Skip to main content

False Discovery Rate for Homology Searches

  • Conference paper
Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (BSB 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 8213))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

While many different aspects of retrieval algorithms (e.g., BLAST) have been studied in depth, the method for determining the retrieval threshold has not enjoyed the same attention. Furthermore, with genetic databases growing rapidly, the challenges of multiple testing are escalating. In order to improve search sensitivity, we propose the use of the false discovery rate (FDR) as the method to control the number of irrelevant (“false positive”) sequences. In this paper, we introduce BLAST FDR , an extended version of BLAST that uses a FDR method for the threshold criterion. We evaluated five different multiple testing methods on a large training database and chose the best performing one, Benjamini-Hochberg, as the default for BLAST FDR . BLAST FDR achieves 14.1% better retrieval performance than BLAST on a large (5,161 queries) test database and 26.8% better retrieval score for queries belonging to small superfamilies. Furthermore, BLAST FDR retrieved only 0.27 irrelevant sequences per query compared to 7.44 for BLAST.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altschul, S., Gertz, E., Agarwala, R., Schäffer, A., Yu, Y.: PSI-BLAST pseudocounts and the minimum description length principle. Nucleic Acids Research 37(3), 815–824 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altschul, S.F., Madden, T.L., Schäffer, A.A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., Lipman, D.J.: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Research 25(17), 3389–3402 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y.: Controlling the False Discovery Rate: a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57, 289–300 (1995)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonferroni, C.E.: Il calcolo delle assicurazioni su gruppi di teste. Tipografia del Senato (1935)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll, H.D., Kann, M.G., Sheetlin, S.L., Spouge, J.L.: Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k): A Measure of Retrieval Efficacy Designed for Bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 26(14), 1708–1713 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chandonia, J., Hon, G., Walker, N., Lo Conte, L., Koehl, P., Levitt, M., Brenner, S.: The ASTRAL Compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Research 32(Database Issue), D189–D192 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gonzalez, M., Pearson, W.: Homologous over-extension: a challenge for iterative similarity searches. Nucleic Acids Research 38(7), 2177–2189 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gribskov, M., Robinson, N.: Use of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to evaluate sequence matching. Computers and Chemistry 20(1), 25–33 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hochberg, Y.: A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 75(4), 800–802 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 65–70 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hommel, G.: A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test. Biometrika 75(2), 383–386 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Storey, J.: A direct approach to false discovery rates. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 64(3), 479–498 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Wheeler, T.J., Clements, J., Eddy, S.R., Hubley, R., Jones, T.A., Jurka, J., Smit, A.F., Finn, R.D.: Dfam: a database of repetitive DNA based on profile hidden Markov models. Nucleic Acids Research 41(D1), D70–D82 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Carroll, H.D., Williams, A.C., Davis, A.G., Spouge, J.L. (2013). False Discovery Rate for Homology Searches. In: Setubal, J.C., Almeida, N.F. (eds) Advances in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology. BSB 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8213. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02624-4_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02624-4_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02623-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02624-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics