Skip to main content

QoE-Based Network and Application Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Quality of Experience

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of a set of recently proposed QoE-based management approaches that all try so resolve a central dilemma: maximizing user satisfaction while at the same time maximizing resource efficiency and economy. To this end, it first builds bridges between recent approaches towards QoE-based Network Management and standardized Network Management functions. This is contrasted by a discussion of recent approaches towards QoE-based Application Management. Further, it is shown how both Network Management and Application Management can work together in concert. Finally, open issues regarding a better integration of management and QoE are outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a more extensive discussion on user-centric SLAs please refer to Chap. 7 in this book.

  2. 2.

    This refers to the implementation of YouTube as of end of 2012.

References

  1. EU FP7 Project ETICS (2010–2013) Economics and technologies for inter-carrier services. https://www.ict-etics.eu

  2. (2011) NGN integrated subsystem architecture. ETSI TS 182 028, v3.5.1

    Google Scholar 

  3. EU Celtic-Plus Project QuEEN (2011–2015) Quality of experience estimators in networks. http://www.celticplus.eu/Projects/Celtic-projects/Call8/QUEEN/queen-default.asp

  4. (2013) Policy and charging control architecture. 3GPP TS 23.203, release 12. http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/html-info/23203.htm

  5. Abboud O, Zinner T, Pussep K, Al-Sabea S, Steinmetz R (2011) On the impact of quality adaptation in SVC-based P2P video-on-demand systems. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on multimedia systems, MMSys ’11, ACM, New York, USA, pp 223–232. doi:10.1145/1943552.1943582

  6. Adhikari VK, Jain S, Chen Y, Zhang ZL (2012) Vivisecting YouTube: an active measurement study. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM 2012 mini-conference, Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alberti C et al. (2013) Automated QoE evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. In: Fifth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience, QoMEX

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alcock S, Nelson R (2011) Application flow control in YouTube video streams. ACM SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 41(2):24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ameigeiras P, Ramos-Munoz JJ, Navarro-Ortiz J, Mogensen P, Lopez-Soler JM (2010) QoE oriented cross-layer design of a resource allocation algorithm in beyond 3g systems. Comput Commun 33(5):571–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Aristomenopoulos G, Kastrinogiannis T, Kaldanis V, Karantonis G, Papavassiliou S (2010) A novel framework for dynamic utility-based QoE provisioning in wireless networks. In: IEEE global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2010). IEEE pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baraković S, Skorin-Kapov L (2013) Survey and challenges of QoE management issues in wireless networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2013:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boutaba R, Polyrakis A (2001) Projecting FCAPS to active networks. In: Proceedings of the enterprise networking, applications and service conference, pp 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dillon E, Power G, Ramos MO, Rodriguez MC, Argente JR, Fiedler M, Tonesi D (2009) PERIMETER: a quality of experience framework. In: Proceedings of the future internet symposium (FIS), Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  14. El Essaili A, Zhou L, Schroeder D, Steinbach E, Kellerer W (2011) QoE-driven live and on-demand LTE uplink video transmission. In: 2011 IEEE 13th international workshop on multimedia signal processing (MMSP). IEEE, pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fiedler M, Hoßfeld T (2010) Quality of experience-related differential equations and provisioning-delivery hysteresis. In: 21st ITC specialist seminar on multimedia applications-Traffic, performance and QoE, Miyazaki, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  16. Finamore A, Mellia M, Munafo M, Torres R, Rao S (2011) YouTube everywhere: impact of device and infrastructure synergies on user experience. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM SIGCOMM internet measurement conference (IMC’11), Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gehlen V, Finamore A, Mellia M, Munafò MM (2012) Uncovering the big players of the web. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on traffic monitoring and analysis, TMA’12, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ghobadi M, Cheng Y, Jain A, Matthis M (2012) Trickle: rate limiting Youtube video streaming. In: Proceedings of the 2012 USENIX annual technical conference, Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gomez G, Lorca J, Garcia R, Perez Q (2013) Towards a QoE-driven resource control in LTE and LTE-A networks. J Comput Netw Commun 2013:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gorod A, Gove R, Sauser B, Boardman J (2007) System of systems management: a network management approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on system of systems engineering (SoSE’07), pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goyal P, Mikkilineni R (2009) FCAPS in the business services fabric model. In: Proceedings of the 18th international workshop on enabling technologies (WETICE’09), pp 45–51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Han Z, Liu KR (2008) Resource allocation for wireless networks: basics, techniques, and applications. Cambridge university press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Hong DK, Hong C, Hyoung Y (2002) An integrated network management framework for internet access service using ATM over ADSL technology. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE international conference on high speed networks and multimedia, communications, pp 24–31

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hoßfeld T, Egger S, Schatz R, Fiedler M, Masuch K, Lorentzen C (2012) Initial delay vs. interruptions: between the devil and the deep blue sea. In: 2012 fourth international workshop on quality of multimedia experience (QoMEX), p 16

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hoßfeld T, Fiedler M, Zinner T (2011) The QoE provisioning-delivery-hysteresis and its importance for service provisioning in the future internet. In: Proceedings of the 7th EURO-NGI conference on next generation internet networks (NGI 2011), Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoßfeld T, Liers F, Schatz R, Staehle B, Staehle D, Volkert T, Wamser F (2012) Quality of experience management for YouTube: clouds, FoG and the AquareYoum. PIK–praxis der informationsverarbeitung und kommunikation 35(3). doi:10.1515/pik-2012-0024. http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/piko.2012.35.issue-3/pik-2012-0024/pik-2012-0024.xml

  27. Hoßfeld T, Schatz R, Seufert M, Hirth M, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P (2011) Quantification of YouTube QoE via crowdsourcing. In: IEEE international workshop on multimedia quality of experience—modeling, evaluation, and directions (MQoE 2011), Dana Point, USA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoßfeld T, Schatz R, Varela M, Timmerer C (2012) Challenges of QoE management for cloud applications. IEEE Commun Mag 50(4):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ickin S, Vogeleer KD, Fiedler M, Erman D (2010) On the choice of performance metrics for user-centric seamless communication. In: Proceedings of the third Euro-NF workshop on socio-economic issues of networks of the future, Ghent, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  30. Isaksson L, Fiedler M (2007) Seamless connectivity in WLAN and cellular networks with multi criteria decision making. In: Proceedings of the NGI 2007, Trondheim, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  31. ISO/IEC (1998) Information technology—open systems interconnection—systems management overview

    Google Scholar 

  32. ITU-T Recommendation Y.1901 (2009) Requirements for the support of IPTV services. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  33. ITU-T Recommendation Y.1910 (2008) IPTV—functional architecture. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ivesic K, Matijasevic M, Skorin-Kapov L (2011) Simulation based evaluation of dynamic resource allocation for adaptive multimedia services. In: 7th international conference on network and service management (CNSM), pp 1–4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jammeh E, Mkwawa I, Khan A, Goudarzi M, Sun L, Ifeachor E (2012) Quality of experience (QoE) driven adaptation scheme for voice/video over IP. Telecommun Syst 49(1):99–111. doi:10.1007/s11235-010-9356-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11235-010-9356-5

  36. Jiang J, Sekar V, Zhang H (2012) Improving fairness, efficiency, and stability in HTTP-based adaptive video streaming with FESTIVE. In: Proceedings of the 8th international Conference on emerging networking experiments and technologies, CoNEXT ’12. ACM, New York, USA p 97108. doi:10.1145/2413176.2413189. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2413176.2413189

  37. Tutschku K, Fiedler M (eds) (2011) Euro-NF deliverable D.SEA.10.2. Second update of the Euro-NF vision regarding the network of the future

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khan A, Sun L, Ifeachor E (2012) QoE prediction model and its application in video quality adaptation over UMTS networks. IEEE Trans Multimedia 14(2):431–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khan A, Sun L, Jammeh E, Ifeachor E (2010) Quality of experience-driven adaptation scheme for video applications over wireless networks. IET Commun 4(11):1337–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Khan S, Duhovnikov S, Steinbach E, Kellerer W (2007) MOS-based multiuser multiapplication cross-layer optimization for mobile multimedia communication. Advances in multimedia

    Google Scholar 

  41. Latré S et al (2009) An autonomic architecture for optimizing QoE in multimedia access networks. Comput Netw 53(10):1587–1602

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee CS (2007) IPTV over next generation networks in ITU-T. In: IEEE 2nd IEEE/IFIP international workshop on broadband convergence networks, 2007. BcN’07. IEEE, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liers F, Volkert T, Martin D, Backhaus H, Wippel H, Veith E, Siddiqui AA, Khondoker R (2011) GAPI: a G-Lab application-to-network interface. In: EuroView2011, Würzburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  44. Liers F, Volkert T, Mitschele-Thiel A (2010) Demonstrating forwarding on gates with first applications. In: EuroView2010, Würzburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liers F, Volkert T, Mitschele-Thiel A (2011) Scalable network support for application requirements with forwarding on gates. In: EuroView2011, Würzburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  46. Liu X, Dobrian F, Milner H, Jiang J, Sekar V, Stoica I, Zhang H (2012) A case for a coordinated internet video control plane. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 42(4):359370. doi:10.1145/2377677.2377752. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2377677.2377752

  47. Lloret J, Garcia M, Atenas M, Canovas A (2011) A QoE management system to improve the IPTV network. Int J Commun Syst 24(1):118–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lu X, Zhou W, Song J (2010) Key issues of future network management. In: Proceedings of the international conference on computer application and system modeling (ICCASM 2010), pp V11–649-V11-653

    Google Scholar 

  49. Martini MG, Chen CW, Chen Z, Dagiuklas T, Sun L, Zhu X (2012) Guest editorial: QoE-aware wireless multimedia systems. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 30(7):1153–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mok RKP, Chan EWW, Chang RKC (2011) Measuring the quality of experience of http video streaming. In: IEEE/IFIP IM (Pre-conf Session), Dubland, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  51. Muller C, Renzi D, Lederer S, Battista S, Timmerer C (2012) Using scalable video coding for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP in mobile environments. In: 2012 IEEE proceedings of the 20th European signal processing conference (EUSIPCO). IEEE, pp 2208–2212

    Google Scholar 

  52. Oyman O, Singh S (2012) Quality of experience for HTTP adaptive streaming services. IEEE Commun Mag 50(4):20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Reichl P (2010) From charging for quality of service to charging for quality of experience. Ann Telecommun-Ann Des Télécommun 65(3–4):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Riiser H, Bergsaker HS, Vigmostad P, Halvorsen P, Griwodz C (2012) A comparison of quality scheduling in commercial adaptive HTTP streaming solutions on a 3G network. In: Proceedings of the 4th workshop on mobile video, MoVid ’12. ACM, New York, USA, p 2530. doi:10.1145/2151677.2151684. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2151677.2151684

  55. Seppänen J, Varela M (2013) QoE-driven network management for real-time over-the-top multimedia services. In: IEEE wireless communications and networking conference 2013, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sieber C, Hoßfeld T, Zinner T, Tran-Gia P, Timmerer C (2013) Implementation and user-centric comparison of a novel adaptation logic for DASH with SVC. In: IFIP/IEEE international workshop on quality of experience centric management (QCMan), Ghent, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  57. Skorin-Kapov L, Ivesic K, Aristomenopoulos G, Papavassiliou S (2013) Approaches for utility-based QoE-driven optimization of network resource allocation for multimedia services. In: Biersack E, Callegari C, Matijasevic M (eds) Data traffic monitoring and analysis, vol 7754. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 337–358

    Google Scholar 

  58. Skorin-Kapov L, Matijasevic M (2009) Modeling of a QoS matching and optimization function for multimedia services in the NGN. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP/IEEE international conference on management of multimedia and mobile networks and services. MMNS, Venice, Italy, pp 55–68

    Google Scholar 

  59. Staehle B, Hirth M, Pries R, Wamser F, Staehle D (2011) Aquarema in action: improving the YouTube QoE in wireless mesh networks. In: 2011 Baltic congress on future internet communications (BCFIC Riga). IEEE, pp 33–40

    Google Scholar 

  60. Staehle B, Wamser F, Deschner S, Blenk A, Staehle D, Hahm O, Schmittberger N, Günes M (2011) Application-aware self-optimization of wireless mesh networks with AquareYoum and DES-SERT. In: Euroview 2011, Würzburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  61. Staehle B, Wamser F, Hirth M, Stezenbach D, Staehle D (2011) AquareYoum: application and quality of experience-aware resource management for YouTube in wireless mesh networks. PIK—praxis der informationsverarbeitung und kommunikation

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stankiewicz R, Jajszczyk A (2011) A survey of QoE assurance in converged networks. Comput Netw 55:1459–1473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2011.02.004

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sterle J, Volk M, Sedlar U, Bester J, Kos A (2011) Application-based NGN QoE controller. IEEE Commun Mag 49(1):92–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stockhammer T (2011) Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP— standards and design principles. In: Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on multimedia systems, MMSys ’11ACM, New York, USA, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  65. Thakolsri S, Kellerer W, Steinbach E (2011) QoE-based cross-layer optimization of wireless video with unperceivable temporal video quality fluctuation. In: 2011 IEEE international conference on communications (ICC), pp 1–6. doi:10.1109/icc.2011.5963296

  66. Torres R, Finamore A, Kim JR, Mellia M, Munafo MM, Rao S (2011) Dissecting video server selection strategies in the youtube cdn. In: Proceedings of the 31st international conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS’11), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

    Google Scholar 

  67. Volk M, Guna J, Kos A, Bester J (2008) IPTV systems, standards and architectures: part II–quality-assured provisioning of IPTV services within the NGN environment. IEEE Commun Mag 46(5):118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Wamser F, Staehle D, Prokopec J, Maeder A, Tran-Gia P (2012) Utilizing buffered YouTube playtime for QoE-oriented scheduling in OFDMA networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th international teletraffic congress, pp 113–120

    Google Scholar 

  69. Youtube press room—statistics. http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics (last accessed Oct 2012). http://www.youtube.com/t/press_statistics

  70. Zhang J, Ansari N (2011) On assuring end-to-end QoE in next generation networks: challenges and a possible solution. IEEE Commun Mag 49(7):185–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Zinner T, Klein D, Hoßfeld T (2012) User-centric network-application interaction for live HD video streaming. In: 4th international conference on mobile networks and management (MONAMI 2012), Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raimund Schatz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schatz, R., Fiedler, M., Skorin-Kapov, L. (2014). QoE-Based Network and Application Management. In: Möller, S., Raake, A. (eds) Quality of Experience. T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02681-7_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02680-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02681-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics