Skip to main content

Fuzzy Models: Easier to Understand and an Easier Way to Handle Uncertainties in Climate Change Research

  • Chapter
Book cover Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications

Abstract

Greenhouse gas emission scenarios (through 2100) developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change when converted to concentrations and atmospheric temperatures through the use of climate models result in a wide range of concentrations and temperatures with a rather simple interpretation: the higher the emissions the higher the concentrations and temperatures. Therefore the uncertainty in the projected temperature due to the uncertainty in the emissions is large. Linguistic rules are obtained through the use of linear emission scenarios and the Magicc model. These rules describe the relations between the concentrations (input) and the temperature increase for the year 2100 (output) and are used to build a fuzzy model. Another model is presented that includes, as a second source of uncertainty in input, the climate sensitivity to explore its effects on the temperature. Models are attractive because their simplicity and capability to integrate the uncertainties to the input and the output.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dubois, D., Prade, H.M.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gay, C., Estrada, F.: Objective probabilities about future climate are a matter of opinion. Climatic Change (2009), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9681-4

  3. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L. (eds.): IPCC-WGI, 2007: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p. 996. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Houghton, J.T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D.J., Noguer, M., van der Linden, P.J., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C.A. (eds.): IPCC-WGI, 2001: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press (2001) ISBN 0-521-80767-0 (pb: 0-521-01495-6)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jaynes, E.T.: Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics: Phys. Rev. 106, 620–630 (1957)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Klir, G., Elias, D.: Architecture of Systems Problem Solving, 2nd edn. Plenum Press, NY (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakicenovic, N., Alcamo, J., Davis, G., de Vries, B., Fenhann, J., Gaffin, S., Gregory, K., Grübler, A., Jung, T.Y., Kram, T., La Rovere, E.L., Michaelis, L., Mori, S., Morita, T., Pepper, W., Pitcher, H., Price, L., Riahi, K., Roehrl, A., Rogner, H.-H., Sankovski, A., Schlesinger, M., Shukla, P., Smith, S., Swart, R., van Rooijen, S., Victor, N., Dadi, Z.: Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p. 599. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider, S.H.: Congressional Testimony: U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, Hearing on “The Case for Climate Change Action” (October 1, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schmidt, G.A.: The physics of climate modeling. Phys. Today 60(1), 72–73 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wigley, T.M.L.: MAGICC/SCENGEN V. 5.3: User Manual (version 2), p. 80. NCAR, Boulder, CO. (2008), http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/wigley/magicc/

  12. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Gay García .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

García, C.G., Meneses, O.S., Martínez-López, B., Nebot, À., Estrada, F. (2014). Fuzzy Models: Easier to Understand and an Easier Way to Handle Uncertainties in Climate Change Research. In: Obaidat, M., Filipe, J., Kacprzyk, J., Pina, N. (eds) Simulation and Modeling Methodologies, Technologies and Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 256. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03581-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03581-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-03580-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-03581-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics