Skip to main content

Website Accessibility of U.S. Based Hospitality Websites

  • Conference paper

Abstract

The Internet has become an essential part of our society as we are continually embracing this technology to better facilitate our business and social lives. Hotels and restaurants have established websites providing functions such as room availability, menu description as well as online reservations. However, many of the hospitality web designers have neglected the difficulties that visitors with disabilities like visual impairment may have when they visit the websites. This study evaluated the current accessibility situation of current U.S. based hospitality websites and studied the potential problems those websites may have when presenting information to visitors with disabilities. By evaluating the sample hospitality websites under the criteria of Section 508, the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, colorblind filter and text size flexibility, the study has found that the current accessibility of hospitality websites in the U.S. is low and failure in providing alternative text for non-text elements is the primary problem. Implications of possible reasons and future research suggestions are discussed accordingly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brewer, J. (2004). Why Standards Harmonization is Essential to Web Accessibility. Retrieved on February 15, 2008 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/EO/Drafts/standard-harmon.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, A. (2003). Integrating Accessible Design into the Educational Web Design Process. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, 6(1). Retrieved March 20, 2008 from http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/win2003/accessibility/introduction.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Foley, A. & Regan, B. (2002). Web Design for Accessibility: Policies and Practice, Educational Technology Review, 10(1), pp. 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, C. Loucopoulos, C. and Reinsch, R. (2005). Disability-accessibility of airlines’ Web sites for US reservations online, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, 239–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner, M., Heilbronner, S., and Green, C. (2006). Profits and pitfalls of online marketing: A legal desk reference for travel executives. A TIG global special report. 5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, S. (2007). Just ask: integrating accessibility throughout design. Retrieved online February 17, 2008 from http://www.uiaccess.com/accessucd/

    Google Scholar 

  • Kailes, J.I., and D. Jones. (1993). Guide to Planning Accessible Meetings, Independent Living Research Utilization (ILRU) Research and Training Center on Independent Living at TIRR. Houston.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPlante, Mitchell P., and Carlson, D. (1992) Disability in the United States, Prevalence and Causes. Retrieved March 10 2008 from http://dsc.ucsf.edu/pub_listing.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, A., (2003). Travel trends: disabled travel. Hemispheres 11, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankoff, J., Fait, H., and Tran, T. (2005). Is Your Web Page Accessible? A Comparative Study of Methods for Assessing Web Page Accessibility for the Blind, Web Interactions, 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. Han, J.H. Clay, J.M. (2008). Accessibility of Hospitality and Tourism Websites: A Challenge for Visually Impaired Persons. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 49(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulton, G. Huyler, L. Hertz, J and Levenson, M. (2002). Accessible Technology in Today’s Business. Microsoft Press. 28–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Namkung, Y. Shin, S.Y. and Yang, S. (2007). A Ground Theory Approach to Understanding the Website Experiences of Restaurant Customers, Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 10(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1993). Usability engineering. San Diego. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., & Frew, A. J. (2004). An evaluation methodology for hotel electronic channels of distribution. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 23(2), 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P. (2004). Conflicting Viewpoints on Web Design. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 17(2/3), 225–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Paciello, M (2000). Web Accessibility for People with Disabilities, Focal Press. 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2006). Internet Penetration and Impact. Retrieved April 14, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/182/report_display.asp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet & American Life Project (2004). Older Americans and the Internet, Retrieved April 14, 2008 from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Seniors_Online_2004.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. & Stylianou, A (2003). Global corporate Websites: An empirical investigation of content and design, Information & Management. (40), 205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Salerno, N. (2007). More Hotel Web Site Myths...Busted! Retrieved on February 14, 2008 from http://www.hotelnewsresource.com/article27247.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Section 508 (1998). Section 508 Amendment of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, http://www.section508.gov

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz E. (2006). Americans with disabilities: 2002. Current Population Reports, U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved April 15 2008 from: http://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp/p70s/p70-107.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetman C. (2002) Commercial Value of Web Site Accessibility-Disabled Access To the Internet, the Morgan Cole monthly feature, April 17,2002, retrieved on November 25th, 2007, from http://www.itwales.com/999600.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, H. (2000) How the Internet is improving the lives of Americans with disabilities: the Harris Poll #30 Retrieved on February 21, 2008 from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/ harris_poll/index.asp?PID=93

    Google Scholar 

  • The Disability Rights Commission. (2004). The Web: Access and Inclusion for Disabled People, retrieved on November 17, 2007 from http://joeclark.org/dossiers/DRCGB.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Toms, E. G., & Taves, A. R. (2004). Measuring user perceptions of Web site reputation. Information Processing & Management, 40(2), 291–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2006). Some Facts about Persons with Disabilities. Retrieved on October 5th, 2008 from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/pdfs/factsheet.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, R. and Rattray, R (2004). UK hotel web page accessibility for disabled and challenged users, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 5(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S & Abel, I. (2002), So you want to get involved in E-commerce? Industrial Marketing Management, 31(2), pp. 85–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (1999). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/#toc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, T. A., & Law, R. (2004). Extending the modified heuristic usability evaluation technique to chain and independent hotel websites, Journal of Hospitality Management, 23(3), 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, L & Nestle, M (2003). Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: Implications for nutrition counseling. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(2), Pages 231–234.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag/Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiong, L., Cobanoglu, C., Cummings, P., DeMicco, F. (2009). Website Accessibility of U.S. Based Hospitality Websites. In: Höpken, W., Gretzel, U., Law, R. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2009. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-93971-0_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-93971-0_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-211-93970-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-211-93971-0

Publish with us

Policies and ethics