Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Requirements Engineering Issues Experienced by Software Practitioners: A Study on Stack Exchange

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13975))

Abstract

[Context and Motivation] Requirements engineering (RE) is central to software development. Despite its importance, there are many issues related to its enactment. Question and answer platforms, such as the Stack Exchange, are paramount in contemporary software development. They discuss and bring to light practitioners’ viewpoints on software engineering issues. Approaching those platforms focusing on RE deserves investigation because it can reveal current issues experienced by software practitioners and possible solutions for them. [Question/Problem] This work investigates RE issues, their causes, effects, and possible solutions as discussed by software practitioners in the Software Engineering Stack Exchange (SWESE). For that, we mine, curate, and analyze a set of 61 discussions related to RE, composed of 414 posts and 770 comments extracted from SWESE. [Principal Ideas/Results] We identify 50 issues and their relations with requirements phases. Customers’ unable to describe system requirements and the need for detailed specifications are among the most commonly discussed issues. We also list 20 causes, 23 effects, and 59 solutions for the mined issues. Examples of causes for RE issues are lack of technical knowledge and communication issues. Examples of the effects of RE issues are rework and unstable requirements. Solutions encompass practices such as clearly defining requirements and using prototypes. [Contribution] This work organizes the mined RE issues in a Sankey diagram, relating them to RE phases and solutions, which may assist practitioners experiencing them and serve as guidance for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Nuseibeh, B., Easterbrook, S.: Requirements engineering: a roadmap. In: Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, pp. 35–46, ACM, New York, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernández, D.M., et al.: Naming the pain in requirements engineering. Empir. Softw. Eng. 22(5), 2298–2338 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-016-9451-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nikula, U., Sajaniemi, J., Kälviäinen, H.: A state-of-the-practice survey on requirements engineering in small-and medium-sized enterprises. Research Report 951-764-431-0, Telecom Business Research Center Lappeenranta (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Solemon, B., Sahibuddin, S., Ghani, A.A.A.: Requirements engineering problems and practices in software companies: an industrial survey. In: Ślęzak, D., Kim, T.-H., Kiumi, A., Jiang, T., Verner, J., Abrahão, S. (eds.) ASEA 2009. CCIS, vol. 59, pp. 70–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10619-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, L., Li, T., Peng, F.: Why requirements engineering fails: a survey report from China. In: 18th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, pp. 317–322 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pekar, V., Felderer, M., Breu, R.: Improvement methods for software requirement specifications: a mapping study. In: 9th International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 242–245 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rios, N., et al.: Hearing the voice of software practitioners on causes, effects, and practices to deal with documentation debt. In: Madhavji, N., Pasquale, L., Ferrari, A., Gnesi, S. (eds.) REFSQ 2020. LNCS, vol. 12045, pp. 55–70. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44429-7_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbosa, L., et al.: Organizing the TD management landscape for requirements and requirements documentation debt. In: Workshop on Requirements Engineering (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bonfim, V.D., Benitti, F.B.V.: Requirements debt: causes, consequences, and mitigating practices. In: International Conference on Software Engineering & Knowledge Engineering, pp. 13–18, Pittsburgh (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rios, N., Mendonça, M., Spínola, R.: A tertiary study on technical debt: types, management strategies, research trends, and base information for practitioners. Inf. Softw. Technol. 102, 117–145 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamei, F., et al.: Grey literature in software engineering: a critical review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 138, 106609 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Barua, A., Thomas, S.W., Hassan, A.E.: What are developers talking about? An analysis of topics and trends in stack overflow. Empir. Softw. Eng. 19, 619–654 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tahir, A., Dietrich, J., Counsell, S., Licorish, S., Yamashita, A.: A large scale study on how developers discuss code smells and anti-pattern in stack exchange sites. Inf. Softw. Technol. 125, 106333 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montandon, J.E., Politowski, C., Silva, L.L., Valente, M.T., Petrillo, F., Guéhéneuc, Y.: What skills do IT companies look for in new developers? A study with stack overflow jobs. Inf. Softw. Technol. 129, 106429 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gama, E., Freire, S., Mendonça, M., Spínola, R., Paixao, M., Cortés, M.I.: Using stack overflow to assess technical debt identification on software projects. In: Brazilian Symposium on Software Engineering, pp. 730–739 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gomes, F., dos Santos, E.P., Freire, S., Mendonça, M., Mendes, T.S., Spínola, R.: Investigating the point of view of project management practitioners on technical debt. In: IEEE/ACM International Conference on Technical Debt, pp. 31–40 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. dos Santos, E.P., Gomes, F., Freire, S., Mendonça, M., Mendes, T.S., Spínola, R.: Technical debt on agile projects: managers’ point of view at Stack Exchange. In: Brazilian Symposium on Software Quality. ACM, New York (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vasilescu, B., Serebrenik, A., Devanbu, P., Filkov, V.: How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In: 17th Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 342–354 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmad, A., Feng, C., Ge, S., Yousif, A.: A survey on mining stack overflow: question and answering (Q&A) community. Data Technol. Appl. 52, 190–247 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rios, N., Spínola, R.O., Mendonça, M., Seaman, C.: The practitioners’ point of view on the concept of technical debt and its causes and consequences: a design for a global family of industrial surveys and its first results from Brazil. Empir. Softw. Eng. 25(5), 3216–3287 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09832-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sengupta, S., Haythornthwaite, C.: Learning with comments: an analysis of comments and community on Stack Overflow. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2898–2907 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ahasanuzzaman, M., Asaduzzaman, M., Roy, C.K., Schneider, K.A.: Mining duplicate questions of stack overflow. In: IEEE/ACM Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, pp. 402–412. IEEE (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kavaler, D., Posnett, D., Gibler, C., Chen, H., Devanbu, P., Filkov, V.: Using and asking: APIs used in the android market and asked about in Stack Overflow. In: Jatowt, A., et al. (eds.) SocInfo 2013. LNCS, vol. 8238, pp. 405–418. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. ISO/IEC/IEEE International Standard: Systems and software engineering–life cycle processes–requirements engineering. In: ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2018(E), pp. 1–104 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Freire, S., et al.: Requirements engineering issues experienced by software practitioners: a study on stack exchange-complementary material. Zenodo (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7647916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lupton, R.C., Allwood, J.M.: Hybrid Sankey diagrams: visual analysis of multidimensional data for understanding resource use. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 124, 141–151 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., Wesslén, A.: Experimentation in Software Engineering. Springer, Cham (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

    Sávio Freire, Felipe Gomes, Larissa Barbosa, Rita S. P. Maciel & Manoel Mendonça

  2. Federal Institute of Ceará, Morada Nova, Ceará, Brazil

    Sávio Freire

  3. Federal Institute of Bahia, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

    Thiago Souto Mendes

  4. Salvador University, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil

    Galdir Reges & Rodrigo Spínola

  5. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA

    Rodrigo Spínola

Authors
  1. Sávio Freire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felipe Gomes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larissa Barbosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thiago Souto Mendes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Galdir Reges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rita S. P. Maciel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Manoel Mendonça
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Rodrigo Spínola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodrigo Spínola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. CNR ISTI, Pisa, Italy

    Alessio Ferrari

  2. Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Birgit Penzenstadler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Freire, S. et al. (2023). Requirements Engineering Issues Experienced by Software Practitioners: A Study on Stack Exchange. In: Ferrari, A., Penzenstadler, B. (eds) Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality. REFSQ 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13975. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29786-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29786-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29785-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29786-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation