Skip to main content

A Review of the Muddy Children Problem

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 483 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13796))

Abstract

The “Muddy Children” puzzle is a well known problem in the multi-agent epistemic reasoning literature, however it has not been studied in other fields of Artificial Intelligence. In this paper, we present the “Muddy Children” problem as a challenge to the Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science community. The interesting aspect of this problem is that agents have asymmetric and incomplete information; and each agent needs to reason about his own knowledge as well as knowledge of other agents. The existing solutions use Kripke structure and possible world semantics which are not scalable for large problem sizes. Hence we stimulate for alternative solution methodologies and discover its relation to the other problems in the applied sciences. We go over several variations of the Muddy Children puzzle and discuss the challenges for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When we omit the set of agents in the formulae \(C_{\alpha }\), we assume \(\alpha = \mathcal{A}\mathcal{G}\).

References

  1. Baral, C., Gelfond, G., Son, T.C., Pontelli, E.: Using answer set programming to model multi-agent scenarios involving agents’ knowledge about other’s knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 1, pp. 259–266 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J.: Scenes and other situations. J. Philos. 78(7), 369–397 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bolander, T., Andersen, M.: Epistemic planning for single and multi-agent systems. J. Appl. Non-Classical Logics 21(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bolander, T.: A gentle introduction to epistemic planning: the del approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.02192 (2017)

  5. Van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic, 1st edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Engesser, T., Bolander, T., Mattmüller, R., Nebel, B.: Cooperative epistemic multi-agent planning for implicit coordination. In: Ghosh, S., Ramanujam, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Ninth Workshop on Methods for Modalities, M4M@ICLA 2017, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India, 8th to 10th January 2017. EPTCS, vol. 243, pp. 75–90 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Gierasimczuk, N., Szymanik, J.: A note on a generalization of the muddy children puzzle. In: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 257–264 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, X., Fang, B., Wan, H., Liu, Y.: A general multi-agent epistemic planner based on higher-order belief change. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2017) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kominis, F., Geffner, H.: Beliefs in multiagent planning: from one agent to many. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, ICAPS 2015, Jerusalem, Israel, 7–11 June 2015, pp. 147–155 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liu, Q., Liu, Y.: Multi-agent epistemic planning with common knowledge. In: Lang, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI 2018, Stockholm, Sweden, 13–19 July 2018, pp. 1912–1920. ijcai.org (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McCarthy, J.: Formalization of two puzzles involving knowledge. Formalizing Common Sense: Papers by John McCarthy, pp. 158–166 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Son, T.C., Pontelli, E., Baral, C., Gelfond, G.: Finitary S5-theories. In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds.) JELIA 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8761, pp. 239–252. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. van Tilburg, G.: Doe wel en zie niet om (do well and don’t look back). Katholieke Illustratie (Catholic Illustrated Journal) 90(32), 47 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuf Izmirlioglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Izmirlioglu, Y., Pham, L., Son, T.C., Pontelli, E. (2023). A Review of the Muddy Children Problem. In: Dovier, A., Montanari, A., Orlandini, A. (eds) AIxIA 2022 – Advances in Artificial Intelligence. AIxIA 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13796. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27181-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-27180-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-27181-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics