Skip to main content

Passive Participation in Communities of Practice: Scope and Motivations

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8238))

Abstract

In spite of its prevalence in online social media platforms, there have been very few studies of passive participation. The current study uses interviews to understand the motivations for passive participation in online communities of the Israeli Ministry of Social Services. In addition to the motivations commonly found when not participating “more actively”, such as concerns of criticism, lack of need, lack of motivation and technological concerns, users stated two additional and secondary reasons for not contributing content in the communities: concern that their posts would not be addressed (i.e. lack of reciprocation), and reasons relating to the graphical interface of the communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Fein, T.: Online Communities of Practice in the Social Services: A Tool for Sharing and Knowledge Circulation between Employees. MA Thesis, Hebrew University of Jerusa-lem (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook-Craig, P.G., Sabah, Y.: The role of virtual communities of practice in supporting collaborative learning among social workers. British Journal of Social Work 39(4), 725–739 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Meier, A.: Offering social support via the internet: A case study of an online support group for social workers. Journal of Technology in Human Services 17(2-3), 237–266 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Lurker demographics: Counting the silent. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 73–80. ACM Press, New York (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Sassenberg, K.: Common bond and common identity groups on the Internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chats. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6, 27–37 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ridings, C., Gefen, D., Arinze, B.: Psychological barriers: Lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of AIS 18(16) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G., Soroka, V.: De-lurking in virtual communities: A social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. In: Proceedings of the 2004 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 37 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crawford, K.: Following You: Disciplines of Listening in Social Media. Continuum 23(4), 525–535 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gray, B.: Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance Education 19(1), 20–35 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J.: Why lurkers lurk. Paper Presented at the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., Andrews, D.: What lurkers and posters think of each other. Paper presented at the HICSS-37, Maui, Hawai (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ardichvili, A., Page, V., Wentling, T.: Motivation and barriers to participation on virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 7(1), 64–77 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheshire, C., Antin, J.: None of us is as lazy as all of us: Social Intelligence and Loafing in Information Pools. Information. Communication & Society 13(4), 537–555 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Beenen, G., Ling, K., Wang, X., Chang, K., Frankowski, D., Resnick, P., et al.: Using social psychology to motivate contributions to online communities. In: CSCW 2004: Proceedings of the ACM Conference On Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blair, C.A., Thompson, L.F., Wuensch, K.L.: Electronic helping behavior: The virtual presence of others makes a difference. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27, 171–178 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Preece, J., Nonnecke, B., Andrews, D.: The top 5 reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior 20, 2 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, W., Storck, J.: Peripheral members in online communities. In: AMCIS 2001 Proceeding, Paper 117 (2001), http://aisel.aisnet.org/amci2001/117

  18. White, D.S., Le Cornu, A.: Visitors and Residents: A New Typology for Online Engagement. First Monday 16(9), 5 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yeow, A., Johnson, S., Faraj, S.: Lurking: Legitimate or illegitimate peripheral participation? In: ICIS Proceedings, pp. 967–982 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Haber, K.: Organizational Culture Obstacles for Implementing Open Governance Policy. Jerusalem: Israel Democracy Institute (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davenport, E., Hall, H.: Organizational knowledge and communities of practice. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 36, 171–227 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ipe, M.: Knowledge sharing in organizations: A conceptual Framework. Human Resource Development Review 2(4), 337–359 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meier, A.: An online stress management support group for social workers. Journal of Technology in Human Services 20, 107–132 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ardichvili, A., Maurer, M., Li, W., Wentling, T., Stuedemann, R.: Cultural influences on knowledge sharing through online communities of practice. Journal of Knowledge Management 10(1), 94–107 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sproull, L., Conley, C.A., Moon, J.Y.: Prosocial behavior on the Net. In: Amichai-Hamburger, Y. (ed.) The Social Net: The Social Psychology of the Internet, pp. 139–161. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Strauss, A.L., Corbin, J.M.: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lev-On, A., Adler, O. (2013). Passive Participation in Communities of Practice: Scope and Motivations. In: Jatowt, A., et al. Social Informatics. SocInfo 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8238. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03260-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03259-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03260-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics