Skip to main content

Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation by Opinion Update

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence (MDAI 2022)

Abstract

We consider a situation where agents are updating their probabilistic opinions on a set of issues with respect to the confidence they have in each other’s judgements. We adapt the framework for reaching a consensus introduced in [2] and modified in [1] to our case of uncertain probabilistic judgements on logically related issues. We discuss possible alternative solutions for the instances where the requirements for reaching a consensus are not satisfied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper we interpret likelihood as probability and we use the two terms interchangeably. Note that, however, likelihood can also be interpreted as another measure of belief, see [5].

  2. 2.

    Expressions containing all the other types of inequalities or equality can be defined as abbreviations.

  3. 3.

    To ensure that every \(\varphi ^M\) is measurable, we may take \(F=2^W.\)

References

  1. Berger, R.: A necessary and sufficient condition for reaching a consensus using DeGroot’s method. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 76, 415–418 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 69, 118–121 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87, 78–128 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(90)90060-U

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Grossi, D., Pigozzi, G.: Judgment Aggregation: A Primer. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA, USA (2014). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027

  5. Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning About Uncertainty. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005). https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/reasoning-about-uncertainty-second-edition

  6. Ivanovska, M., Slavkovik, M.: Aggregating probabilistic judgments. In: Moss, L.S. (ed.) Proceedings Seventeenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2019. EPTCS, vol. 297, pp. 273–292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.297.18, https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.297.18

  7. List, C., Puppe, C.: Judgment aggregation: a survey. In: Anand, P., Puppe, C., Pattanaik, P. (eds.) The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press, UK (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0020

  8. Parsegov, S.E., Proskurnikov, A.V., Tempo, R., Friedkin, N.E.: Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 62, 2270–2285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016.2613905

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Ivanovska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ivanovska, M., Slavkovik, M. (2022). Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation by Opinion Update. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13408. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13447-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13448-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics