Skip to main content

An Empirical Study to Predict Student Performance Using Information of the Virtual Learning Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online (HELMeTO 2022)

Abstract

This study aims to explore a new feature model and a set of machine learning classifiers to predict student performance by monitoring his/her activities on the Virtual Learning Environment (VLE). The features are used for training the classifier to predict the final result of each student. The proposed model is evaluated by using a dataset built at the Open University of London. The results show good performance (80% of accuracy) of the proposed approach compared to other similar studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hernandez-Blanco, A., et al.: A systematic review of deep learning approaches to educational data mining. Complexity 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bengio, Y., Lecun, Y., Hinton, G.: Deep learning for AI. Commun. ACM 64(7), 58–65 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M.: On the students’ misconceptions in object-oriented language constructs. In: HELMeTO 2019, pp. 97–112 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M.: Software analytics to support students in object-oriented programming tasks: an empirical study. IEEE Access 8, 132171–132187 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., De Ruvo, G.: Learning analytics to improve coding abilities: a fuzzy-based process mining approach. In: FUZZ-IEEE 2019, pp. 1–7 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., Maggi, F.M.: Evaluating coding behavior in software development processes: a process mining approach. In: ICSSP 2019, pp. 84–93 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ardimento, P., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., De Ruvo, G.: Mining developer’s behavior from web-based IDE logs. In: WETICE 2019, pp. 277–282 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abu Zohair, L.M.: Prediction of Student’s performance by modelling small dataset size. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16(1), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0160-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Data mining in education. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 3(1), 12–27 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Alyahyan, E., Düştegör, D.: Predicting academic success in higher education: literature review and best practices. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 17(1), 1–21 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0177-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Namoun, A., Alshanqiti, A.: Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: a systematic literature review. Appl. Sci. 11(1), 237 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Private University. http://www.ugcuniversities.gov.bd/private-universities. Accessed 27 Feb 2020

  13. Adom, A.Y.: Students’ factors preference of choosing private university in Sarawak, Malaysia. In: Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Conference on Business and Social Sciences (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kabra, R., Bichkar, R.: Performance prediction of engineering students using decision trees. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 36(11), 8–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shahiri, A.M., Husain, W., et al.: A review on predicting student’s performance using data mining techniques. Procedia Comput. Sci. 72, 414–422 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kapur, B., Ahluwalia, N., Sathyaraj, R.: Comparative study on marks prediction using data mining and classification algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 8(3) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ramesh, V., Parkavi, P., Ramar, K.: Predicting student performance: a statistical and data mining approach. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 63(8), 35–39 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bogarin, A., Romero, C., Cerezo, R., Santillan, M.S.: Clustering for improving educational process mining. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 11–15. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Coffrin, C., Corrin, L., de Barba, P., Kennedy, G.: Visualizing patterns of student engagement and performance in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 83–92. ACM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bunkar, K., Singh, U.K., Pandya, B., Bunkar, R.: Data mining: prediction for performance improvement of graduate students using classification. In: Wireless and Optical Communications Networks (WOCN), pp. 1–5. IEEE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. bin Mat, U., Buniyamin, N., Arsad, P.M., Kassim, R.: An overview of using academic analytics to predict and improve students’ achievement: a proposed proactive intelligent intervention. In: 2013 IEEE 5th Conference on Engineering Education (ICEED), pp. 126–130. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Simsek, A., Balaban, J.: Learning strategies of successful and unsuccessful university students. Online Submission 1(1), 36–45 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Romero, C., Lopez, M.I., Luna, J.M., Ventura, S.: Predicting students’ final performance from participation in on-line discussion forums. Comput. Educ. 68, 458–472 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thai-Nghe, N., Horvath, T., Schmidt-Thieme, L.: Factorization models for forecasting student performance. In: Educational Data Mining 2011 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Osmanbegovic, E., Suljic, M.: Data mining approach for predicting student performance. Econ. Rev. 10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tair, M.M.A., El-Halees, A.M.: Mining educational data to improve students performance: a case study. Int. J. Inf. 2 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Conrad Tucker, B.K.P., Divinsky, A.: Mining student-generated textual data in MOOCs and quantifying their effects on student performance and learning outcomes. In: 2014 ASEE Annual Conference, Indianapolis, Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana (2014). https://peer.asee.org/22840

  28. So, Y., Kuhfeld, W.F.: Multinomial logit models. In: SUGI 20 Conference Proceedings, vol. 1995 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang, M.-L., Zhou, Z.-H.: ML-KNN: a lazy learning approach to multi-label learning. Pattern Recogn. 40(7), 2038–2048 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Fawagreh, K., Gaber, M.M., Elyan, E.: Random forests: from early developments to recent advancements. Syst. Sci. Control Eng. 2(1), 602–609 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Geurts, P., Ernst, D., Wehenkel, L.: Extremely randomized trees. Mach. Learn. 63(1), 3–42 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Moraes, R., Valiati, J.F., Neto, W.P.G.: Document-level sentiment classification: an empirical comparison between SVM and ANN. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(2), 621–633 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Eashwar, K., Venkatesan, R., Ganesh, D.: Student performance prediction using SVM. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. 8(11), 649–662 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Attali, J.-G., Pages, G.: Approximations of functions by a multilayer perceptron: a new approach. Neural Netw. 10(6), 1069–1081 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bentejac, C., Csorgo, A., Munoz, G.M.: A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms. Artif. Intell. Rev. 54(3), 1937–1967 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: XGBoost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dorogush, A.V., Ershov, V., Gulin, A.: CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features support. CoRR, abs/1810.11363 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kőrösi, G., Farkas, R.: MOOC performance prediction by deep learning from raw clickstream data. In: Singh, M., Gupta, P.K., Tyagi, V., Flusser, J., Ören, T., Valentino, G. (eds.) ICACDS 2020. CCIS, vol. 1244, pp. 474–485. Springer, Singapore (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6634-9_43

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Tarik, A., Aissa, H., Yousef, F.: Artificial intelligence and machine learning to predict student performance during the COVID-19. Procedia Comput. Sci. 184, 835–840 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zohair, A., Mahmoud, L.: Prediction of student’s performance by modelling small dataset size. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 16(1), 1–18 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lerina Aversano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aversano, L., Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., Iammarino, M., Montano, D., Verdone, C. (2023). An Empirical Study to Predict Student Performance Using Information of the Virtual Learning Environment. In: Fulantelli, G., Burgos, D., Casalino, G., Cimitile, M., Lo Bosco, G., Taibi, D. (eds) Higher Education Learning Methodologies and Technologies Online. HELMeTO 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1779. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29800-4_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29799-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29800-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics