Skip to main content

Grammar Induction for Under-Resourced Languages: The Case of Ch’ol

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13160))

Abstract

We apply to the under-resourced language Ch’ol the Womb Grammar Model of grammar induction (WGM), thus called because given appropriate input it can generate grammars for different languages, much as human wombs can generate different races. The WGM is inferential, works for more than just specific tasks and needs neither a pre-specified model family, nor parallel corpora, nor any of the typical models of machine learning. It generates an understudied language’s grammar using representative and correct input sentences in that language, together with its lexicon relevant to that input, all of which is parsed with respect to the correct grammar of a well-studied language, or alternatively, of a “universal” grammar. The errors that inevitably result serve to guide the production of the desired grammar. We present the main framework describing the model and the results of our experiments, inferring Ch’ol grammar from English grammar and suggest some future lines of research in the area.

This paper has been supported by projects PAPIIT-UNAM TA400121, CONACYT CB A1-S-27780 and by V. Dahl’s research grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada NSERC grant 31611021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ethnologue.com/.

  2. 2.

    The name Womb Grammars came to Dahl’s mind after chancing upon a quote by Churchill that praised Canadians as “virile people” (sic). The thought that such fallacies of composition could be repeated unblushingly, and that there were no female equivalents of expressions such as “seminal contribution”, suggested to her that it was time to create praising associations with female-specific terms too. “Womb Grammars” hints at the analogy between human wombs, which can generate different races given appropriate input, and the system she was naming, which can generate different languages’ grammars given appropriate linguistic input.

References

  1. Adebara, I.: Using womb grammars for inducing the grammar of a subset of Yorùbá noun phrases. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adebara, I., Dahl, V.: Grammar induction as automated transformation between constraint solving models of language. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Knowledge-based Techniques for Problem Solving and Reasoning Co-located with 25th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2016), New York City, USA, 10 July 2016 (2016). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1648/paper6.pdf

  3. Alejos, J., Martínez, N.: Ch’oles, 3rd edn., pp. 19–33. Comisión nacional para el desarrollo de los pueblos indígenas, México (2007). iSBN 0 471 40300

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becerra Bonache, L., Dahl, V., Miralles, J.E.: On second language tutoring through womb grammars. In: Rojas, I., Joya, G., Gabestany, J. (eds.) IWANN 2013. LNCS, vol. 7902, pp. 189–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38679-4_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Becerra-Bonache, L., Dahl, V., Miralles, J.E.: The role of universal constraints in language acquisition. In: Duchier, D., Parmentier, Y. (eds.) CSLP 2012. LNCS, vol. 8114, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41578-4_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Blache, P.: Property grammars and the problem of constraint satisfaction. In: ESSLLI-2000 Workshop on Linguistic Theory and Grammar Implementation (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blache, P.: Property grammars: a fully constraint-based theory. In: Christiansen, H., Skadhauge, P.R., Villadsen, J. (eds.) CSLP 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3438, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11424574_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen, H.: CHR grammars (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Christiansen, H., Dahl, V.: V.: Assumptions and abduction in prolog. In: Workshop on Multiparadigm Constraint Programming Languages (MultiCPL 2004), Saint-Malo, France (2004). Workshop notes (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dahl, V., Blache, P.: Extracting selected phrases through constraint satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the Constraint Satisfaction and Language Processing SLP 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dahl, V., Miralles, E.: Womb grammars: Constraint solving for grammar induction. In: Sneyers, J., Frühwirth, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Constraint Handling Rules. Technical report CW 624, pp. 32–40. Department of Computer Science, K.U. Leuven (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dahl, V., Miralles, E., Becerra, L.: On language acquisition through womb grammars. In: CSLP, pp. 99–105 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dahl, V., Tarau, P., Li, R.: Assumption grammars for processing natural language. In: ICLP (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dahl, V., Tessaris, S., De Sousa Bispo, M.: Parsing as semantically guided constraint solving: the role of ontologies. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 82(1), 161–185 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-018-9573-2

  15. Duchier, D., Dao, T., Parmentier, Y.: Model-theory and implementation of property grammars with features. J. Log. Comput. 24(2), 491–509 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exs080

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Frühwirth, T.: Theory and practice of constraint handling rules. J. Log. Program. 37(1), 95–138 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0743-1066(98)10005-5

  17. Warkentin, V., Scott, R.: Gramática ch’ol. Instituto Lingüístico de verano, México (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nichols, J.: Head-marking and dependent-marking grammar. Language 62(1), 56–119 (1986). https://www.jstor.org/stable/415601

  19. Vázquez Álvarez, J.: A grammar of Chol, a Mayan language. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gemma Bel-Enguix .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix I: Examples of Ch’ol Given to the Program, with the PoS Tagging and the English Translation

Appendix I: Examples of Ch’ol Given to the Program, with the PoS Tagging and the English Translation

Table 5. Examples provided to the system

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dahl, V., Bel-Enguix, G., Tirado, V., Miralles, E. (2023). Grammar Induction for Under-Resourced Languages: The Case of Ch’ol. In: Lopez-Garcia, P., Gallagher, J.P., Giacobazzi, R. (eds) Analysis, Verification and Transformation for Declarative Programming and Intelligent Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13160. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31476-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31476-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-31475-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-31476-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics