Skip to main content

A Closer Look into Collaborative Publishing at Software-Engineering Conferences

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries (TPDL 2022)

Abstract

Computer science and particularly software engineering is a rapidly evolving research discipline increasingly conducted by large, collaborative teams. Unfortunately, there is little research on the underlying publication activity and collaboration patterns in software engineering. To address this gap, we study two properties of research collaborations in software engineering: the number of collaborators (i.e., authors of a paper) and their academic age (i.e., their experience of working in research). More precisely, we investigate collaborations for papers published at all main tracks of three top-level software-engineering conferences (i.e., ASE, ESEC/FSE, ICSE) and one top-level reference conference (i.e., JCDL), including a total of 5,188 papers and the corresponding 8,730 unique authors. Our results indicate that collaboration is more prevalent now than ever before, with a decline in the proportion of researchers who contribute single-author papers. Moreover, our analysis revealed that the ideal team size seems to range from two to four researchers, and that junior researchers seem to need the support of more experienced co-authors to get published at such top-level conferences. Ultimately, our goal is to understand how collaborations in software engineering have evolved and impact different researchers (e.g., newcomers, juniors), helping to highlight potential impediments and consequent improvements regarding the quality of research, collaborations, and mentoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6824306.

  2. 2.

    https://dblp.uni-trier.de/.

  3. 3.

    https://dl.acm.org/proceedings.

References

  1. Alchokr, R., Krüger, J., Shakeel, Y., Saake, G., Leich, T.: Understanding the contributions of junior researchers at software-engineering conferences. In: Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL). IEEE (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alchokr, R., Krüger, J., Shakeel, Y., Saake, G., Leich, T.: On academic age aspect and discovering the golden age in software engineering. In: International Conference on Cooperative and Human Aspects of Software Engineering (CHASE). ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alchokr, R., Krüger, J., Shakeel, Y., Saake, G., Leich, T.: Peer-reviewing and submission dynamics around top software-engineering venues: a juniors’ perspective. In: International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE). ACM (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bordons, M., Gomez, I.: Collaboration networks in science. In: The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Garfield (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bultan, T., Whittle, J.: ICSE 2019 PC Chairs Report (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casadevall, A., Semenza, G., Jackson, S., Tomaselli, G., Ahima, R.: Reducing bias: accounting for the order of co-first authors. J. Clin. Investig. 129(6), 2167–2168 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, J., Konstan, J.A.: Conference paper selectivity and impact. Commun. ACM 53(6), 79–83 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Costas, R., Bordons, M.: Do age and professional rank influence the order of authorship in scientific publications? Some evidence from a micro-level perspective. Scientometrics 88, 145–161 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Diem, A., Wolter, S.: The use of bibliometrics to measure research performance in education sciences. Res. High. Educ. 54(1), 86–114 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernandes, J.M.: Authorship trends in software engineering. Scientometrics 101(1), 257–271 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1331-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Godin, B., Gingras, Y.: Impact of collaborative research on academic science. Sci. Public Policy 27(1), 65–73 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hara, N., Solomon, P., Kim, S.L., Sonnenwald, D.H.: An emerging view of scientific collaboration: scientists’ perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(10), 952–965 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Laurance, W.: Second thoughts on who goes where in author lists. Nature 442, 26 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li, W., Aste, T., Caccioli, F., Livan, G.: Early coauthorship with top scientists predicts success in academic careers. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meyer, B., Choppy, C., Staunstrup, J., van Leeuwen, J.: Viewpoint research evaluation for computer science. ACM 52(4), 31–34 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Perretti, F., Negro, G.: Mixing genres and matching people: a study in innovation and team composition in hollywood. J. Organ. Behav. 28, 563–586 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qi, M., Zeng, A., Li, M., Fan, Y., Di, Z.: Standing on the shoulders of giants: the effect of outstanding scientists on young collaborators’ careers. Scientometrics 111, 1839–1850 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Regalado, A.: Multiauthor papers on the rise. Science 268, 25 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rørstad, K., Aksnes, D.: Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position - a large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. J. Informetr. 9(2), 317–333 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Simonin, B.L.: The importance of collaborative know-how: an empirical test of the learning organization. Acad. Manag. J. 40(5), 1150–1174 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tien, F., Blackburn, R.: Faculty rank system, research motivation, and faculty research productivity: measure refinement and theory testing. J. High. Educ. 67(1), 2–22 (1996). Cited By 108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tran, H., Cabanac, G., Hubert, G.: Expert suggestion for conference program committees,pp. 221–232, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wren, J.D., Kozak, K.Z., Johnson, K.R., Deakyne, S.J., Schilling, L.M., Dellavalle, R.P.: The write position. EMBO Rep. 8(11), 988–991 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, M., Mockus, A.: What make long term contributors: willingness and opportunity in OSS community. In: International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 518–528 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zuckerman, H.: Nobel laureates in science: patterns of productivity, collaboration, and authorship. Am. Sociol. Rev. 32(3), 391–403 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rand Alchokr .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alchokr, R., Krüger, J., Shakeel, Y., Saake, G., Leich, T. (2022). A Closer Look into Collaborative Publishing at Software-Engineering Conferences. In: Silvello, G., et al. Linking Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries. TPDL 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13541. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-16801-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-16802-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics