Abstract
Cooperative survival games are a sub-class of resource competition games wherein self-interest appears to be the rational choice in the short-term, but if every ‘player’ always acts out of self-interest, extinction is guaranteed in the long-term. The situation is dramatised in the film The Platform (El Hoyo); in this paper, we implement a self-organising multi-agent system that approximately recreates the cooperative survival game depicted in this film. In a series of experiments, we investigate how communication, a pre-existing tendency to sociality (characterised by social motives) and a capacity for social construction (characterised by social contracts) enables a collective of random individuals to establish a stable institution that increases their overall life expectancy. The experimental results provide some insight into how a pro-social personality and the ability to bootstrap institutions enable a random collective to find a psychologically and sociologically plausible solution to what is effectively a cooperative survival game merged with Rawl’s Veil of Ignorance.
Supported by Imperial College London and the Swiss Study Foundation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It is, for example, not possible for an agent to sign a treaty asking it to take 5 food, when it has already signed a treaty requesting it to take 0 food.
References
Ashby, W.: Design for a Brain; The Origin of Adaptive Behavior - Scholar’s Choice Edition, Chap. 4–5. Creative Media Partners, LLC (2015)
Berger, P., Luckmann, T.: The Social Construction of Reality. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth (1966)
Briggs, J.: Never in Anger: Portrait of an Eskimo Family. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1970)
Campbell, W.K., Goodie, A.S., Foster, J.D.: Narcissism, confidence, and risk attitude. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 17(4), 297–311 (2004)
Davoust, A., Rovatsos, M.: Social contracts for non-cooperative games. In: AIES 2020: Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 43–49. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020)
Fishburn, P.C.: Utility theory for decision making. Technical report, Research Analysis Corp McLean VA (1970)
Fishburn, P.C.: Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory, p. 2. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1988)
Hobfoll, S.E.: Conservation of resource caravans and engaged settings. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 84(1), 116–122 (2011)
Hobfoll, S.E., Shirom, A., Golembiewski, R.: Conservation of resources theory. In: Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 57–80 (2000)
Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk, pp. 99–127. World Scientific (2013)
Kong, A., Thorleifsson, G.: The nature of nurture: effects of parental genotypes. Science 359(6374), 424–428 (2018)
Norberg-Hodge, H.: Ancient Futures: Learning from Ladakh. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco (1991)
Norris, D.: Short-term memory and long-term memory are still different. Psychol. Bull. 143(9), 992 (2017)
Oppenheimer, O.: The origin of social motives. Educ. Theory 4(2), 95–104 (1954)
Ostrom, E.: Governing the Commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Pitt, J.: Self-Organising Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 149–151. World Scientific, Singapore (2021)
Ramchurn, S., Huynh, T., Jennings, N.: Trust in multi-agent systems. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 19, 1–25 (2004)
Rawls, J., Kelly, E.: Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Belknap Press, Cambridge (2001)
Reinders Folmer, C.: Social motives. In: The SAGE Encyclopedia of Theory in Psychology. pp. 886–890. SAGE (2016)
Schelling, T.C.: The strategy of conflict prospectus for a reorientation of game theory. J. Conflict Resolut. 2(3), 203–264 (1958)
Thorndike, E.L.: The law of effect. Am. J. Psychol. 39(1/4), 212–222 (1927)
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful to the three anonymous reviewers whose many insightful comments helped to revise and improve the presentation of this work. The experiments reported in this paper have used the Imperial College London 2021–22 SOMAS Cohort’s engine, and many thanks to everyone involved in the creation of this platform (sic).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Scott, M., Dubied, M., Pitt, J. (2022). Social Motives and Social Contracts in Cooperative Survival Games. In: Ajmeri, N., Morris Martin, A., Savarimuthu, B.T.R. (eds) Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, Norms, and Ethics for Governance of Multi-Agent Systems XV. COINE 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13549. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20845-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20845-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-20844-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-20845-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)