Abstract
With artificial intelligence (AI) technology development, decision support systems (DSS) supporting human judgment are applied to multi-agent systems (MAS) as an interactive automated system. Despite the development of automation in systems, human judgment is important to prevent system failures due to impaired situational awareness under uncertainty. In human judgment, uncertainty can affect neural correspondence which induces cognitive bias, resulting in distorted judgment. Therefore, neural correspondences under uncertainty for appropriate judgments should be considered. This paper suggests understanding neural correspondence with multiple information judgments under uncertainty. For uncertainty, we used expected and unexpected uncertainty concepts influencing trustworthiness for the system performance. We used electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural correspondence in the multiple information judgment system. Based on the analysis of neural correspondence, we found that the cognitive process is based on linguistic and mathematical processing. With having trust in the system, humans can experience a strong incongruent situation by observing poor system performance. This study will give insights into cognitive process improvements of the multiple probability information judgment system through understanding neural correspondence under uncertainty.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balaji, P., Srinivasan, D.: An introduction to multi-Agent systems. In: Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 1–27 (2010)
Khan, A., Gupta, S., Gupta, S.K.: Cooperative control between multi-UAVs for maximum coverage in disaster management: review and proposed model. In: 2022 2nd International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT) (2022)
Tweedale, J.W., Ichalkaranje, N., Sioutis, C., Jarvis, B., Consoli, A., Phillips-Wren, G.: Innovations in multi-agent systems. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 30, 1089–1115 (2007)
Khemakhem, F., Ellouzi, H., Ltifi, H., Ayed, M.B.: Agent-based intelligent decision support systems: a systematic review. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Dev. Syst. 14(1), 20–34 (2022)
Gupta, S., Modgil, S., Bhattacharyya, S., Bose, I.: Artificial intelligence for decision support systems in the field of operations research: review and future scope of research. Ann. Oper. Res. 308, 215–274 (2021)
Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Camerer, C.F.: Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human Decision-Making. Science 310(5754), 1680–1683 (2005)
Geng, B., Brahma, S., Wimalajeewa, T., Varshney, P.K., Rangaswamy, M.: Prospect Theoretic utility based human decision making in multi-Agent systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 68, 1091–1104 (2020)
Sokolowski, J.A.: Enhanced decision modeling using multiagent system simulation. Simulation 79(4), 232–242 (2003)
Guedea-Elizalde, F., Karray, F., Soto, R., Song, I., Basir, O.: Multi-agent CORBA-based robotics vision architecture for cue integration. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (2003)
Dzindolet, M.T., Peterson, S., Pomranky, R.A., Pierce, L.G., Beck, H.P.: The role of trust in automation reliance. Int. J. Hum Comput Stud. 58(6), 697–718 (2003)
Yu, A.J., Dayan, P.: Uncertainty, neuromodulation, and attention. Neuron 46(4), 681–692 (2005)
Firoz, K.F., Seong, Y., Oh, S.: A neurological approach to classify trust through EEG signals using machine learning techniques. In: 2022 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (2022)
Dijkstra, N., De Groot, K., Rietveld, C.A.: Entrepreneurial orientation and decision-making under risk and uncertainty: experimental evidence from the Columbia Card Task. Appl. Psychol. 72(4), 1577–1592 (2022)
Johnson, J., Busemeyer, J.R.: Decision making under risk and uncertainty. WIREs Cognit. Sci. 1(5), 736–749 (2010)
Heal, G., Millner, A.: Reflections: uncertainty and decision making in climate change. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 8(1), 120–137 (2014)
Brehmer, B., Slovic, P.: Information integration in multiple-cue judgments. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 6(2), 302–308 (1980)
Mata, R., Von Helversen, B., Karlsson, L., Cüpper, L.: Adult age differences in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. Dev. Psychol. 48(4), 1188–1201 (2012)
Juslin, P., Olsson, H., Olsson, A.-C.: Exemplar effects in categorization and multiple-cue judgment. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132(1), 133–156 (2003)
Juslin, P., Karlsson, L., Olsson, H.: Information integration in multiple cue judgment: a division of labor hypothesis. Cognition 106(1), 259–298 (2008)
Heintzman, L.: A predictive autonomous decision aid for calibrating Human-Autonomy reliance in multi-Agent task assignment. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.10252
Firoz, K.F., Seong, Y.: A Neural study of intuitive mode of cognition while decision-making using Artificial Grammar Learning paradigm. In: Proceedings of the IISE Annual Conference & Expo 2023 (2023)
Long, Y., Jiang, X., Zhou, X.: To believe or not to believe: trust choice modulates brain responses in outcome evaluation. Neuroscience 200, 50–58 (2012)
Kogler, L., Sailer, U., Derntl, B., Pfabigan, D.M.: Processing expected and unexpected uncertainty is modulated by fearless-dominance personality traits – an exploratory ERP study on feedback processing. Physiol. Behav. 168, 74–83 (2017)
De Visser, E.J., et al.: Learning from the slips of others: neural correlates of trust in Automated agents. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 12, 1–16 (2018)
Choo, S., Nam, C.S.: Detecting human trust calibration in automation: a convolutional neural network approach. IEEE Trans. Hum.-Mach. Syst. 52(4), 774–783 (2022)
Firoz, K.F., Seong, Y., Chang, Y.-S.: A preliminary study on human trust in pseudo-real-time scenario through electroencephalography and machine learning based data classification. In: 1st International Conference on Smart Mobility and Vehicle Electrification (2023)
Wang, C., Li, Y., Fu, W., Jin, J.: Whether to trust chatbots: applying the event-related approach to understand consumers’ emotional experiences in interactions with chatbots in e-commerce. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 73, 103325 (2023)
Dong, S.-Y., Kim, B.-K., Lee, K.-H., Lee, S.Y.: A preliminary study on human trust measurements by EEG for human-machine interactions. In: HAI 2015: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, pp. 265–268 (2015)
Lim, S.H., Nisar, H., Thee, K.W., Yap, V.V.: A novel method for tracking and analysis of EEG activation across brain lobes. Biomed. Signal Process. Control 40, 488–504 (2018)
Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: EEGLAB: an open-source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134, 9–21 (2004)
Sur, S., Vk, S.: Event-related potential: an overview. Ind. Psychiatry J. 18(1), 70–73 (2009)
Kutas, M., Federmeier, K.D.: Thirty years and Counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 621–647 (2011)
Daltrozzo, J., Wioland, N., Kotchoubey, B.: The N400 and late positive complex (LPC) effects reflect controlled rather than automatic mechanisms of sentence processing. Brain Sci. 2(3), 267–297 (2012)
Acknowledgments
This research is based upon work supported by the ONR (Award No. N00014-22-1-2724). The views and conclusions contained herein are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies or endorsements, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chang, YS., Seong, Y., Yi, S. (2024). Neural Correspondence to Environmental Uncertainty in Multiple Probability Judgment Decision Support System. In: Harris, D., Li, WC. (eds) Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics. HCII 2024. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 14692. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60728-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60728-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-60727-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-60728-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)