Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

What Teachers Would Expect from a Pedagogical Agent System Working at a Classroom Level: A Focus Group Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption (EC-TEL 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13450))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2036 Accesses

Abstract

Applications of pedagogical agent (PA) systems incorporating animated characters in school settings have mainly addressed students at an individual level. However, how these systems could be used and designed for supporting teachers while taking advantage of artificial intelligence (AI) technology is an open question. Therefore, we carried out a focus group to understand what teachers would expect and need from such a system at a classroom level. Our focus group protocol sought to discover design and practical considerations in four dimensions. 1) System design considerations, where teachers expect the system to incorporate speech recognition and to “learn” from them while doing their practice. 2) System collaboration, teachers wanted support in their pedagogy by considering students’ achievement profiles, and by finding and sorting learning material as needed. 3) PA role in the classroom, we identified the following roles: annotator, scaffolder, peacekeeper, and substitute. 4) PA ethical considerations, teachers perceive PA as a possible replacement threat and controversial opinions on the use and meaning making of this technology. We discuss our findings and present future research directions to develop a PA that could empower teachers with AI pedagogy in the classroom, hence, indirectly supporting learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kong, S.C., Ogata, H., Shih, J.L., Biswas, G.: The role of artificial intelligence in STEM education. In: Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Computers in Education Conference, pp. 774–776. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Taoyuan City (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schroeder, N.L., Adesope, O.O., Gilbert, R.B.: How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(1), 1–39 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, Y., Baylor, A.L.: Research based design of pedagogical agent roles: a review, progress, and recommendations. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(1), 160–169 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martha, A.S.D., Santoso, H.B.: The design and impact of the pedagogical agent: a systematic literature review. J. Educat. Online 16(1), n1 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xhakaj, F., Aleven, V., McLaren, B.M.: How teachers use data to help students learn: contextual inquiry for the design of a dashboard. In: Verbert, K., Sharples, M., Klobučar, T. (eds.) EC-TEL 2016. LNCS, vol. 9891, pp. 340–354. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Albacete, P., Jordan, P., Katz, S., Chounta, I.A., McLaren, B.M.: The impact of student model updates on contingent scaffolding in a natural-language tutoring system. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B., Luckin, R. (eds.) AIED 2019. LNCS, vol. 11625, pp. 37–47. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. VanLehn, K.: The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educ. Psychol. 46(4), 197–221 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nye, B.D.: Barriers to ITS adoption: a systematic mapping study. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds.) ITS 2014. LNCS, vol. 8474, pp. 583–590. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_74

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R.S.: Stupid tutoring systems, intelligent humans. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 26(2), 600–614 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yacef, K.: Intelligent teaching assistant systems. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education, pp. 136–140. IEEE, Washington (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M., Aleven, V.: Intelligent tutors as teachers’ aides: exploring teacher needs for real-time analytics in blended classrooms. In: Proceedings of 7th International Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference, pp. 257–266. ACM, New York (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segedy, J., Sulcer, B., Biswas, G.: Are ILEs ready for the classroom? Bringing teachers into the feedback loop. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6095, pp. 405–407. Springer, Berlin (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13437-1_85

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Chounta, I.A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., Pedaste, M.: Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 1–31 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alfaro, L., Rivera, C., Luna-Urquizo, J., Castañeda, E., Zuñiga-Cueva, J., Rivera-Chavez, M.: New trends in pedagogical agents in education. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, pp. 923–928. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pareto, L., Haake, M., Lindstrõm, P., Sjödén, B., Gulz, A.: A teachable-agent-based game affording collaboration and competition: evaluating math comprehension and motivation. Educ. Tech. Res. Dev. 60(5), 723–751 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saldaña, J.: Fundamentals of Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Creswell, J.W., Poth, C.N.: Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lavrakas, P.J.: Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Thomas, D.R.: A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am. J. Eval. 27(2), 237–246 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia

    Eric Roldan Roa, Doris Kristina Raave & Margus Pedaste

  2. University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Irene-Angelica Chounta

Authors
  1. Eric Roldan Roa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Doris Kristina Raave
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Irene-Angelica Chounta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Margus Pedaste
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Roldan Roa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Isabel Hilliger

  2. Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    Pedro J. Muñoz-Merino

  3. KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Tinne De Laet

  4. Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain

    Alejandro Ortega-Arranz

  5. The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK

    Tracie Farrell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Roa, E.R., Raave, D.K., Chounta, IA., Pedaste, M. (2022). What Teachers Would Expect from a Pedagogical Agent System Working at a Classroom Level: A Focus Group Study. In: Hilliger, I., Muñoz-Merino, P.J., De Laet, T., Ortega-Arranz, A., Farrell, T. (eds) Educating for a New Future: Making Sense of Technology-Enhanced Learning Adoption. EC-TEL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_53

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16290-9_53

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16289-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16290-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation