Abstract
The task of portfolio management is the selection of portfolio allocations for every single time step during an investment period while adjusting the risk-return profile of the portfolio to the investor’s individual level of risk preference. In practice, it can be hard for an investor to quantify his individual risk preference. As an alternative, approximating the risk-return Pareto front allows for the comparison of different optimized portfolio allocations and hence for the selection of the most suitable risk level. Furthermore, an approximation of the Pareto front allows the analysis of the overall risk sensitivity of various investment policies. In this paper, we propose a deep reinforcement learning (RL) based approach, in which a single meta agent generates optimized portfolio allocation policies for any level of risk preference in a given interval. Our method is more efficient than previous approaches, as it only requires training of a single agent for the full approximate risk-return Pareto front. Additionally, it is more stable in training and only requires per time step market risk estimations independent of the policy. Such risk control per time step is a common regulatory requirement for e.g., insurance companies. We benchmark our meta agent against other state-of-the-art risk-aware RL methods using a realistic environment based on real-world Nasdaq-100 data. Our evaluation shows that the proposed meta agent outperforms various benchmark approaches by generating strategies with better risk-return profiles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abrate, C., et al.: Continuous-action reinforcement learning for portfolio allocation of a life insurance company. In: Dong, Y., Kourtellis, N., Hammer, B., Lozano, J.A. (eds.) ECML PKDD 2021. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 12978, pp. 237–252. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86514-6_15
Akaike, H.: A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19(6), 716–723 (1974)
Almahdi, S., Yang, S.Y.: An adaptive portfolio trading system: a risk-return portfolio optimization using recurrent reinforcement learning with expected maximum drawdown. Expert Syst. Appl. 87, 267–279 (2017)
André, E., Coqueret, G.: Dirichlet policies for reinforced factor portfolios. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.05381 (2020)
Ariyo, A.A., Adewumi, A.O., Ayo, C.K.: Stock price prediction using the Arima model. In: 2014 UKSim-AMSS 16th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation, pp. 106–112. IEEE (2014)
Bisi, L., Sabbioni, L., Vittori, E., Papini, M., Restelli, M.: Risk-averse trust region optimization for reward-volatility reduction. In: Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence Special Track, pp. 4583–4589. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization (2020)
Black, F., Litterman, R.: Global portfolio optimization. Finan. Analy. J. 48(5), 28–43 (1992)
Boyd, S., et al.: Multi-period trading via convex optimization. Found. Trends Optim. 3(1), 1–76 (2017)
Brigham, E.F., Ehrhardt, M.C.: Financial Management: Theory & Practice. Cengage Learning (2019)
Chow, Y., Ghavamzadeh, M., Janson, L., Pavone, M.: Risk-constrained reinforcement learning with percentile risk criteria. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 18(1), 6070–6120 (2017)
Costa, G., Kwon, R.: A regime-switching factor model for mean-variance optimization. J. Risk (2020)
Fujimoto, S., Hoof, H., Meger, D.: Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1587–1596. PMLR (2018)
Guercio, D.D., Reuter, J.: Mutual fund performance and the incentive to generate alpha. J. Financ. 69(4), 1673–1704 (2014)
Hassan, M.R., Nath, B.: Stock market forecasting using hidden Markov model: a new approach. In: 5th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA 2005), pp. 192–196. IEEE (2005)
Hiransha, M., Gopalakrishnan, E.A., Menon, V.K., Soman, K.: NSE stock market prediction using deep-learning models. Procedia Comput. Sci. 132, 1351–1362 (2018)
Markowitz, H.: Portfolio selection. J. Finan. 7(1), 77–91 (1952)
Munim, Z.H., Shakil, M.H., Alon, I.: Next-day bitcoin price forecast. J. Risk Finan. Manag. 12(2), 103 (2019)
Navon, A., Shamsian, A., Fetaya, E., Chechik, G.: Learning the pareto front with hypernetworks. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021)
Nguyen, N.: Hidden Markov model for stock trading. Int. J. Finan. Stud. 6(2), 36 (2018)
Pang, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, P., Lin, W., Chang, V.: An innovative neural network approach for stock market prediction. J. Supercomput. 76(3), 2098–2118 (2020)
Parisotto, E., et al.: Stabilizing transformers for reinforcement learning. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7487–7498. PMLR (2020)
Pirotta, M., Parisi, S., Restelli, M.: Multi-objective reinforcement learning with continuous pareto frontier approximation. In: Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2015)
Plappert, M., et al.: Parameter space noise for exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.01905 (2017)
Roijers, D.M., Vamplew, P., Whiteson, S., Dazeley, R.: A survey of multi-objective sequential decision-making. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 48, 67–113 (2013)
Sato, M., Kobayashi, S.: Variance-penalized reinforcement learning for risk-averse asset allocation. In: Leung, K.S., Chan, L.-W., Meng, H. (eds.) IDEAL 2000. LNCS, vol. 1983, pp. 244–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44491-2_34
Schulman, J., Wolski, F., Dhariwal, P., Radford, A., Klimov, O.: Proximal policy optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347 (2017)
Schwarz, G.: Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Statist. 6, 461–464 (1978)
Sharpe, W.F.: The sharpe ratio. Streetwise Best J. Portfolio Manag. 3, 169–185 (1998)
Sobel, M.J.: The variance of discounted Markov decision processes. J. Appl. Probab. 19, pp. 794–802 (1982)
Wang, H., Zhou, X.Y.: Continuous-time mean-variance portfolio selection: a reinforcement learning framework. Math. Financ. 30(4), 1273–1308 (2020)
Wu, N., Green, B., Ben, X., O’Banion, S.: Deep transformer models for time series forecasting: the influenza prevalence case. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08317 (2020)
Zhang, S., Liu, B., Whiteson, S.: Mean-variance policy iteration for risk-averse reinforcement learning. In: AAAI (2021)
Acknowledgments
This work has been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) under Grant No. 01IS18036A. The authors of this work take full responsibility for its content.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Winkel, D., Strauß, N., Schubert, M., Seidl, T. (2023). Risk-Aware Reinforcement Learning for Multi-Period Portfolio Selection. In: Amini, MR., Canu, S., Fischer, A., Guns, T., Kralj Novak, P., Tsoumakas, G. (eds) Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. ECML PKDD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13718. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26422-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26422-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-26421-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-26422-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)