Skip to main content

Fast Automatic Liver Tumor Radiofrequency Ablation Planning via Learned Physics Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13437))

Abstract

Radiofrequency ablation is a minimally-invasive therapy recommended for the treatment of primary and secondary liver cancer in early stages and when resection or transplantation is not feasible. To significantly reduce chances of local recurrences, accurate planning is required, which aims at finding a safe and feasible needle trajectory to an optimal electrode position achieving full coverage of the tumor as well as a safety margin. Computer-assisted algorithms, as an alternative to the time-consuming manual planning performed by the clinicians, commonly neglect the underlying physiology and rely on simplified, spherical or ellipsoidal ablation estimates. To drastically speed up biophysical simulations and enable patient-specific ablation planning, this work investigates the use of non-autoregressive operator learning. The proposed architecture, trained on 1,800 biophysics-based simulations, is able to match the heat distribution computed by a finite-difference solver with a root mean squared error of 0.51 ± 0.50 \(^\circ \)C and the estimated ablation zone with a mean dice score of 0.93 ± 0.05, while being over 100 times faster. When applied to single electrode automatic ablation planning on retrospective clinical data, our method achieves patient-specific results in less than 4 mins and closely matches the finite-difference-based planning, while being at least one order of magnitude faster. Run times are comparable to those of sphere-based planning while accounting for the perfusion of liver tissue and the heat sink effect of large vessels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    e.g. AngioDynamics StarBurst® system.

References

  1. Altrogge, I., et al.: Towards optimization of probe placement for radio-frequency ablation. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 486–493. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11866565_60

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Audigier, C., et al.: Efficient lattice Boltzmann solver for patient-specific radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 34(7), 1576–1589 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chaitanya, K., Audigier, C., Balascuta, L.E., Mansi, T.: Automatic planning of liver tumor thermal ablation using deep reinforcement learning. In: Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heimbach, J.K., et al.: AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 67(1), 358–380 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kingma, D.P., Ba, J.: Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014)

  6. Klinger, H.: Heat transfer in perfused biological tissue-I: general theory. Bull. Math. Biol. 36, 403–415 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02464617

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Laimer, G., et al.: Minimal ablative margin (MAM) assessment with image fusion: an independent predictor for local tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma after stereotactic radiofrequency ablation. Eur. Radiol. 30(5), 2463–2472 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06609-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liang, L., Cool, D., Kakani, N., Wang, G., Ding, H., Fenster, A.: Automatic radiofrequency ablation planning for liver tumors with multiple constraints based on set covering. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 39(5), 1459–1471 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lu, L., Jin, P., Pang, G., Zhang, Z., Karniadakis, G.E.: Learning nonlinear operators via deepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3(3), 218–229 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mariappan, P., et al.: GPU-based RFA simulation for minimally invasive cancer treatment of liver tumours. Int. J. Comput. Assist. Radiol. Surg. 12(1), 59–68 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1469-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paszke, A., et al.: PyTorch: an imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In: Wallach, H., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d’ Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E., Garnett, R. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pp. 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Payne, S., et al.: Image-based multi-scale modelling and validation of radio-frequency ablation in liver tumours. Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 369(1954), 4233–4254 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pennes, H.H.: Analysis of tissue and arterial blood temperatures in the resting human forearm. J. Appl. Physiol. 1(2), 93–122 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reig, M., et al.: BCLC strategy for prognosis prediction and treatment recommendation barcelona clinic liver cancer (BCLC) staging system. the 2022 update. J Hepatol. 76(3), 681–693 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rieder, C., Kroeger, T., Schumann, C., Hahn, H.K.: GPU-based real-time approximation of the ablation zone for radiofrequency ablation. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graphics 17(12), 1812–1821 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A., Godwin, J., Pfaff, T., Ying, R., Leskovec, J., Battaglia, P.: Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 8459–8468. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sapareto, S.A., Dewey, W.C.: Thermal dose determination in cancer therapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 10(6), 787–800 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Seitel, A., et al.: Computer-assisted trajectory planning for percutaneous needle insertions. Med. Phys. 38(6), 3246–3259 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Thuerey, N., Weißenow, K., Prantl, L., Hu, X.: Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier-stokes simulations of airfoil flows. AIAA J. 58(1), 25–36 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Um, K., Brand, R., Fei, Y.R., Holl, P., Thuerey, N.: Solver-in-the-loop: Learning from differentiable physics to interact with iterative PDE-solvers. Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 33, 6111–6122 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wulff, W.: The energy conservation equation for living tissue. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 6, 494–495 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang, D., et al.: Automatic liver segmentation using an adversarial image-to-image network. In: Descoteaux, M., Maier-Hein, L., Franz, A., Jannin, P., Collins, D.L., Duchesne, Simon (eds.) MICCAI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10435, pp. 507–515. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66179-7_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, R., Wu, S., Wu, W., Gao, H., Zhou, Z.: Computer-assisted needle trajectory planning and mathematical modeling for liver tumor thermal ablation: a review. Math. Biosci. Eng. 16(5), 4846–4872 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Felix Meister .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 88 KB)

539250_1_En_17_MOESM2_ESM.mp4

Planning result for Case 04 - Illustration of the ablation zone growth over time for the finite-difference model at 4 mm grid resolution (green) and the proposed method (blue). Ablation zones and optimal paths are overlayed with the portal vein (orange) and hepatic vein (yellow).

539250_1_En_17_MOESM3_ESM.mp4

Planning result for Case 04 - Illustration of the temperature distribution over time for the finite-difference model at 4 mm grid resolution (green) and the proposed method (blue). Ablation zones and optimal paths are overlayed with the portal vein (orange) and hepatic vein (yellow).

539250_1_En_17_MOESM4_ESM.mp4

Planning result for Case 07-3 - Illustration of the ablation zone growth over time for the finite-difference model at 4 mm grid resolution (green) and the proposed method (blue). Ablation zones and optimal paths are overlayed with the portal vein (orange) and hepatic vein (yellow).

539250_1_En_17_MOESM5_ESM.mp4

Planning result for Case 07-3 - Illustration of the temperature distribution over time for the finite-difference model at 4 mm grid resolution (green) and the proposed method (blue). Ablation zones and optimal paths are overlayed with the portal vein (orange) and hepatic vein (yellow).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Meister, F. et al. (2022). Fast Automatic Liver Tumor Radiofrequency Ablation Planning via Learned Physics Model. In: Wang, L., Dou, Q., Fletcher, P.T., Speidel, S., Li, S. (eds) Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2022. MICCAI 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13437. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16448-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16449-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics