Skip to main content

RDFtex: Knowledge Exchange Between LaTeX-Based Research Publications and Scientific Knowledge Graphs

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2022)

Abstract

Scientific Knowledge Graphs (SciKGs) aim to integrate scientific knowledge in a machine-readable manner. For populating SciKGs, research publications pose a central source of knowledge. The goal is to represent both contextual information, i.e., metadata, and contentual information, i.e., original contributions like definitions and experimental results, of research publications in SciKGs. However, typical forms of research publications like traditional papers do not provide means of integrating contributions into SciKGs. Furthermore, they do not support making direct use of the rich information SciKGs provide. To tackle this, the present paper proposes RDFtex, a framework enabling (1) the import of contributions represented in SciKGs to facilitate the preparation of -based research publications and (2) the export of original contributions to facilitate their integration into SciKGs. As a proof of concept, an RDFtex implementation is provided. We demonstrate the framework’s functionality using the example of the present paper itself since it was prepared using this implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20206 (accessed 2022/07/19).

  2. 2.

    The implementation is written in Python 3.9. The code and other used resources are available at https://github.com/uniba-mi/rdftex (accessed 2022/07/19).

  3. 3.

    https://www.wikidata.org (accessed 2022/07/19).

  4. 4.

    https://www.dbpedia.org (accessed 2022/07/19).

  5. 5.

    We use this terminology to make the distinction between metadata and the actual content more clear since both comprise semantic information but at different levels of abstraction.

  6. 6.

    The use of available vocabularies for the predicates was omitted here.

  7. 7.

    The remaining requirement addressing the need for additional tooling to obtain relevant URIs from a SciKG lies beyond the scope of the present paper (cf. Sect. 4).

  8. 8.

    Our proof-of-concept preprocessor implementation can be configured to be executed whenever a .rdf.tex file changes. Similarly, tools like latexmk (https://ctan.org/pkg/latexmk, accessed 2022/07/19) provide the option to compile projects whenever a .tex file changes. Combining the two, the PDF is compiled fully automatically whenever changes are made to any .rdf.tex file.

  9. 9.

    In the following, single “\(\backslash \)”-symbols indicate lines that are too long. In reality, there are no line breaks.

  10. 10.

    For example, Semantic Scholar (https://www.semanticscholar.org; accessed 2022/07/19) and similar search engines could provide the URIs to a publication’s contributions alongside the links to the publication itself, in the future.

  11. 11.

    https://www.overleaf.com (accessed 2022/07/19).

  12. 12.

    https://query.wikidata.org (accessed 2022/07/19).

References

  1. Auer, S., Kovtun, V., Prinz, M., Kasprzik, A., Stocker, M., Vidal, M.: Towards a knowledge graph for science. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics, WIMS 2018, Novi Sad, Serbia, 25–27 June 2018, pp. 1:1–1:6. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3227609.3227689

  2. Cyganiak, R., Hyland-Wood, D., Lanthaler, M.: RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts. Accessed 19 July 2022

  3. Ernst, P., Siu, A., Weikum, G.: KnowLife: a versatile approach for constructing a large knowledge graph for biomedical sciences. BMC Bioinform. 16, 157:1–157:13 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0549-5

  4. Groza, T., Handschuh, S., Möller, K., Decker, S.: SALT - semantically annotated latex for scientific publications. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 518–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72667-8_37

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Herman, I., Adida, B., Sporny, M., Birbeck, M.: RDFa 1.1 primer (2015). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-primer. Accessed 19 July 2022

  6. Jaradeh, M.Y., et al.: Open research knowledge graph: next generation infrastructure for semantic scholarly knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture, K-CAP 2019, Marina Del Rey, CA, USA, 19–21 November 2019, pp. 243–246. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3360901.3364435

  7. Kohlhase, A., Kohlhase, M., Lange, C.: S\(^{\rm t}\)e\(^{\rm x}\)+: a system for flexible formalization of linked data. In: I-SEMANTICS. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kuhn, T., et al.: Nanopublications: a growing resource of provenance-centric scientific linked data. CoRR (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.06532

  9. Luan, Y., He, L., Ostendorf, M., Hajishirzi, H.: Multi-task identification of entities, relations, and coreference for scientific knowledge graph construction. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, 31 October–4 November 2018, pp. 3219–3232. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1360

  10. Martin, L., Jegan, R., Henrich, A.: On the form of research publications for use in scientific knowledge graphs. In: Wissensorganisation 2021: 16. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) (WissOrg 2021) (2021, accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Project Xanadu: Project Xanadu (2021). https://www.xanadu.net. Accessed 19 July 2022

  12. Saleem, M., Szárnyas, G., Conrads, F., Bukhari, S.A.C., Mehmood, Q., Ngomo, A.N.: How representative is a SPARQL benchmark? An analysis of RDF triplestore benchmarks. In: Liu, L., et al. (eds.) The World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2019, San Francisco, CA, USA, 13–17 May 2019, pp. 1623–1633. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313556

  13. W3C SPARQL Working Group: SPARQL 1.1 overview (2013). https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview. Accessed 19 July 2022

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leon Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Martin, L., Henrich, A. (2022). RDFtex: Knowledge Exchange Between LaTeX-Based Research Publications and Scientific Knowledge Graphs. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics