Skip to main content

Latency Resistant Safety in Distributed Remote Laboratories

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 455 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 524))

Abstract

This work will focus on the problems of creating a safe distributed laboratory. We explicitly will not discuss how to make individual elements of an experiment safe, as this is highly application-dependent. Instead, the goal is to find and evaluate different methods to detect and respond to fault conditions that an individual laboratory device might detect. Specifically, the methods should differentiate between user-based faults and those introduced through network communications. We develop a mathematical model to simulate distributed laboratories. We will introduce (time-dependent) network latency and jitter between all elements. Based on the model, a discrete event simulation is created. This simulation environment simulates three different fault detecting methods: the token method, the timestamp method, and the full-state-transfer method. We will compare detection ratios, bandwidth usage, and memory usage between the three methods based on the simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is noteworthy that even at this stage, we can see a considerable difference between the methods resource usage. The parameters were chosen because of the full-state-transfer method. The Timestamp method could handle simulations with at least 20 variables in the same runtime, and the token method could easily handle well over 40 variables.

References

  1. Tawfik M et al (2013) Virtual instrument systems in reality (VISIR) for remote wiring and measurement of electronic circuits on breadboard. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 6(1):60–72. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2012.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Henke K, Vietzke T, Wuttke H-D, Ostendorff S (2016) GOLDi - grid of online lab devices ilmenau. Int J Onl Eng 12(04):11. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v12i04.5005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Durfee W, Li P, Waletzko D (2004) Take-home lab kits for system dynamics and controls courses. In: Proceedings of the 2004 American control conference, 2004, vol 2, pp 1319–1322. https://doi.org/10.23919/ACC.2004.1386757

  4. CrossLab project website. https://cross-lab.org

  5. Functional safety of electrical/electronic/programmable electronic safety-related systems - Part 1: General requirements. International Standard IEC 61508-1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henke K, Vietzke T, Wuttke H-D, Ostendorff S (2015) Safety in interactive hybrid online labs. Int J Onl Eng 11(03):56. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v11i3.4557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nau J, Helbing P: REV2022 Simulation. GitHub repository. https://github.com/jonau/REV2022-Simulation

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Stiftung Innovation in der Hochschullehre, Treuhandstiftung in Trägerschaft der Toepfer Stiftung gGmbH in the project CrossLab [4] (project number FBM2020-VA-182-3-00590).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Nau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nau, J., Helbing, P., Henke, K., Streitferdt, D. (2023). Latency Resistant Safety in Distributed Remote Laboratories. In: Auer, M.E., El-Seoud, S.A., Karam, O.H. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Online Engineering. REV 2022. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 524. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17091-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics