Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conflict in Tiny Town: Aggregate Mining at the Alliston Aquifer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Group Decision and Negotiation: Methodological and Practical Issues (GDN 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 454))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Conflict over an application to expand aggregate mining in the Township of Tiny, Ontario, is investigated using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. This analysis sheds light on a consequential and growing class of multi-jurisdictional resources conflict in Ontario, aggregate mining. At the same time, because the Alliston aquifer contains the purest known naturally occurring water globally, this work describes an aggregate dispute in a unique setting. Analysis indicates that the evaluation process provides more opportunities to approve the application to expand mining at the site. However, some residents opposing the site are seeking novel ways to intervene in the process, such as appealing for federal intervention based on the unique status of the aquifer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mittelstaedt, M.: The battle over the world’s purest water. The globe and mail. 4 May 2009 (2009). https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/the-battle-over-the-worlds-purest-water/article4193063/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022.

  2. Mendler, A.: Newsmakers of the year: the pristine water of tiny township. Simcoe.com. 27 Dec 2018 (2018). https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/9083810-newsmakers-of-the-year-the-pristine-water-of-tiny-township/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  3. Mendler, A.: ‘We have to protect this’: tiny township ‘waterkeepers’ taking gravel pit concerns to Ontario legislature. The Star. 14 Mar 2022 (2022). https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/10586704--we-have-to-protect-this-tiny-township-waterkeepers-taking-gravel-pit-concerns-to-ontario-legislature/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  4. Mendler, A.: ‘It’s important to all Canadians’: Petition calls on federal government to protect Tiny Township aquifer. The Mirror. 19 Mar 2022 (2022). https://www.thestar.com/local-midland/news/2022/03/19/it-s-important-to-all-canadians-petition-calls-on-federal-government-to-protect-tiny-township-aquifer.html. Accessed 30 Mar 2022

  5. Cecco, L.: The Canadian town of Tiny has the world’s purest water. A gravel mining operation could ruin it. The Guardian, Nov 2021 (2021). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/nov/25/tiny-town-purest-water-georgian-bay-ontario-gravel-mining.25. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  6. Ioanna, R., Witmer, B.: Residents fear effects of increasing quarry activity on Elmvale groundwater, believed to be cleanest in world. CBC News. 27 Nov 2021 (2021). https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/elmvale-ground-water-quarry-1.6199158. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  7. Marc Kilgour, D., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L.: The graph model for conflicts. Automatica 23(1), 41–55 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(87)90117-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, Hoboken (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Xu, H., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L.: Conflict Resolution Using the Graph Model: Strategic Interactions in Competition and Cooperation. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77670-5

  10. Hipel, K.W., Fang, L., Kilgour, D.M.: The graph model for conflict resolution: reflections on three decades of development. Group Decis. Negot. 29(1), 11–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-019-09648-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hipel, K.W., Fang, L.: The graph model for conflict resolution and decision support. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 51(1), 131–141 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2020.3041462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aggregate Resources Act.: 2019. Pub. L. No. R.S.O. 1990, Chapter A.8 (2019). https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90a08. Accessed 25 Feb 2021

  13. Drew, L.J., Langer, W.H., Sachs, J.S.: Environmentalism and natural aggregate mining. Nat. Resour. Res. 11(1), 19–28 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014283519471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandberg, L.A.: Leave the sand in the land, let the stone alone: pits, quarries and climate change. ACME Int. J. Crit. Geog. 12(1), 65–87 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner, E.V.: Law’s rurality: land use law and the shaping of people–place relations in rural Ontario. J. Rural. Stud. 47, 311–325 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrur-stud.2016.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wagner, E.V.: The work of ownership: shaping contestation in ontario’s aggregate extraction disputes. In: Bruun, M.H., Cockburn, J.L., Risager, B.S., Thorup, M. (eds.) Contested property claims. What disagreement tells us about ownership, Chapter 7. Taylor and Francis. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Constitution Act. 1867.: (UK), 30 & 31 Vict, c 3, reprinted in RSC 1985, App II, No 5. Accessed 25 Feb 2021. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/30%13-31-vict-c-3/97547/30%13-31-vict-c-3.html

  18. Provincial policy statement 2020.: Approved by the lieutenant governor in council, Order in council no. 229/2020 (2020). https://files.ontario.ca/mmah-provincial-policy-statement-2020-accessible-final-en-2020-02-14.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2021

  19. Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990 (2021). https://www.ontario.ca/laws/statute/90p13#BK8. Accessed 16 Mar 2022

  20. Statistics Canada 2017.: Tiny, TP [Census subdivision], Ontario and Saskatchewan [Province] (table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. Released 29 Nov 2017. https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E. Accessed 31 Mar 2022

  21. Township of Tiny. (n.d.).: Living in Tiny. Retrieved 28 Mar 2022. https://www.tiny.ca/township-hall/about-tiny. Township of Tiny 2020. https://www.tiny.ca/Shared%20Documents/Teedon%20Pit%20Expansion%20Aggregate%20Resources%20Act%20Application/Township%20Letter.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2022

  22. Shahid, M.: ‘David and Goliath’ clash looming over Tiny’s Teedon Pit extension. OrilliaMatters.com. 23 Jan 2021 (2021). https://www.midlandtoday.ca/local-news/david-and-goliath-clash-looming-over-tinys-teedon-pit-extension-3285324. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  23. Shotyk, W., Krachler, M., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Hillier, S., Zheng, J.: Trace elements in recent groundwater of an artesian flow system and comparison with snow: enrichments, depletions, and chemical evolution of the water. J. Environ. Monit. 12, 208–217 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Howard, D.: Tiny exploring whether it’s taxing aggregate companies ‘correctly’. Midland Today. 13 Jan 2022 (2022). https://www.midlandtoday.ca/local-news/tiny-exploring-whether-its-taxing-aggregate-companies-correctly-4951430. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  25. Mendler, A.: Expanded tiny township gravel pit to impact environment minimally: company. Simcoe.com. 6 Mar 2019 (2019). https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/9208653-expanded-tiny-township-gravel-pit-to-impact-environment-minimally-company/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  26. Bacher, J.: Alliston aquifer threatened again by gravel washing. Sierra Club Foundation. 20 Jan 2021 (2021). https://www.sierraclub.ca/en/ontario-chapter/2021-01-20/alliston-aquifer-threatened-again-gravel-washing

  27. MHBC (MacNaughton, Hermson Britton Clarkson Planning Limited).: Aggregate Resources Act Summary Statement. January 2019 (2019). https://www.tiny.ca/Shared%20Documents/Teedon%20Pit%20Expansion%20Aggregate%20Resources%20Act%20Application/Aggregate%20Resources%20Act%20Summary%20Statement-Teedon%20Pit%20Extension-09Jan2019.pdf. Accessed 30 Mar 2022

  28. Government of Ontario.: Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO) (2021). https://ero.ontario.ca/

  29. Esemag.com.: Tiny Township groups stay in fight to protect pure water against gravel mining. 6 Dec 2021 (2021). https://esemag.com/water/tiny-township-fight-protect-water-against-gravel-mining/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  30. Harries, K.: Purest water: Tiny council votes 3–2 to settle with aggregate company. Aware Simcoe. 22 Jun 2021 (2021). https://aware-simcoe.ca/2021/06/purest-water-tiny-council-votes-3-2-to-settle-with-aggregate-company/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  31. Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., Peng, X.: The decision support system GMCR II in negotiations over groundwater contamination. In: Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 942–948. IEEE, Tokyo (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Fang, L., Peng, X.: Applying the decision support system GMCR II to negotiation over water. In: Negotiation over water, ed. U. Shamir, 50–70. The International Hydrological Programme, Technical Document in Hydrology No. 53. Paris: United Nations Educational, Science and Cultural Organization (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Akbari, A., Mirnasl, N., Hipel, K.W.: Will peaceful waters flow again? A game-theoretic insight into a tripartite environmental conflict in the Middle East. Environ. Manage. 67(4), 667–681 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01429-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Madani, K., Hipel, K.W.: Non-cooperative stability definitions for strategic analysis of generic water resources conflicts. Water Resour. Manage 25(8), 1949–1977 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9783-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chu, Y., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L., Wang, H.: Systems methodology for resolving water conflicts: the Zhanghe river water conflict in China. Int. J. Water Resour. Dev. 31(1), 106–119 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2014.933096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Philpot, S.L., Hipel, K.W., Johnson, P.A.: Strategic analysis of a water rights conflict in the south-western United States. J. Environ. Manage. 180, 247–256 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Garcia, A., Hipel, K.W., Obeidi. A.: Water pricing conflict in British Columbia. Hydrol. Res. Lett. 11(4), 194–200 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.11.194

  38. Noakes, D.J., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: An examination of the salmon aquaculture conflict in British Columbia using the graph model for conflict resolution. Fish. Manage. Ecol. 10(3), 123–137 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00336.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Noakes, D.J., Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: The pacific salmon treaty: a century of debate and an uncertain future. Group Decis. Negot. 14(6), 501–522 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-9005-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu, K., Hipel, K.W., Fang, L.: A conflict model for the international hazardous waste disposal dispute. J. Hazard. Mater. 172(1), 138–146 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bernath Walker, S., Boutilier, T., Hipel, K.W.: Systems management study of a private brownfield renovation. J. Urban Plann. Dev. 136(3), 249–260 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:3(249)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hipel, K.W., Hegazy, T., Yousefi, S.: Combined strategic and tactical negotiation methodology for resolving complex brownfield conflicts. Pesquisa Operacional 30(2), 281–304 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-74382010000200003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Yousefi, S., Hipel, K.W., Hegazy, T.: Considering attitudes in strategic negotiation over brownfield disputes. J. Leg. Aff. Disput. Resolut. Eng. Constr. 2(4), 240–310 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)LA.1943-4170.0000034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yousefi, S., Hipel, K.W., Hegazy, T.: Optimum compromise among environmental dispute issues using attitude-based negotiation. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 38(2), 184–190 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1139/L10-125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hipel, K.W., Walker, S.B.: Brownfield redevelopment. In: Craig, R. (ed.) Ecosystem management and sustainability, pp. 44–48. Barrington (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Philpot, S.L., Johnson, P.A., Hipel, K.W.: Analysis of a brownfield management conflict in Canada. Hydrol. Res. Lett. 11(3), 141–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3178/hrl.11.141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xiao, Y.K., Hipel, K.W., Fang. L.: Strategic investigation of the Jackpine mine expansion dispute in the Alberta oil sands. Int. J. Decis. Support Syst. Technol. 71(1), 50–62 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Garcia, A., Obeidi, A., Hipel, K.W.: Two methodological perspectives on the energy East Pipeline conflict. Energy Policy 91, 397–409 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Peng, X.: A decision support system for interactive decision making—Part I: model formulation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 33(1), 42–55. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2003.809361

  50. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Peng, X.: A decision support system for interactive decision making—Part II: analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 33(1), 56–66. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmcc.2003.809360

  51. Nash, J.: Equilibrium points in n-person games. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A, vol. 36, pp. 48–49 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Nash, J.: Noncooperative games. Ann. Math. 54(2), 286–295 (1951). https://doi.org/10.2307/1969529

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Howard, N.: Paradoxes of Rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fraser, N., Hipel, K.W.: Conflict Analysis Models and Resolutions. Elsevier Science, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  55. Kinsara, R.A., Petersons, O., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: Advanced decision support for the graph model for conflict resolution. J. Decis. Syst. 24(2), 117–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2015.1046682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Township of Tiny.: Confidential Report. Motion # 249. Meeting Date: 21 May 2021 (2021). https://www.tiny.ca/Shared%20Documents/Teedon%20Pit%20Expansion%20Aggregate%20Resources%20Act%20Application/Council%20Motion%20249%20and%20Staff%20Report%20%20PD-027-21.pdf. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  57. Mendler, A.: Tiny Township ‘fundamentally opposed’ to aggregate extraction in ‘environmentally sensitive areas’ Simcoe.com. 4 Feb 2020 (2020). https://www.simcoe.com/news-story/9839678-tiny-township-fundamentally-opposed-to-aggregate-extraction-in-environmentally-sensitive-areas-/. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  58. Philips, A.: Petition seeks federal help to protect ‘purest water in the world’. OrilliaMatters.com 3 Mar 2022 (2022). https://www.midlandtoday.ca/local-news/petition-seeks-federal-help-to-protect-regions-purest-water-in-the-world-5122301. Accessed 04 Apr 2022

  59. CWA. 1985. Canada Water Act, RSC 1985, c C-11. https://canlii.ca/t/527q3. Retrieved on 05 Apr 2022. Accessed 03 Apr 2022

  60. Pralle, S.B.: Venue shopping, political strategy, and policy change: the internationalization of Canadian forest advocacy. J. Publ. Policy 23(3), 233–260 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Philpot, S., Hipel, K.W.: Investigating an aggregate mine proposal using the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 1–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2021.1994850

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Simone Philpot, Nayyer Mirnasl & Keith W. Hipel

  2. Centre for International Governance Innovation, and Balsillie School of International Affairs, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada

    Keith W. Hipel

Authors
  1. Simone Philpot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nayyer Mirnasl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keith W. Hipel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Philpot .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil

    Danielle Costa Morais

  2. Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Liping Fang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Philpot, S., Mirnasl, N., Hipel, K.W. (2022). Conflict in Tiny Town: Aggregate Mining at the Alliston Aquifer. In: Morais, D.C., Fang, L. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation: Methodological and Practical Issues. GDN 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 454. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07996-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07996-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07995-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07996-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation