Skip to main content

Resolving Learners Misunderstandings Using an Adaptive Divide and Correct Technique

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia Intelligence (MoMM 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13634))

  • 288 Accesses

Abstract

The education system is one of the main government sectors that has been affected by COVID-19 pandemic. Most governments around the world have temporarily closed educational institutions and distance learning imposed a massive impact on students’ learning processes. In an online teaching and learning environment, handling students’ misunderstandings is a challenging and time-consuming task. Many of the proposed solutions for handling students’ misunderstandings are highly demanding on teachers, and suffer from lack of descriptively. In this paper, we propose a novel adaptive divide and correct technique to assist teachers in providing formative feedback to students. Additionally, we lower teachers’ cognitive load in comprehending misunderstandings by measuring their semantical commonality. Our experiment results showed that our approach could significantly augment teachers in providing formative feedback to a large number of students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper, we use the terms teachers and instructors interchangeably and both refer to a person who helps students to acquire knowledge.

  2. 2.

    In a one-to-one feedback model instructors provided feedback case by case to students.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/tmikolov/word2vec.

  4. 4.

    We consider misunderstandings over 75 % cosine measure as similar.

  5. 5.

    All experiments are carried out on cloud platform (Amazon Web Service (AWS)).

  6. 6.

    By writing feedback for every misunderstanding or choosing among the previously given feedback.

  7. 7.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA-TLX.

References

  1. Acharya, A., Sinha, D.: Early prediction of students performance using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 107(1), 37–43 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beheshti, A., Ghodratnama, S., Elahi, M., Farhood, H.: Social Data Analytics. CRC Press (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beheshti, S.-M.-R., Tabebordbar, A., Benatallah, B., Nouri, R.: On automating basic data curation tasks. In: WWW Conference, pp. 165–169 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cameron, S.E.: Teachers as learners: learning in the lives of teachers (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dyckhoff, A.L., et al.: Design and implementation of a learning analytics toolkit for teachers. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 15(3), 58–76 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Falchikov, N., Goldfinch, J.: Student peer assessment in higher education: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev. Educ. Res. 70(3), 287–322 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gašević, D., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S.: Piecing the learning analytics puzzle: a consolidated model of a field of research and practice. Learn. Res. Pract. 3(1), 63–78 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geigle, C., Zhai, C., Ferguson, D.C.: An exploration of automated grading of complex assignments. In: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 351–360 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., Struyven, K.: Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learn. Instr. 20(4), 304–315 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goel, A.K., Joyner, D.A.: An experiment in teaching cognitive systems online. Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Head, A., Glassman, E., Soares, G., Suzuki, R., Figueredo, L., et al.: Writing reusable code feedback at scale with mixed-initiative program synthesis. In: Fourth ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 89–98 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jain, L.C., Tsihrintzis, G.A., Alepis, E., Virvou, M.: Machine Learning Paradigms. Advances in Learning Analytics, Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13743-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Joyner, D.A.: Scaling expert feedback: two case studies. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 71–80 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karthikeyan, K., Palaniappan, K.: On improving student performance prediction in education systems using enhanced data mining techniques. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. Softw. Eng. 7, 935–941 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kavitha, M., Raj, D., et al.: Educational data mining and learning analytics-educational assistance for teaching. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.03327 (2017)

  16. Khatami, A., Nazari, A., Beheshti, A., Nguyen, T.T., Nahavandi, S., Zieba, J.: Convolutional neural network for medical image classification using wavelet features. In: 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu, Y., Warren, J., Jermaine, C., Chaudhuri, S., Rixner, S.: Grading the graders: motivating peer graders in a MOOC. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 680–690 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lundstrom, K., Baker, W.: To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 18, 30–43 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Máñez, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., Kendeou, P., Martínez, T.: How do students process complex formative feedback in question-answering tasks? A think-aloud study. Metacognition Learn. 14(1), 65–87 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-019-09192-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ngoon, T.J., Fraser, C.A., Weingarten, A.S., Dontcheva, M., Klemmer, S.: Interactive guidance techniques for improving creative feedback. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–11 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rokach, L., Maimon, O.: Clustering methods. In: Maimon, O., Rokach, L. (eds.) Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook, pp. 321–352. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25465-X_15

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Salzmann, C., Gillet, D., Piguet, Y.: MOOLs for MOOCs: a first edX scalable implementation. In: 2016 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), pp. 246–251. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sievertsen, H.H., Burgess, S.: Schools, skills, and learning: the impact of COVID-19 on education (2020). https://voxeu.org/article/impact-covid-19-education

  25. Singh, A., Karayev, S., Gutowski, K., Abbeel, P.: Gradescope: a fast, flexible, and fair system for scalable assessment of handwritten work. In: Proceedings of the Fourth (2017) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 81–88 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stephens-Martinez, K., Ju, A., Schoen, C., DeNero, J., Fox, A.: Identifying student misunderstandings using constructed responses. In: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, pp. 153–156 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Troussas, C., Espinosa, K.J., Virvou, M.: Intelligent advice generator for personalized language learning through social networking sites. In: International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications, pp. 1–5 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Troussas, C., Virvou, M., et al.: Using visualization algorithms for discovering patterns in groups of users for tutoring multiple languages through social networking. JNW 10(12), 668–674 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., Van Merriënboer, J.: Effective peer assessment processes: research findings and future directions. Learn. Instr. 20(4), 270–279 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vogelsang, T., Ruppertz, L.: On the validity of peer grading and a cloud teaching assistant system. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 41–50 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, S., et al.: Assessment2Vec: learning distributed representations of assessments to reduce marking workload. In: Roll, I., McNamara, D., Sosnovsky, S., Luckin, R., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) AIED 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12749, pp. 384–389. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78270-2_68

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Yaron, D., Karabinos, M., Lange, D., et al.: The ChemCollective—virtual labs for introductory chemistry courses. Science 358, 584–585 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the AI-enabled Processes (AIP (https://aip-research-center.github.io/)) Research Centre and ITIC Pty Ltd (https://www.iticlive.com/) for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amin Beheshti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tabebordbar, A., Beheshti, A., Rezvani, N., Asadnia, M., Elbourn, S. (2022). Resolving Learners Misunderstandings Using an Adaptive Divide and Correct Technique. In: Delir Haghighi, P., Khalil, I., Kotsis, G. (eds) Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia Intelligence. MoMM 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13634. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20436-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20436-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20436-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics