Skip to main content

Sensor-Activity Relevance in Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Motion Sensors and Mutual Information Criterion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Information Sciences and Systems 2013

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 264))

Abstract

Selecting a suitable sensor configuration is an important aspect of recognizing human activities with wearable motion sensors. This problem encompasses selecting the number and type of the sensors, configuring them on the human body, and identifying the most informative sensor axes. In earlier work, researchers have used customized sensor configurations and compared their activity recognition rates with those of others. However, the results of these comparisons are dependent on the feature sets and the classifiers employed. In this study, we propose a novel approach that utilizes the time-domain distributions of the raw sensor measurements. We determine the most informative sensor types (among accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers), sensor locations (among torso, arms, and legs), and measurement axes (among three perpendicular coordinate axes at each sensor) based on the mutual information criterion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The sensor configuration at full capacity implies the configuration employing all available sensor types, sensor locations, and measurement axes.

References

  1. Kim E, Helal S, Cook DJ (2010) Human activity recognition and pattern discovery. IEEE Pervas Comput (1):48–53

    Google Scholar 

  2. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LPJ, Howard D, Meijer K, Crompton R (2009) Activity identification using body-mounted sensors-a review of classification techniques. Physiol Meas 30(4):R1–R33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Turaga PK, Chellappa R, Subrahmanian VS, Udrea O (2008) Machine recognition of human activites: a survey. IEEE T Circ Syst Vid 18(11):1473–1488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Altun K, Barshan B (2012) Pedestrian dead reckoning employing simultaneous activity recognition cues. Meas Sci Technol 23(2):025103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Töreyin BU, Dedeoğlu Y, Çetin AE (2005) HMM based falling person detection using both audio and video. In: Sebe N, Lew M, Huang T (eds) Computer Vision in Human-Computer Interaction. Lecturer Notes Computational Science, Springer, Berlin, pp 211–220

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ganyo M, Dunn M, Hope T (2011) Ethical issues in the use of fall detectors. Ageing Soc 31(8):1350–1367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Preece SJ, Goulermas JY, Kenney LPJ, Howard D (2009) A comparison of feature extraction methods for the classification of dynamic activities from accelerometer data. IEEE T Bio-med Eng 56(3):871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Altun K, Barshan B (2010) Human activity recognition using inertial/magnetic sensor units. In: Salah A, Gevers T, Sebe N, Vinciarelli A (eds) Human Behavior Understanding. Lecture Notes Computational Science, Springer, Berlin, pp 38–51

    Google Scholar 

  9. Atallah L, Lo B, King RC, Gitang G-Z (2011) Sensor positioning for activity recognition using wearable accelerometers. IEEE T Bio-med Circ Syst 5(4):320–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fish B, Khan A, Chehade NH, Chien C, Pottie G (2012) Feature selection based on mutual information for human activity recognition. 2012 IEEE International Conference Acoustics Speech. pp 1729–1732

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yüksek MC (2011) A comparative study on human activity classification with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors, MSc. thesis, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  12. Altun K, Barshan B, Tunçel O (2010) Comparative study on classifying human activities with miniature inertial and magnetic sensors. Pattern Recogn 43(10):3605–3620

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Xsens Technologies BV (2010) MTi and MTx user manual and technical documentation, Document MT0100P, Revision O

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cover TM, Thomas JA (1991) Elements of Information Theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Li W (1990) Mutual information functions versus correlation functions. J Stat Phys 60(5–6):823–837

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oğuzcan Dobrucalı .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dobrucalı, O., Barshan, B. (2013). Sensor-Activity Relevance in Human Activity Recognition with Wearable Motion Sensors and Mutual Information Criterion. In: Gelenbe, E., Lent, R. (eds) Information Sciences and Systems 2013. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 264. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01604-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01604-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01603-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01604-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics