Skip to main content

Mixed Reality Agents for Automated Mentoring Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13446))

Abstract

Mentoring processes can enhance education by providing personalized advice and feedback to students. A challenge of mentoring is that with a rising number of students, more mentors are required. As it is oftentimes infeasible to employ such a high number of mentors, automated tools can support the activities of mentors by e.g., answering common questions. However, such tools can impact the students’ engagement as they can feel impersonal. Therefore, we developed mixed reality mentoring agents. They personify these automated tools, can interact directly with the students, and demonstrate practical tasks to them as a guide. On the technical level, this is realized by a behavior tree structure with blackboards that simulate the agent’s memory. With such a visual representation of the behavior, developers, teachers, and mentors alike can edit and define the mentoring capabilities of the agent. The implementation results are open-source and we added them to our Virtual Agents Framework that allows developers to quickly add agents to cross-platform mixed reality applications. Moreover, we conducted a user study with the mentoring prototype. The results are promising as students perceived the mixed reality agents in a positive way, with high usability, and as helpful advisors. Therefore, mixed reality mentoring agents have the potential to become widespread companions for students during their studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/rwth-acis/Virtual-Agents-Framework.

  2. 2.

    https://readyplayer.me.

References

  1. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., Miller, J.: Determining what individual SUS scores mean: adding an adjective rating scale. J. Usabil. Stud. 4(3), 114–123 (2009). http://uxpajournal.org/determining-what-individual-sus-scores-mean-adding-an-adjective-rating-scale/

  2. Bogdanovych, A., Trescak, T.: Presented at the To Plan or Not to Plan: Lessons Learned from Building Large Scale Social Simulations (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67401-8_6

  3. Brooke, J.: SUS: a quick and dirty usability scale. In: Jordan, P.W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B.A., McClelland, I.L. (eds.) Usability Evaluation in Industry, pp. 189–194. Taylor & Francis (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J.: SUS: a retrospective. J. Usabil. Stud. 8(2) (2013). https://doi.org/10.5555/2817912.2817913

  5. Checa, D., Miguel-Alonso, I., Bustillo, A.: Immersive virtual-reality computer-assembly serious game to enhance autonomous learning. Virtual Reality 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-021-00607-1

  6. Delamarre, A., Lisetti, C., Buche, C.: A cross-platform classroom training simulator: interaction design and evaluation. In: 2020 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW), pp. 86–93. IEEE (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/CW49994.2020.00020

  7. Gratch, J., Rickel, J., Andre, E., Cassell, J., Petajan, E., Badler, N.: Creating interactive virtual humans: some assembly required. IEEE Intell. Syst. 17(4), 54–63 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2002.1024753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hammady, R., Ma, M., Strathern, C., Mohamad, M.: Design and development of a spatial mixed reality touring guide to the Egyptian museum. Multim. Tools Appl. 3465–3494 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08026-w

  9. Hensen, B., Klamma, R.: VIAProMa: an agile project management framework for mixed reality. In: De Paolis, L.T., Arpaia, P., Bourdot, P. (eds.) AVR 2021. LNCS, vol. 12980, pp. 254–272. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87595-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Holz, T., Campbell, A.G., O’Hare, G.M., Stafford, J.W., Martin, A., Dragone, M.: MiRA–mixed reality agents. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 69(4), 251–268 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jia, T., Liu, Y.: Words in kitchen: an instance of leveraging virtual reality technology to learn vocabulary. In: Adjunct Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. pp. 150–155. IEEE Computer Society, Conference Publishing Services, Los Alamitos, California (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2019.00-59

  12. Klamma, R., et al.: Scaling mentoring support with distributed artificial intelligence. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds.) ITS 2020. LNCS, vol. 12149, pp. 38–44. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_6

  13. Lankoski, P., Björk, S.: Gameplay design patterns for believable non-player characters. In: DiGRA ’07 - Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play. The University of Tokyo (2007). http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/07315.46085.pdf

  14. Marcotte, R., Hamilton, H.J.: Behavior trees for modelling artificial intelligence in Games: a tutorial. Computer Games J. 6(3), 171–184 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40869-017-0040-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Milgram, P., Kishino, F.: A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. E77-D(12), 1321–1329 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paglis, L.L., Green, S.G., Bauer, T.N.: Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Res. High. Educ. 47(4), 451–476 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-005-9003-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Palmas, F., Cichor, J., Plecher, D.A., Klinker, G.: Acceptance and effectiveness of a virtual reality public speaking training. In: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR), pp. 363–371. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00034

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research for their support within the project “Personalisierte Kompetenzentwicklung durch skalierbare Mentoringprozesse” (tech4comp; id: 16DHB2110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Hensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hensen, B., Bekhter, D., Blehm, D., Meinberger, S., Klamma, R. (2022). Mixed Reality Agents for Automated Mentoring Processes. In: De Paolis, L.T., Arpaia, P., Sacco, M. (eds) Extended Reality. XR Salento 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15553-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15553-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15552-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15553-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics