Skip to main content

A Cascade of Checkers for Run-time Certification of Local Robustness

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Software Verification and Formal Methods for ML-Enabled Autonomous Systems (NSV 2022, FoMLAS 2022)

Abstract

Neural networks are known to be susceptible to adversarial examples. Different techniques have been proposed in the literature to address the problem, ranging from adversarial training with robustness guarantees to post-training and run-time certification of local robustness using either inexpensive but incomplete verification or sound, complete, but expensive constraint solving. We advocate for the use of a run-time cascade of over-approximate, under-approximate, and exact local robustness checkers. The exact check in the cascade ensures that no unnecessary alarms are raised, an important requirement for autonomous systems where resorting to fail-safe mechanisms is highly undesirable. Though exact checks are expensive, via two case studies, we demonstrate that the exact check in a cascade is rarely invoked in practice. Code and data are available at https://github.com/ravimangal/cascade-robustness-impl.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    \([m] := \{0,\ldots ,m-1\}\).

  2. 2.

    Safety of Shared Control in Autonomous Driving.

References

  1. Alzantot, M., Sharma, Y., Elgohary, A., Ho, B.J., Srivastava, M., Chang, K.W.: Generating natural language adversarial examples. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2890–2896. Association for Computational Linguistics, Brussels, Belgium (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Athalye, A., Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Obfuscated gradients give a false sense of security: circumventing defenses to adversarial examples. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 274–283. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bastani, O., Ioannou, Y., Lampropoulos, L., Vytiniotis, D., Nori, A.V., Criminisi, A.: Measuring neural net robustness with constraints. In: Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2621–2629. NIPS’16, Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Towards evaluating the robustness of neural networks. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 39–57. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2017.49,https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SP.2017.49

  5. Carlini, N., et al.: Hidden voice commands. In: 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 16), pp. 513–530 (2016). https://www.usenix.org/conference/usenixsecurity16/technical-sessions/presentation/carlini

  6. Carlini, N., Wagner, D.: Audio adversarial examples: targeted attacks on speech-to-text. In: 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops (SPW), pp. 1–7 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, J., Rosenfeld, E., Kolter, Z.: Certified adversarial robustness via randomized smoothing. In: Chaudhuri, K., Salakhutdinov, R. (eds.) In: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, vol. 97, pp. 1310–1320. PMLR (2019). https://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/cohen19c.html

  8. Croce, F., Hein, M.: Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2206–2216. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dvijotham, K., Stanforth, R., Gowal, S., Mann, T., Kohli, P.: A dual approach to scalable verification of deep networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Conference Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI-18), pp. 162–171. AUAI Press, Corvallis, Oregon (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fromherz, A., Leino, K., Fredrikson, M., Parno, B., Păsăreanu, C.: Fast geometric projections for local robustness certification. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gehr, T., Mirman, M., Drachsler-Cohen, D., Tsankov, P., Chaudhuri, S., Vechev, M.: Ai2: Safety and robustness certification of neural networks with abstract interpretation. In: 2018 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 3–18 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gilmer, J., Ford, N., Carlini, N., Cubuk, E.: Adversarial examples are a natural consequence of test error in noise. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2280–2289. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples. In: Bengio, Y., LeCun, Y. (eds.) In: 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7–9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings (2015). http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572

  14. Jia, R., Liang, P.: Adversarial examples for evaluating reading comprehension systems. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2021–2031. Association for Computational Linguistics, Copenhagen, Denmark (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Katz, G., Barrett, C., Dill, D.L., Julian, K., Kochenderfer, M.J.: Reluplex: an efficient SMT solver for verifying deep neural networks. In: Majumdar, R., Kunčak, V. (eds.) CAV 2017. LNCS, vol. 10426, pp. 97–117. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63387-9_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Katz, G., et al.: The marabou framework for verification and analysis of deep neural networks. In: Dillig, I., Tasiran, S. (eds.) CAV 2019. LNCS, vol. 11561, pp. 443–452. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25540-4_26

  17. LeCun, Y., Cortes, C., Burges, C.: MNIST handwritten digit database (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lecuyer, M., Atlidakis, V., Geambasu, R., Hsu, D., Jana, S.: Certified robustness to adversarial examples with differential privacy. In: 2019 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 656–672. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leino, K., Wang, Z., Fredrikson, M.: Globally-robust neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Madry, A., Makelov, A., Schmidt, L., Tsipras, D., Vladu, A.: Towards deep learning models resistant to adversarial attacks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mirman, M., Gehr, T., Vechev, M.: Differentiable abstract interpretation for provably robust neural networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3578–3586. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pakdamanian, E., Sheng, S., Baee, S., Heo, S., Kraus, S., Feng, L.: Deeptake: prediction of driver takeover behavior using multimodal data. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI ’21, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445563

  23. Papernot, N., et al.: Technical report on the cleverhans v2.1.0 adversarial examples library. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.00768 (2018)

  24. Papernot, N., McDaniel, P., Goodfellow, I., Jha, S., Celik, Z.B., Swami, A.: Practical black-box attacks against machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Asia Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 506–519 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Qin, Y., Carlini, N., Cottrell, G., Goodfellow, I., Raffel, C.: Imperceptible, robust, and targeted adversarial examples for automatic speech recognition. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5231–5240 (2019). http://proceedings.mlr.press/v97/qin19a.html

  26. Raghunathan, A., Steinhardt, J., Liang, P.: Certified defenses against adversarial examples. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2018). https://openreview.net/forum?id=Bys4ob-Rb

  27. Salman, H., Yang, G., Li, J., Zhang, P., Zhang, H., Razenshteyn, I., Bubeck, S.: Provably robust deep learning via adversarially trained smoothed classifiers. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 11292–11303 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Singh, G., Gehr, T., Püschel, M., Vechev, M.: Robustness certification with refinement. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=HJgeEh09KQ

  29. Singh, G., Gehr, T., Püschel, M., Vechev, M.: An abstract domain for certifying neural networks. Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 3(POPL), 1–30 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Szegedy, C., et al.: Intriguing properties of neural networks. In: Bengio, Y., LeCun, Y. (eds.) In: 2nd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2014, Banff, AB, Canada, April 14–16, 2014, Conference Track Proceedings (2014). http://arxiv.org/abs/1312.6199

  31. Tjeng, V., Xiao, K.Y., Tedrake, R.: Evaluating robustness of neural networks with mixed integer programming. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019). https://openreview.net/forum?id=HyGIdiRqtm

  32. Tramer, F., Carlini, N., Brendel, W., Madry, A.: On adaptive attacks to adversarial example defenses. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Weng, L., et al.: Towards fast computation of certified robustness for relu networks. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5276–5285. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wong, E., Kolter, Z.: Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 5286–5295. PMLR (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Yang, G., Duan, T., Hu, J.E., Salman, H., Razenshteyn, I., Li, J.: Randomized smoothing of all shapes and sizes. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 10693–10705. PMLR (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Jiao, J., Xing, E., El Ghaoui, L., Jordan, M.: Theoretically principled trade-off between robustness and accuracy. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7472–7482. PMLR (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by DARPA GARD Contract HR00112020006 and UK’s Assuring Autonomy International Programme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ravi Mangal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mangal, R., Păsăreanu, C. (2022). A Cascade of Checkers for Run-time Certification of Local Robustness. In: Isac, O., Ivanov, R., Katz, G., Narodytska, N., Nenzi, L. (eds) Software Verification and Formal Methods for ML-Enabled Autonomous Systems. NSV FoMLAS 2022 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13466. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21222-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21222-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-21221-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-21222-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics