Skip to main content

Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Concept Bottleneck Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Image Analysis and Processing. ICIAP 2022 Workshops (ICIAP 2022)

Abstract

Almost all Deep Learning models are dramatically affected by Catastrophic Forgetting when learning over continual streams of data. To mitigate this problem, several strategies for Continual Learning have been proposed, even though the extent of the forgetting is still unclear. In this paper, we analyze Concept Bottleneck (CB) models in the Continual Learning setting and we investigate the effect of high-level features supervision on Catastrophic Forgetting at the representation layer. Consequently, we introduce two different metrics to evaluate the loss of information on the learned concepts as new experiences are encountered. We also show that the obtained Saliency maps remain more stable with the attributes supervision. The code is available at https://github.com/Bontempogianpaolo1/continualExplain

E. Marconato and G. Bontempo—Equal contribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvarez-Melis, D., Jaakkola, T.S.: Towards robust interpretability with self-explaining neural networks (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Francesco, B., Fosca, G., Riccardo, G., Francesca, N., Dino, P., Salvatore, R.: Benchmarking and survey of explanation methods for black box models (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bontempelli, A., Giunchiglia, F., Passerini, A., Teso, S.: Toward a unified framework for debugging gray-box models (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boschini, M., Bonicelli, L., Buzzega, P., Porrello, A., Calderara, S.: Class-incremental continual learning into the eXtended DER-verse. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.00766 (2022)

  5. Chen, C., Li, O., Tao, C., Barnett, A.J., Su, J., Rudin, C.: This looks like that: deep learning for interpretable image recognition. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Lange, M., et al.: A continual learning survey: defying forgetting in classification tasks. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 44, 3366–3385 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ebrahimi, S., et al.: Remembering for the right reasons: explanations reduce catastrophic forgetting. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. French, R.M.: Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3(4), 128–135 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Guidotti, R., Monreale, A., Ruggieri, S., Turini, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D.: A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(5), 1–42 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. He, Y.: Adaptive explainable continual learning framework for regression problems with focus on power forecasts (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirkpatrick, J., et al.: Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 114(13), 3521–3526 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Pang, W.K., et al.: Concept bottleneck models (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lesort, T., Lomonaco, V., Stoian, A., Maltoni, D., Filliat, D., Díaz-Rodríguez, N.: Continual learning for robotics: definition, framework, learning strategies, opportunities and challenges. Inf. Fusion 58, 52–68 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lomonaco, V.: Avalanche: an end-to-end library for continual learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2nd Continual Learning in Computer Vision Workshop (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Paszke, A., et al.: PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d’ Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 32, pp. 8024–8035. Curran Associates Inc. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhu, A., Torr, P.H.S., Dokania, P.K.: GDumb: a simple approach that questions our progress in continual learning. In: Vedaldi, A., Bischof, H., Brox, T., Frahm, J.-M. (eds.) ECCV 2020. LNCS, vol. 12347, pp. 524–540. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58536-5_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Rudin, C.: Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1(5), 206–215 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Selvaraju, R.R., Cogswell, M., Das, A., Vedantam, R., Parikh, D., Batra, D.: Grad-CAM: visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 618–626 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., Wojna, Z.: Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 2818–2826 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. van de Ven, G.M., Tolias, A.S.: Three scenarios for continual learning. arXiv arXiv:1904.07734 (2019)

  21. Welinder, P., et al.: Caltech-UCSD birds 200. Technical report CNS-TR-2010-001, California Institute of Technology (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, C., Bengio, S., Recht, B., Vinyals, O., Hardt, M.: Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Emanuele Marconato , Gianpaolo Bontempo , Stefano Teso , Elisa Ficarra , Simone Calderara or Andrea Passerini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marconato, E., Bontempo, G., Teso, S., Ficarra, E., Calderara, S., Passerini, A. (2022). Catastrophic Forgetting in Continual Concept Bottleneck Models. In: Mazzeo, P.L., Frontoni, E., Sclaroff, S., Distante, C. (eds) Image Analysis and Processing. ICIAP 2022 Workshops. ICIAP 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13374. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13324-4_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13324-4_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13323-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13324-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics