Abstract
Older people would like to live independently for as long as possible. However, seniors may experience cognitive and physical problems which could have a great impact on their autonomy and their quality of life. Over the last years, several national and European projects were founded to design, develop, and test reliable solutions to support the life of the older population. In this context, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), such as robots, could represent a valid solution to empower older people. Inspired by the current trends, this paper presents the design and the development of a telepresence and monitoring service to foster active aging. The proposed approach is based on a human-centered design which leads to the definitions of the services through the focus groups and the survey conducted within social cooperatives. Based on these results, a cloud system composed of environmental sensors and a telepresence robot was developed and tested in private homes and residential facilities without the presence of any external support. The results underline a positive attitude of the senior citizens such as the caregivers involved in the services. The telepresence robot demonstrates high reliability and it was used for more than 100 calls during the experimentation phase. During this experience, we collected and grouped multidisciplinary guidelines and feedbacks which we report in this paper as guidelines for future researchers.
A. Sorrentino and L. Radi---Equal contribution to the work.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
CASAS: Center of Advanced Studies in Adaptive System – Official webpage: http://casas.wsu.edu/ (Accessed on June 2021).
References
ARS Toscana Agenzia regionale di sanità: ARS Toscana Agenzia regionale di sanità. https://www.ars.toscana.it/aree-dintervento/la-salute-di/anziani.html. Accessed on June 2021
Ada-Helen, B., Harper, L.: Fixing To Stay: a National Survey of Housing Issues and Home Modification. AARP Knowledge Management, Washington, DC (2000)
Kalache, A., Gatti, A.: Active ageing: a policy framework. Adv. Gerontol. 11, 7–18 (2003)
Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C., Gemperle, F.: Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_3
Rubenstein, L.Z.: Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. In: Age and Ageing (2006). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afl084
Hurley, A.C., et al.: Promoting safer home environments for persons with Alzheimer’s disease. The home safety/injury model. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 30, 43–51 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3928/0098-9134-20040601-09
Rowe, M.A., Fehrenbach, N.: Injuries sustained by community-dwelling individuals with dementia. Clin. Nurs. Res. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773803262520
Adams, R.G., Blieszner, R.: Aging well with friends and family. Am. Behav. Sci. (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764295039002008
Twersky, J.I.: Falls in the nursing home. Clin. Fam. Pract. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1522-5720(05)70119-7
Rowe, M.A., Glover, J.C.: Antecedents, descriptions and consequences of wandering in cognitively-impaired adults and the Safe Return (SR) program. Am. J. Alzheimers. Dis. Other Demen. (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750101600610
Rowe, M.A., Bennett, V.: A look at deaths occurring in persons with dementia lost in the community. Am. J. Alzheimers. Dis. Other Demen. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750301800612
Baraković, S., et al.: Quality of life framework for personalised ageing: a systematic review of ICT solutions (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082940
Guizzo, E.: Robots with their heads in the clouds (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSPEC.2011.5719709
ISO: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Ergonomics of human system interaction Part 210 (ISO 9241-210). Iso 9241210, vol. 40, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0dt90114h
International Ergonomics Association and others: International Ergonomics Association-What is ergonomics, 07-04. Accessed on 2015
Wilson, J.R., Corlett, E.N.: Evaluation of human work: a practical ergonomics methodology. Appl. Ergon. 22 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(91)90014-9
Gyi, D., Shalloe, S., Wilson, J.R.: Participatory ergonomics. Eval. Hum. Work 4, 883–906 (2015)
Caplan, S.: Using focus group methodology for ergonomic design. Ergonomics 33 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139008927160
Krueger, R. A., Casey, M.A.: Planning the focus group study. In: Focus Groups A Practical Guide for Applied Research (2015)
Wilson, J.R., Sharples, S.: Evaluation of human work (4th edition). In: Methods in the understanding of Human Factors (2015)
Gil, N.M., et al.: Data visualisation and data mining technology for supporting care for older people. In: ASSETS’07: Proceedings of the Ninth International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1296843.1296868
Nielsen, J.: 10 Usability Heuristics for User Interface Design, (1995). https://doi.org/10.1145/191666.191729
Henderson, A.: Interaction design: beyond human-computer interaction. Ubiquity. (2002). https://doi.org/10.1145/512526.512528
Oberstein, T., Goedde, A.: The Web Application Messaging Protocol (2015)
Fiorini, L., Cavallo, F., Dario, P., Eavis, A., Caleb-Solly, P.: Unsupervised machine learning for developing personalised behaviour models using activity data. Sensors. 17, 1034 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/s17051034
Dawadi, P.N., Cook, D.J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.: Automated cognitive health assessment using smart home monitoring of complex tasks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Syst. 43, 1302–1313 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMC.2013.2252338
Cook, D.J., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Jonsson, L.: Technology-enabled assessment of functional health. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2018.2851500
Esposito, R., et al.: Engagement during Interaction with Assistive Robots, vol. 8, pp. 739–744 (2018)
Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., Tiberio, L.: Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: methodology and ecological case study. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8(3), 421–441 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-016-0337-z
Fiorini, L., et al.: Multidimensional evaluation of telepresence robot: result from a fiel trial. In: IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 1211–1216 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sorrentino, A. et al. (2022). Design and Development of a Telepresence and Monitoring Service to Empower the Older Adults. In: Bettelli, A., Monteriù, A., Gamberini, L. (eds) Ambient Assisted Living. ForItAAL 2020. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 884. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08838-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08838-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08837-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08838-4
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)