Abstract
System W is a recently introduced reasoning method for conditional belief bases. While system W exhibits various desirable properties for nonmonotonic reasoning like extending rational closure and fully complying with syntax splitting, an implementation of it has been missing so far. In this paper, we present a first implementation of system W. The implementation is accessible via an extension of an online platform supporting a variety of nonmonotonic reasoning approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adams, E.: The logic of conditionals. Inquiry 8(1–4), 166–197 (1965)
Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kern-Isberner, G.: Skeptical inference based on c-representations and its characterization as a constraint satisfaction problem. In: Gyssens, M., Simari, G. (eds.) FoIKS 2016. LNCS, vol. 9616, pp. 65–82. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_4
Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kutsch, S.: A practical comparison of qualitative inferences with preferred ranking models. KI - Künstliche Intelligenz 31(1), 41–52 (2017)
Beierle, C., von Berg, M., Sanin, A.: Realization of skeptical c-inference as a SAT problem. In: Keshtkar, F., Franklin, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS), Hutchinson Island, Florida, USA, 15–18 May 2022 (2022)
Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kern-Isberner, G., Kutsch, S.: Properties of skeptical c-inference for conditional knowledge bases and its realization as a constraint satisfaction problem. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 83(3–4), 247–275 (2018)
Beierle, C., Eichhorn, C., Kern-Isberner, G., Kutsch, S.: Properties and interrelationships of skeptical, weakly skeptical, and credulous inference induced by classes of minimal models. Artif. Intell. 297, 103489 (2021)
Beierle, C., Haldimann, J.: Normal forms of conditional belief bases respecting inductive inference. In: Keshtkar, F., Franklin, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS), Hutchinson Island, Florida, USA, 15–18 May 2022 (2022)
Beierle, C., Haldimann, J.: Normal forms of conditional knowledge bases respecting system P-entailments and signature renamings. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 90(2), 149–179 (2022)
Benferhat, S., Cayrol, C., Dubois, D., Lang, J., Prade, H.: Inconsistency management and prioritized syntax-based entailment. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1993), vol. 1, pp. 640–647. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1993)
de Finetti, B.: La prévision, ses lois logiques et ses sources subjectives. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré 7(1), 1–68 (1937). Engl. Transl. Theory Probab. (1974)
Goldszmidt, M., Pearl, J.: Qualitative probabilities for default reasoning, belief revision, and causal modeling. Artif. Intell. 84(1–2), 57–112 (1996)
Haldimann, J., Beierle, C.: Inference with system W satisfies syntax splitting. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Lakemeyer, G., Meyer, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, KR 2022, Haifa, Israel, 31 July–5 August 2022, pp. 405–409 (2022)
Haldimann, J., Beierle, C.: Properties of system W and its relationships to other inductive inference operators. In: Varzinczak, I. (ed.) Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems - 12th International Symposium, FoIKS 2022. LNCS, pp. 206–225. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11321-5_12
Haldimann, J.P., Osiak, A., Beierle, C.: Modelling and reasoning in biomedical applications with qualitative conditional logic. In: Schmid, U., Klügl, F., Wolter, D. (eds.) KI 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12325, pp. 283–289. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58285-2_24
Kern-Isberner, G.: A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 40(1–2), 127–164 (2004)
Kern-Isberner, G.: Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44600-1
Kern-Isberner, G., Beierle, C., Brewka, G.: Syntax splitting = relevance + independence: new postulates for nonmonotonic reasoning from conditional belief bases. In: Calvanese, D., Erdem, E., Thielscher, M. (eds.) Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference, KR 2020, pp. 560–571. IJCAI Organization (2020)
Komo, C., Beierle, C.: Nonmonotonic inferences with qualitative conditionals based on preferred structures on worlds. In: Schmid, U., Klügl, F., Wolter, D. (eds.) KI 2020. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12325, pp. 102–115. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58285-2_8
Komo, C., Beierle, C.: Nonmonotonic reasoning from conditional knowledge bases with system W. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 90(1), 107–144 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-021-09777-9
Kraus, S., Lehmann, D.J., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artif. Intell. 44(1–2), 167–207 (1990)
Kutsch, S.: InfOCF-Lib: a Java library for OCF-based conditional inference. In: Proceedings DKB/KIK-2019. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 2445, pp. 47–58. CEUR-WS.org (2019)
Kutsch, S., Beierle, C.: InfOCF-web: an online tool for nonmonotonic reasoning with conditionals and ranking functions. In: Zhou, Z. (ed.) Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2021, Virtual Event/Montreal, Canada, 19–27 August 2021, pp. 4996–4999 (2021). ijcai.org
Kutsch, S., Beierle, C.: Semantic classification of qualitative conditionals and calculating closures of nonmonotonic inference relations. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 130, 297–313 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.12.020
Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artif. Intell. 55, 1–60 (1992)
Parikh, R.: Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages. Logic Lang. Comput. 2, 266–278 (1999)
Pearl, J.: System Z: a natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to nonmonotonic reasoning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge (TARK 1990), pp. 121–135. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1990)
Spohn, W.: Ordinal conditional functions: a dynamic theory of epistemic states. In: Harper, W., Skyrms, B. (eds.) Causation in Decision, Belief Change, and Statistics, II, pp. 105–134. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beierle, C., Haldimann, J., Kollar, D., Sauerwald, K., Schwarzer, L. (2022). An Implementation of Nonmonotonic Reasoning with System W. In: Bergmann, R., Malburg, L., Rodermund, S.C., Timm, I.J. (eds) KI 2022: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13404. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15791-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-15791-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-15790-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-15791-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)