Skip to main content

Multi-model Monitoring Framework for Hybrid Process Specifications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE 2022)

Abstract

So far, business process monitoring approaches have mainly focused on monitoring executions with respect to a single process model. This setting aptly captures monolithic scenarios from domains in which all possible behaviors can be folded into a single model. However, this strategy cannot be applied to domains where multiple interacting (procedural) sub-processes work under additional (declarative) constraints. For example, in healthcare, co-morbid patients may be subject to multiple clinical pathways at once, in the presence of additional, general constraints capturing basic medical knowledge. To support monitoring of thus emerging hybrid specifications, we propose a Multi-Model Monitoring Framework. On the one hand, the framework allows for a hybrid representation of a process, using both procedural and declarative models. This admits more flexible process model design as domain experts can focus on specific procedures and domain constraints without needing to merge them into one single specification. On the other hand, the framework includes an automata-based monitoring technique to simultaneously account for multiple models within one execution while resolving conflicts caused by the interplay of such models. We describe the overall framework, report on a prototypical implementation of the monitoring technique, and demonstrate its feasibility with a healthcare scenario.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Classifiers available at: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications.

  2. 2.

    For example: https://reference.medscape.com/drug-interactionchecker.

References

  1. Alman, A., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Patrizi, F., Rivkin, A.: Monitoring hybrid process specifications with conflict management: The automata-theoretic approach. Technical report, arXiv.org (2021)

  2. Andaloussi, A.A., Burattin, A., Slaats, T., Kindler, E., Weber, B.: On the declarative paradigm in hybrid business process representations: a conceptual framework and a systematic literature study. Inf. Syst. 91, 101505 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bergami, G., Maggi, F.M., Marrella, A., Montali, M.: Aligning data-aware declarative process models and event logs. In: BPM, pp. 235–251 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bottrighi, A., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Montani, S., Terenziani, P.: Conformance checking of executed clinical guidelines in presence of basic medical knowledge. In: BPM Workshops, pp. 200–211 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burattin, A., Maggi, F.M., Sperduti, A.: Conformance checking based on multi-perspective declarative process models. Expert Syst. Appl. 65, 194–211 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. De Masellis, R., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M.: Monitoring data-aware business constraints with finite state automata. In: ICSSP, pp. 134–143. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. De Smedt, J., De Weerdt, J., Vanthienen, J.: Fusion miner: process discovery for mixed-paradigm models. Decis. Support Syst. 77, 123–136 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dongen, B.F., De Smedt, J., Di Ciccio, C., Mendling, J.: Conformance checking of mixed-paradigm process models. Inf. Syst. 102, 101685 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation, 3rd Edition. Addison-Wesley (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jalali, A., Maggi, F.M., Reijers, H.A.: A hybrid approach for aspect-oriented business process modeling. J. Softw. Evol. Process. 30(8), e1931 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Leoni, M., Felli, P., Montali, M.: A holistic approach for soundness verification of decision-aware process models. In: Trujillo, J.C., et al. (eds.) ER 2018. LNCS, vol. 11157, pp. 219–235. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_17

  12. Ly, L.T., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Compliance monitoring in business processes: functionalities, application, and tool-support. Inf. Syst. 54, 209–234 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Bhat, U.: Compliance monitoring of multi-perspective declarative process models. In: EDOC, pp. 151–160. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Westergaard, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring business constraints with linear temporal logic: an approach based on colored automata. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Maggi, F.M., Slaats, T., Reijers, H.A.: The automated discovery of hybrid processes. In: Sadiq, S., Soffer, P., Völzer, H. (eds.) BPM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8659, pp. 392–399. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10172-9_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mannhardt, F., de Leoni, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Balanced multi-perspective checking of process conformance. Computing 98(4), 407–437 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-015-0441-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Montali, M., Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative specification and verification of service choreographiess. ACM Trans. Web 4(1), 3:1–3:62 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pla, A., Gay, P., Meléndez, J., López, B.: Petri net-based process monitoring: a workflow management system for process modelling and monitoring. J. Intell. Manuf. 25(3), 539–554 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-012-0704-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prock, J.: A new technique for fault detection using petri nets. Automatica 27(2), 239–245 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E., Sadiq, W.: Specification and validation of process constraints for flexible workflows. Inf. Syst. 30(5), 349–378 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Slaats, T.: Declarative and hybrid process discovery: recent advances and open challenges. J. Data Semant. 9(1), 3–20 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Spiotta, M., Terenziani, P., Theseider Dupré, D.: Temporal conformance analysis and explanation of clinical guidelines execution: an answer set programming approach. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 29(11), 2567–2580 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of A. Alman was supported by the European Social Fund via “ICT programme” measure and by the Estonian Research Council grant PRG1226. F.M. Maggi was supported by the UNIBZ project CAT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anti Alman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alman, A., Maggi, F.M., Montali, M., Patrizi, F., Rivkin, A. (2022). Multi-model Monitoring Framework for Hybrid Process Specifications. In: Franch, X., Poels, G., Gailly, F., Snoeck, M. (eds) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. CAiSE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13295. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07472-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07471-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07472-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics