style graphical notation and editor for OWL 2. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds.) BIR 2010. LNBIP, vol. 64, pp. 102–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_9
Corcho, O., et al.: A high-level ontology network for ICT infrastructures. In: Hotho, A., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12922, pp. 446–462. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88361-4_26
Dean, M., et al.: Owl web ontology language reference. W3C Recommendation, World Wide Web Consortium (2004). http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
Dudás, M., Lohmann, S., Svátek, V., Pavlov, D.: Ontology visualization methods and tools: a survey of the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 33 (2018)
Garijo, D., Poveda-Villalón, M.: Best Practices for Implementing FAIR Vocabularies and Ontologies on the Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2020). https://doi.org/10.3233/SSW200034
Haase, P., Brockmans, S., Palma, R., Euzenat, J., d’Aquin, M.: D1.1.2 updated version of the networked ontology model. Technical report, Universität Karlsruhe (2009). NeOn Project. http://neon-project.org/
Hayes, P., Eskridge, T., Saavedra, R., Reichherzer, T., Mehrotra, M., Bobrovnikoff, D.: Collaborative knowledge capture in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Capture (2005)
Krivov, S., Williams, R., Villa, F.: Ontotrack: a semantic approach for ontology authoring. A tool for visualization and editing of OWL ontologies, GrOWL (2007)
Liebig, T., Noppens, O.: Ontotrack: a semantic approach for ontology authoring. Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Web Semantics (2005)
Musen, M.A.: The protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1(4), 4–12 (2015)
Novak, J., Cañas, A.: The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical report (2006). Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006–01, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition (IHMC)
Poveda-Villalón, M., Gómez-Pérez, A., Suárez-Figueroa, M.C.: Oops! (ontology pitfall scanner!): an on-line tool for ontology evaluation. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 10(2), 7–34 (2014)
Ruckhaus, E., Anton-Bravo, A., Scrocca, M., Corcho, O.: Applying the lot methodology to a public bus transport ontology aligned with transmodel: challenges and results (2021). https://doi.org/10.3233/SW-210451. https://content.iospress.com/articles/semantic-web/sw210451
Wielemaker, J., Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B.: Using triples for implementation: the triple20 ontology-manipulation tool. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 773–785. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11574620_55
Wiens, V., Lohmann, S., Auer, S.: Webvowl editor: device-independent visual ontology modeling. In: International Semantic Web Conference (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chávez-Feria, S., García-Castro, R., Poveda-Villalón, M. (2022). Chowlk: from UML-Based Ontology Conceptualizations to OWL. In: Groth, P., et al. The Semantic Web. ESWC 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13261. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06981-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06981-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06980-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06981-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)