Abstract
We consider a situation where agents are updating their probabilistic opinions on a set of issues with respect to the confidence they have in each other’s judgements. We adapt the framework for reaching a consensus introduced in [2] and modified in [1] to our case of uncertain probabilistic judgements on logically related issues. We discuss possible alternative solutions for the instances where the requirements for reaching a consensus are not satisfied.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this paper we interpret likelihood as probability and we use the two terms interchangeably. Note that, however, likelihood can also be interpreted as another measure of belief, see [5].
- 2.
Expressions containing all the other types of inequalities or equality can be defined as abbreviations.
- 3.
To ensure that every \(\varphi ^M\) is measurable, we may take \(F=2^W.\)
References
Berger, R.: A necessary and sufficient condition for reaching a consensus using DeGroot’s method. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 76, 415–418 (1981)
DeGroot, M.H.: Reaching a consensus. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 69, 118–121 (1974)
Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Megiddo, N.: A logic for reasoning about probabilities. Inf. Comput. 87, 78–128 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0890-5401(90)90060-U
Grossi, D., Pigozzi, G.: Judgment Aggregation: A Primer. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA, USA (2014). https://doi.org/10.2200/S00559ED1V01Y201312AIM027
Halpern, J.Y.: Reasoning About Uncertainty. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005). https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/reasoning-about-uncertainty-second-edition
Ivanovska, M., Slavkovik, M.: Aggregating probabilistic judgments. In: Moss, L.S. (ed.) Proceedings Seventeenth Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, TARK 2019. EPTCS, vol. 297, pp. 273–292 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.297.18, https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.297.18
List, C., Puppe, C.: Judgment aggregation: a survey. In: Anand, P., Puppe, C., Pattanaik, P. (eds.) The Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford University Press, UK (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290420.003.0020
Parsegov, S.E., Proskurnikov, A.V., Tempo, R., Friedkin, N.E.: Novel multidimensional models of opinion dynamics in social networks. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 62, 2270–2285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2016.2613905
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ivanovska, M., Slavkovik, M. (2022). Probabilistic Judgement Aggregation by Opinion Update. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13408. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13448-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13447-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13448-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)