Skip to main content

Discourse Component Recognition via Graph Neural Network in Chinese Student Argumentative Essays

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13368))

  • 1603 Accesses

Abstract

Identifying and classifying original discourse components is a prerequisite task for constructing the knowledge graph structure. Previous work suffers from the following problems. (i) Existing methods only rely on the discourse components themselves to extract the features of the text, and do not fully take into account the potential help of the context information of the discourse to consummate its own features. (ii) Most of the current methods usually combine multiple tasks for joint inference, with complementary effects among them, lacking methods focusing on the single-target task of discourse component recognition. To address these issues, we propose a graph neural network-based discourse component recognition model (DCRGNN), which enhances the interaction of sentence-level discourse component features through graph structure. Our experimental results show that DCRGNN achieves a relative improvement of up to 6% on Macro-F1 for specific discourse component types compared to the previous state-of-the-art methods on the Chinese dataset, and exceeds the baseline model in the single-target task on the English dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://ai.tencent.com/ailab/nlp/en/embedding.html.

References

  1. Afantenos, S., Peldszus, A., Stede, M.: Comparing decoding mechanisms for parsing argumentative structures. Argument Comput. 9(3), 177–192 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bao, J., Fan, C., Wu, J., Dang, Y., Du, J., Xu, R.: A neural transition-based model for argumentation mining. In: Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 6354–6364 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chakrabarty, T., Hidey, C., Muresan, S., McKeown, K., Hwang, A.: Ampersand: Argument mining for persuasive online discussions (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daxenberger, J., Eger, S., Habernal, I., Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: What is the essence of a claim? cross-domain claim identification, pp. 2055–2066 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eger, S., Daxenberger, J., Gurevych, I.: Neural end-to-end learning for computational argumentation mining, pp. 11–22 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gehring, J., Auli, M., Grangier, D., Dauphin, Y.N.: A convolutional encoder model for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.02344 (2016)

  7. Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., Leskovec, J.: Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hasanzadeh, A., et al.: Bayesian graph neural networks with adaptive connection sampling. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 4094–4104. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., Sun, J.: Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 37(9), 1904–1916 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lawrence, J., Reed, C.: Argument mining: a survey. Comput. Linguist. 45(4), 765–818 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Levy, R., Bilu, Y., Hershcovich, D., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Context dependent claim detection. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 1489–1500 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niculae, V., Park, J., Cardie, C.: Argument mining with structured SVMs and RNNs (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Persing, I., Ng, V.: End-to-end argumentation mining in student essays. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 1384–1394 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Potash, P., Romanov, A., Rumshisky, A.: Here’s my point: Joint pointer architecture for argument mining, pp. 1364–1373 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rinott, R., Dankin, L., Alzate, C., Khapra, M.M., Aharoni, E., Slonim, N.: Show me your evidence-an automatic method for context dependent evidence detection. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pp. 440–450 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Song, W., Song, Z., Fu, R., Liu, L., Cheng, M., Liu, T.: Discourse self-attention for discourse element identification in argumentative student essays. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 2820–2830 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Song, Y., Heilman, M., Klebanov, B.B., Deane, P.: Applying argumentation schemes for essay scoring. In: Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, pp. 69–78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Identifying argumentative discourse structures in persuasive essays. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 46–56 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stab, C., Gurevych, I.: Parsing argumentation structures in persuasive essays. Comput. Linguist. 43(3), 619–659 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun, D., Huang, Z., Li, D., Ye, X., Wang, Y.: Improved partitioning graph embedding framework for small cluster. In: Qiu, H., Zhang, C., Fei, Z., Qiu, M., Kung, S.-Y. (eds.) KSEM 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12815, pp. 203–215. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82136-4_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, H., Huang, Z., Dou, Y., Hong, Y.: Argumentation mining on essays at multi scales. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 5480–5493 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Key R &D Program of China under Grants (No. 2018YFB0204300).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhen Huang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, S., Zhang, Z., Dou, Y., Luo, J., Huang, Z. (2022). Discourse Component Recognition via Graph Neural Network in Chinese Student Argumentative Essays. In: Memmi, G., Yang, B., Kong, L., Zhang, T., Qiu, M. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13368. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10983-6_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10983-6_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10982-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10983-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics