Skip to main content

Network Topology to Predict Bibliometrics Indices: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 602 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13635))

Abstract

Co-authorship networks have been widely studied in recent years, but today new techniques and increasing computational power permit performing novel analysis and evaluate larger datasets. One of the emerging topic is the investigation of the reasons that determine the success of some people among the others. Researchers and academic community are of interest because the metric to evaluate their performance, although widely debated, are consolidated and based on bibliometrics indices, that are quantifiable. Moreover, the paradigm of complex networks added another perspective that, often, allows discovering hidden behaviors. This paper proposes an analysis of four large datasets related to Italian academic working for public institutions, and grouped by law in academic disciplines, using network analysis tools in order to compare their structure and characteristics highlighting, if any, similarities and difference. Moreover, applying a machine learning approach, the authors try to predict some bibliometric indices using network topology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Italian Ministry of University and Research.

References

  1. Elsevier Developer - Academic Research. Accessed July 2021

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elsevier Developer - API Service Agreement. Accessed July 2021

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ministero dell’Universitá e della Ricerca - Professori e Ricercatori. Accessed May 2021

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scopus fact sheet. www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/114533/Scopus-fact-sheet-2022_WEB.pdf. Accessed April 2022

  5. Barabási, A., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T.: Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Stat Mech Appl 311(3), 590–614 (2002). www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378437102007367

  6. Brandes, U.: A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J. Math. Sociol. 25(2), 163–177 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Analysis of the co-authorship sub-networks of Italian academic researchers. Stud. Comput. Intell. 1015, 321–327 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Co-authorship networks analysis to discover collaboration patterns among Italian researcher. Future Internet 14 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Correlation between researchers’ centrality and h-index: a case study. In: Intelligent Distributed Computing XV. Springer, Heidelberg (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Preliminary characterization of Italian academic scholars by their bibliometrics. In: Camacho, D., Rosaci, D., Sarné, G.M.L., Versaci, M. (eds.) Intelligent Distributed Computing XIV, pp. 343–354. Springer, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96627-0_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Carchiolo, V., Longheu, A., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G.: Communities unfolding in multislice networks. In: da F. Costa, L., Evsukoff, A., Mangioni, G., Menezes, R. (eds.) CompleNet 2010. CCIS, vol. 116, pp. 187–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25501-4_19

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Clauset, A., Larremore, D.B., Sinatra, R.: Data-driven predictions in the science of science. Science 355(6324), 477–480 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fortunato, S., et al.: Science of science. Science 359(6379) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102(46), 16569–16572 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Molontay, R., Nagy, M.: Two decades of network science: as seen through the co-authorship network of network scientists. In: Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, ASONAM 2019, pp. 578–583. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Newman, M.E.J.: Finding community structure in networks using the eigenvectors of matrices. Phys. Rev. E 74, 036104 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69, 026113 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicosia, V., Mangioni, G., Carchiolo, V., Malgeri, M.: Extending the definition of modularity to directed graphs with overlapping communities. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2009(03), P03024 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Opsahl, T., Agneessens, F., Skvoretz, J.: Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Social Netw. 32(3), 245–251 (2010). www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378873310000183

  20. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. In: WWW 1999 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Peixoto, T.P.: Efficient monte carlo and greedy heuristic for the inference of stochastic block models. Phys. Rev. E 89, 012804 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Vespignani, A.: Twenty years of network science (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684), 440–442 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Zeng, A., et al.: The science of science: from the perspective of complex systems. Phys. Rep. 714, 1–73 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has been partially supported by the project of University of Catania PIACERI, PIAno di inCEntivi per la Ricerca di Ateneo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincenza Carchiolo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Figure 6 shows a bivariate analysis of each centrality measures respect to H-index, Fig. 7 and 8 show a bivariate analysis of document-count and citation-count. In the figures, the cyan refers to MAT/05, yellow to INF/01, green to ING-INF/05, and, finally, orange to SECS-P/01.

Fig. 6.
figure 6

Centrality measure vs. H-index

Fig. 7.
figure 7

Centrality measure vs. Document-count

Fig. 8.
figure 8

Centrality measure vs. Citation-count

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carchiolo, V., Grassia, M., Malgeri, M., Mangioni, G. (2022). Network Topology to Predict Bibliometrics Indices: A Case Study. In: Pardede, E., Delir Haghighi, P., Khalil, I., Kotsis, G. (eds) Information Integration and Web Intelligence. iiWAS 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13635. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21047-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21047-1_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21046-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21047-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics