Skip to main content

Scenario for Analysing Student Interactions and Orchestration Load in Collaborative and Hybrid Learning Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing (CollabTech 2022)

Abstract

Educational environments have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and have evolved to support classes, which involve in some cases synchronous hybrid learning environments. These environments enable students attend classes online and on-site simultaneously. Synchronous hybrid environments provide a greater flexibility for students but, in contrast, are likely to increase teachers’ orchestration load and decrease interactions between students, especially between those online and those on-site. This study proposes a scenario to explore the factors affecting the orchestration load and the student interactions in collaborative and synchronous hybrid learning environments. The scenario involves the use of a collaborative learning flow pattern (jigsaw) and the technologies that will enable the data collection to understand such factors affecting to orchestration load and interaction. The outcomes from the implementation of this scenario will provide useful insights to further understand the benefits and limitations of synchronous hybrid learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cahapay, M.B.: Rethinking education in the new normal post-COVID-19 era: a curriculum studies perspective. Aquademia 4(2), ep20018 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Raes, A., et al.: A systematic literature review on synchronous hybrid learning: gaps identified. Learn. Environ. Res. 23(3), 269–290 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UNESCO Education in a post-COVID world: nine ideas for public actions (2020). https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/education_in_a_post-covid_world-nine_ideas_for_public_action.pdf

  4. Prieto, L.P., et al.: Orchestration load indicators and patterns: in-the-wild studies using mobile eye-tracking. IEEE TLT 11(2), 216–229 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bülow, M.W.: Designing synchronous hybrid learning spaces: challenges and opportunities. Hybrid Learn. Spaces, 135–163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88520-5_9

  6. Hernández-Leo, D., et al.: COLLAGE: a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. ET &S 9(1), 58–71 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Flynn-Wilson, L., Reynolds, K.E.: Student responses to virtual synchronous, hybrid, and face-to-face teaching/learning. IJTE 4(1), 46–56 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prieto, L.P., et al.: Supporting orchestration of CSCL scenarios in web-based distributed learning environments. Comput. Educ. 73, 9–25 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, P., et al.: Chao: a framework for the development of orchestration technologies for technology-enhanced learning activities using tablets in classrooms. IJTEL 10(1/2), 1–21 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sammons, P., et al.: Exploring variations in teachers’ work, lives and their effects on pupils: key findings and implications from a longitudinal mixed-method study. BERJ 33(5), 681–701 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kayi-Aydar, H.: Teacher agency, positioning, and English language learners: Voices of pre-service classroom teachers. TATE 45, 94–103 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Manathunga, K., Hernández-Leo, D.: Has research on collaborative learning technologies addressed massiveness? A literature review. ET &S 18(4), 357–370 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hull, M.M., et al.: Validation of a survey to measure pre-service teachers’ sense of agency. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series, vol. 1929, no. 1, p. 012085. IOP Publishing (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Advances in Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 139–183. North-Holland (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Leppink, J., van den Heuvel, A.: The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspect. Med. Educ. 4(3), 119–127 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaffer, D.W., et al.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. JLA 3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Emerson, L., MacKay, B.: A comparison between paper-based and online learning in higher education. BJET 42(5), 727–735 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Amarasinghe, I., et al.: Deconstructing orchestration load: comparing teacher support through mirroring and guiding. IJCSCL 16(3), 307–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-021-09351-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Csanadi, A., et al.: When coding-and-counting is not enough: using epistemic network analysis (ENA) to analyze verbal data in CSCL research. IJCSCL 13(4), 419–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9292-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang, L., et al.: Examining different types of collaborative learning in a complex computer-based environment: a cognitive load approach. CHB 27(1), 94–98 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grant PID2020-112584RB-C31, PID2020-112584RB-C32 and PID2020-112584RB-C33 funded by MCIN/ AEI /10.13039/501100011033, and in part by the Madrid Regional Government through the e-Madrid-CM Project under Grant S2018/TCS-4307 and under the Multiannual Agreement with UC3M in the line of Excellence of University Professors (EPUC3M21), and in the context of the V PRICIT (Regional Programme of Research and Technological Innovation), a project which is co-funded by the European Structural Funds (FSE and FEDER). Partial support has also been received from the European Commission through Erasmus+ Capacity Building in the Field of Higher Education projects, more specifically through projects InnovaT and PROF-XXI (598758-EPP-1-2018-1-AT-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP), (609767-EPP-1-2019-1-ES-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP). This publication reflects the views only of the authors and funders cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrián Carruana Martín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carruana Martín, A., Ortega-Arranz, A., Alario-Hoyos, C., Amarasinghe, I., Hernández-Leo, D., Delgado Kloos, C. (2022). Scenario for Analysing Student Interactions and Orchestration Load in Collaborative and Hybrid Learning Environments. In: Wong, LH., Hayashi, Y., Collazos, C.A., Alvarez, C., Zurita, G., Baloian, N. (eds) Collaboration Technologies and Social Computing. CollabTech 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13632. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20218-6_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20217-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20218-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics