Abstract
Recent years have seen a surge in research conducted on intelligent online learning platforms, with a particular expansion of research conducting A/B testing to decide which design to use, and research using secondary platform data in analyses. This scientometric study aims to investigate how scholarship builds on these two different types of research. We collected papers for both categories - A/B testing, and educational data mining (EDM) on log data- in the context of the same learning platform. We then collected a randomized stratified sample of papers citing those A/B and EDM papers, and coded the reason for each citation. On comparing the frequency of citation categories between the two types of papers, we found that A/B test papers were cited more often to provide background and context for a study, whereas the EDM papers were cited to use past specific core ideas, theories, and findings in the field. This paper establishes a method to compare the contribution of different types of research on AIED systems such as interactive learning platforms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The open released data sets are publicly available at https://www.etrialstestbed.org/resources/featured-studies/dataset-papers.
- 2.
The data set created is publicly available at https://osf.io/rmswe/?view_only=d496417aef1e4046907d2271b8a86cbb.
References
Baker, R.S., Yacef, K.: The state of educational data mining in 2009: a review and future visions. J. Educ. Data Mining 1(1), 3–17 (2009)
Beck, J.E., Arroyo, I., Woolf, B.P., Beal, C.” An ablative evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 611–613 (1999)
Bornmann, L., Daniel, H.: What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. J Document. 64, 45–80 (2009)
Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., Courtial, J., Laville, F.: Historical scientometrics? Mapping over 70 years of biological safety research with coword analysis. Scientometrics 27(2), 119–143 (1993)
Chen, G., Rolim, V., Mello, R.F., Gašević, G.: Let's shine together! a comparative study between learning analytics and educational data mining. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 544–553 (2020)
Cole, J.R., Cole, S.: The Ortega hypothesis: Citation analysis suggests that only a few scientists contribute to scientific progress. Science 178(4059), 368–375 (1972)
Cronin, B.: The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, p. 103. Taylor Graham, London (1984)
Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining and learning analytics: an updated survey. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Discov. 10(3) (2020)
Peña-Ayala, A.: Educational data mining: a survey and a data mining-based analysis of recent works. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(4), 1432–1462 (2014)
Dormezil, S., Khoshgoftaar, T., Robinson-Bryant, F.: Differentiating between educational data mining and learning analytics: a bibliometric approach. In: Proceedings of the Workshops of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 17–22 (2019)
Fazeli, S., Drachsler, H., Sloep, P.: Socio-semantic networks of research publications in the learning analytics community. In: Proceedings of the LAK Data Challenge (2019)
Garfield, E.: Can citation indexing be automated. In: Symposium Proceedings of the Statistical Association Methods for Mechanized Documentation, pp. 189–192 (1965)
Garzone, M., Mercer, R.E.: Towards an automated citation classifier. In: Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, pp. 337–346 (2000)
Goel, G., Lallé, S., Luengo, V.: Fuzzy logic representation for student modelling. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 428–433 (2012)
Gross, P.L.K., Gross, E.M.K.: College libraries and chemical education. Science 66(1713), 385–389 (1927)
Hopkins, A.L., Jawitz, J.W., McCarty, C., Goldman, A., Basu, N.: Disparities in publication patterns by gender, race and ethnicity based on a survey of a random sample of authors. Scientometrics 96(2), 515–534 (2013)
Khajah, M., Lindsey, R.V., Mozer, M.C.: How deep is knowledge tracing? In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining (2016)
Kizilcec, R., et al.: Scaling up behavioral science interventions in online education. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 117(26), 14900–14905 (2020)
Koedinger, K.R., Baker, R.S., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., Stamper, J.: A data repository for the EDM community: the PSLC DataShop. In: Romero, C., Ventura, S., Pechenizkiy, M., Baker, Ryan S.J.d. (eds.) Handbook of Educational Data Mining, pp. 43–56. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)
Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T., Perfetti, C.: The Knowledge-Learning-Instruction framework: bridging the science-practice chasm to enhance robust student learning. Cogn. Sci. 36(5), 757–798 (2012)
Lindgren, L.: If Robert Merton said it, it must be true: A citation analysis in the field of performance measurement. Evaluation 17(1), 7–19 (2011)
Liu, R., Koedinger, K.R.: Closing the Loop: Automated Data-Driven Cognitive Model Discoveries Lead to Improved Instruction and Learning Gains. Journal of Educational Data Mining 9(1), 25–41 (2017)
Malmi, L., Sheard, J., Kinnunen, P., Sinclair, S., Sinclair, J.: Theories and models of emotions, attitudes, and self-efficacy in the context of programming education. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, pp. 36–47 (2020)
Maturana, R.A., Alvarado, M.E., López-Sola, S., Ibáñez, M.J., Elósegui, L.R.: Linked data based applications for learning analytics research: Faceted searches, enriched contexts, graph browsing and dynamic graphic visualisation of data. In: Proceedings of the LAK Data Challenge (2013)
Mostow, J., Beck, J.E., Valeri, J.: Can automated emotional scaffolding affect student persistence? A baseline experiment. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on “Assessing and Adapting to User Attitudes and Affect: Why, When and How?” at the 9th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'03), pp. 61–64 (2003)
Murphy, R., Roschelle, J., Feng, M., Mason, C.A.: Investigating efficacy, moderators and mediators for an online mathematics homework intervention. J. Res. Educ. Effect. 13(2), 235–270 (2020)
Ostrow, K., Heffernan, N., Williams, J.J.: Tomorrow’s edtech today: establishing a learning platform as a collaborative research tool for sound science. Teach. Coll. Rec. 119(3), 300–306 (2017)
Paquette, L., Ocumpaugh, J., Li, Z., Andres, A., Baker, R.S.: Who’s Learning? Using Demographics in EDM Research. J. Educ. Data Min. 12(3), 1–30 (2020)
Park, J., Choi, H.J.: Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 12(4), 207–217 (2009)
Reich, J.: Rebooting MOOC research. Science 347(6217), 34–35 (2015)
Shockley, W.: On the statistics of individual variations of productivity in research laboratories. Proc. IRE 45(3), 279–290 (1957)
Stamper, J.C., et al.: The rise of the super experiment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Educational Data Mining Society (2012)
VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46(4), 197–221 (2011)
Verbert, K., Duval, E., Klerkx, J., Govaerts, S., Santos, J.L.: Learning analytics dashboard applications. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1500–1509 (2013)
Vinkler, P.: A quasi-quantitative citation model. Scientometrics 12(1–2), 47–72 (1987)
Waheed, H., Hassan, S., Aljohani, N.R., Wasif, M.: A bibliometric perspective of learning analytics research landscape. Behav. Inf. Technol. 37, 10–11 (2018)
Wise, A.F., Jung, Y.: Teaching with analytics: Towards a situated model of instructional decision-making. J. Learn. Anal. 6(2), 53–69 (2019)
Yeung, C., Yeung, D.: Addressing two problems in deep knowledge tracing via prediction-consistent regularization. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on Learning at Scale, pp. 1–10 (2018)
Zhang, J., Shi, X., King, I., Yeung, D.: Dynamic key-value memory networks for knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 765–774 (2017)
Zouaq, A., Joksimovic, S., Gasevic, D.: Ontology learning to analyze research trends in learning analytics publications. In: Proceedings of the LAK Data Challenge (2013)
Krichevsky, N., Spinelli, K., Heffernan, N., Ostrow, K., Emberling, M.R.: E-TRIALS, Doctoral dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nasiar, N., Baker, R.S., Li, J., Gong, W. (2022). How do A/B Testing and Secondary Data Analysis on AIED Systems Influence Future Research?. In: Rodrigo, M.M., Matsuda, N., Cristea, A.I., Dimitrova, V. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13355. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11644-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11643-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11644-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)